Wikidata:Property proposal/end time of first publication
end time of first publication edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
| Description | end time of the first publication of the series of a work, e.g. TV series, comics series; first publication date of last episode/chapter of a work |
|---|---|
| Data type | Point in time |
| Template parameter | "last_aired" in en:Template:Infobox television, "last" in en:Template:Infobox animanga/Print / en:Template:Infobox animanga/Video / en:Template:Infobox animanga/Audio |
| Domain | instances of serial (Q15709880) |
| Allowed values | not before value in item's publication date (P577) |
| Example | Minami-ke (Q35191609) → 30 Dec 2007 |
| Planned use | instances of anime and manga (Q10901350) series |
| See also | publication date (P577); This property is subproperty of (P1647) of end time (P582) |
- Motivation
Many manga and anime series items use end time (P582) to actually refer to publication date (P577) of the item's last chapter (Q43180447)/last episode (Q43178228), but end time (P582) is ambiguous, so I've converted those claims to publication date (P577) with applies to part (P518):last chapter (Q43180447)/last episode (Q43178228) as qualifier (see Minami-ke (Q35191609) for example).
I later found that the claim may be regarded as the end time of the first publication, as we may thought of the item as if it take a long time to finish the first publication (of the whole item), so the claim can also be end time (P582) with a qualifier of (P642):publication date (Q1361758) (also see Minami-ke (Q35191609) for example).
It will be better to have a single dedicated property to replace the above two alternatives of equivalent property-qualifier pairs.
This issue is also discussed in this RFC.
--Ans (talk) 06:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
Please have one Property proposal template for each property you propose and don't mix two properties into one. Or whatever else is meant by the proposed name. ChristianKl (✉) 00:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- They are just aliases of the same property --Ans (talk) 18:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@Ans: Thee proposal is unclear to me (but I am not fimiliar with manga). Do you still want this property? If so, please gather more support. Otherwise, you can use |status=withdrawn in the proposal template. − Pintoch (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Not done, in active for months and no support vote − Pintoch (talk) 16:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)