Wikidata:Property proposal/case id (mainland China)
case id (mainland China)
editReturn to Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
| Description | unique identifier of a legal proceeding in the jurisdiction of mainland China |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | mainland China court decision (Q125456254), legal case (Q2334719) |
| Example 1 | EN ZH → （2018）最高法行再26号 [lit. (2018) Supreme - Administrative - Retrial #26] |
| Example 2 | EN ZH → （2016）京73民初277号 [lit. (2016) Beijing 73 - Civil - First-trial #277] |
| Example 3 | EN ZH → （2016）豫民终347号 [lit. (2016) Henan High - Civil - Appeal #347] |
| Example 4 | Q129820073 → （2024）鄂0102行初375号 [lit. (2024) Hubei 0102 - Administrative - First-trial #375] |
| Example 5 | c:Category:Sentences of Ruan Xiaohuan on Feb 10, 2023 (page 1) → （2021）沪02刑初67号 [lit. (2021) Shanghai 02 - Criminal - First-trial #67] |
| Example 6 | c:Category:Sentences of Lü Gengsong on Feb 5, 2008 (page 1) → （2008）杭刑初字第29号 [lit. (2008) Hangzhou - Criminal - First-trial #29] |
| Planned use | To be used for uniquely tagging case documents and decisions from courts and authorities in mainland China. |
| Number of IDs in source | around 45 574 000 court cases assigned with a case id in the year of 2023.[1] |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) (Not all cases have written judgement text published to the public.) |
| Country | mainland China (Q7262427) |
| See also | U. S. Supreme Court docket number (P7063), Supreme Court of Canada case number (P12592), Supreme Court of Sweden case number (P8407) |
| Distinct-values constraint | yes |
Motivation
editThis is a restart of WIPO Lex ID (P12720), which I proposed in Wikidata:Property_proposal/case_number_(mainland_China), but the community finally defined the property as WIPO Lex ID, since all examples (court judgements/decisions) I introduced in the proposal were from the WIPO website. :D
Today when I wanted to enter data for this property, I find it completely changed, but reasonable.
I'm re-proposing the China property here.
For any formal judgement from a court (or eligible authority) in mainland China, there's a unique case id (案号, lit. case number) assigned to that legal proceeding. See third line (right-aligned) of Page 1 of a formal court decision. This id is almost the same as U. S. Supreme Court docket number (P7063).
There's a definitive regulation of case ids published in 2015 by China's supreme court. An unofficial English translation is available here if you're interested.
Case ids before 2015 (start of nation-wide digitization) can't be expected to follow a fixed style or format. So I would like to allow this property as a free-form text field, rather than a very strict one. --XsLiDian (talk) 14:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
References
- ↑ "最高人民法院工作报告".
全国各级法院收案4557.4万件，结案4526.8万件，同比分别增长15.6%、13.4%。
For the year of 2023: "45574k new cases; 45268k newly-resolved cases."
Discussion
edit- BrokenSegue, Kethyga, Midleading, and Vladimir Alexiev, pinging for attention. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 19:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Trade (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)- Support, but I think it's not limited to China Mainland, Taiwan & Hong Kong have similar case id written in Chinese. For example Hong Kong [1]、Taiwan [2][3]--Kethyga (talk) 07:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose 中文维基文库已经在使用legal citation of this text (P1031)了，像Q93414376这些都是，感觉没必要新建一个属性。 Midleading (talk) 17:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I don't see how this differs from legal citation of this text (P1031) if there are not any URLs. Samoasambia ✎ 16:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
