Wikidata:Property proposal/diocèse suffragant
suffragan diocese
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
Not done
Description | one of the dioceses other than the metropolitan archdiocese that constitute an ecclesiastical province |
---|---|
Represents | Q373074 |
Data type | élément (item)-invalid datatype (not in Module:i18n/datatype) |
Template parameter | « diocèse suffragant » in fr:Modèle:Infobox Archidiocèse catholique |
Domain | organisation (Q43229) or diocèse (Q665487) |
Example 1 | Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Nouméa (Q633695) → Roman Catholic Diocese of Wallis et Futuna (Q877999)/Roman Catholic Diocese of Port-Vila (Q874409) |
Example 2 | MISSING |
Example 3 | MISSING |
Motivation
editFr:dans l'archidiocèse de Nouméa Q633695, j'aimerai rajouter la propriété « diocèse suffragant » Q373074 pour y placer Diocèse de Wallis-et-Futuna Q877999 et Diocèse de Port-Vila Q874409,
En: in the Archdiocese of Nouméa Q633695, I would like to add « suffragan diocese » Q373074 property to place Roman Catholic Diocese of Wallis et Futuna Q877999 and Roman Catholic Diocese of Port-Vila Q874409, thank you, --Speltdecca (talk) 02:16, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Religions. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 10:34, 10 May 2019 (UTC).
Discussion
edit- I don't understand these examples. Normally a property links one item to another item, or to a string or other literal value. You seem to be linking these to themselves? That's not how properties work! Do you just need to use instance of (P31) here? ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment looking at the sample at https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mod%C3%A8le:Infobox_Archidioc%C3%A8se_catholique#Exemple maybe this could use has part(s) (P527) or rely on the inverse: located in the religious territorial entity (P5607). --- Jura 13:06, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
- diocèse suffragant : diocese (P708) avec en qualificatif object has role (P3831) = suffragan diocese (Q373074)--Speltdecca (talk) 02:15, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Is this an answer to the above or an alternative you've figured out yourself? Circeus (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment For clarity's sake, I've reformatted your example based on your description. Circeus (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)