Wikidata:Property proposal/Siddham script name

Not done

Description	The name of this item in Siddham script
Represents	Siddhaṃ (Q250379)
Data type	Monolingual text
Allowed values	any
Example 1	Avalokiteśvara (Q193849) → 𑖀𑖪𑖩𑖺𑖎𑖰𑖝𑖸𑖫𑖿𑖪𑖨
Example 2	Vairocana (Q239847) → 𑖦𑖮𑖯𑖪𑖹𑖨𑖺𑖓𑖡
Example 3	Mañjuśrī (Q471696) → 𑖦𑖗𑖿𑖕𑖲𑖫𑖿𑖨𑖱

Siddham script name has a great role in Buddhism, such as the name of Buddha and Bodhisattva. I hope can complete the proposal. 我爱大日如来 (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This ought to be better handled by requesting a language for monolingual text (such as sa-Sidd or pi-Sidd or {some other ISO 639 language code}-Sidd) for use with name in native language (P1559). Mahir256 (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Mahir256: Also. This is my first proposal, a lot of it will not. I tried adding, pop-up warning: Could not save due to an error. "sa-Sidd" is not a known language code. --我爱大日如来 (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - You can currently use "sa" or "pi" and change this to the codes once they are available. See Help:Monolingual_text_languages#Getting_a_language_code_added on how to have it added. It generally takes several months (or even years) to have one added. --- Jura 15:57, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - phab:T230881 Submitted.--我爱大日如来 (talk) 03:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mahir256, 我爱大日如来: As it might take months/years till this is create, shall we create this property as an intermediary solution and delete it once the language code is available? It should be fairly straightword to convert the text. BTW, if so datatype should probably be string, not "monolingual text". On a side note: @我爱大日如来 is your interested in both sa and pi or just sa? --- Jura 17:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I interested in Sanskrit and Pali.--我爱大日如来 (talk) 09:32, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I would not mind if the Siddham script names were added as aliases in Sanskrit or Pali in the interim, since both those languages have been written in various Indic scripts. I'm not a big fan of having this be a stopgap property unless there is precedent for having done this for other scripts (where the property doesn't otherwise serve as an aid like a romanization or other transcription). Mahir256 (talk) 19:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done since phab:T230881 was merged. − Pintoch (talk) 09:08, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]