Wikidata:Property proposal/TOOI identifier

TOOI organisation code edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization

   Done: TOOI identifier (P11767) (Talk and documentation)
Representsgovernment organization (Q2659904)
Data typeExternal identifier
Allowed values (?:gemeente|ministerie|provincie|waterschap|oorg|col|zbo)\/[a-z]{2,4}\d{2,6}
Example 1Dutch Data Protection Authority (Q910155) - zbo/zb000215
Example 2Alkmaar (Q972) - gemeente/gm0361
Example 3Aa en Maas (Q2553577) - waterschap/ws0654
Example 4Dutch House of Representatives (Q233262) - oorg/oorg10002
Example 5Ministry of Finance (Q1037511) - ministerie/mnre1090
Sourcehttps://tardis.overheid.nl/waardelijsten.html and https://organisaties.overheid.nl/
Planned useMakes it easier to link and add data from https://organisaties.overheid.nl/, which used this identifier in csv and xml.
Number of IDs in source~1000
Expected completenesseventually complete (Q21873974)
Implied notabilityWikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316)
Formatter URLhttps://identifier.overheid.nl/tooi/id/$1
See alsoCBS municipality code (P382)
Single-value constraintno (as of right now, ministries can change names, which creates a new TOOI id, but no new Wikiddata item)
Distinct-values constraintyes

Motivatie edit

We already have CBS municipality code (P382) for Dutch municipalities, but lack an identifier for other Dutch organisations. The Dutch government has created its thesaurus, and I think it makes sense to use this. For now, it does not have that much information on the page of the external id, but they appear to be adding more (also if you look at the predecessor https://standaarden.overheid.nl/owms). The information on https://organisaties.overheid.nl/ will also be compliant with TOOI. Dajasj (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion edit

  Support seems usefull. would still make it a single value constraint. If organisations change names it's very likely it's better to model that by creating a new item, or only allow for more values when there's a qualifier--1Veertje (talk) 10:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and set this as a single-best-value constraint per other similar properties. This identifier wouldn't be in scope for a name change item, since the item itself represents an event, whereas the property identifies government agencies. —Tomodachi94 (talk) 23:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]