Wikidata:Property proposal/masculine form

Not done

Description	lexeme that is the masculine form of the subject lexeme
Represents	masculine (Q499327)
Data type	Lexeme
Domain	lexeme
Example 1	queen (L1380) → king (L9670)
Example 2	actrice (L12849) → acteur (L13374)
Example 3	madre (L47362) → padre (L221496)
Example 4	lioness (L43104) → lion (L17815)
Planned use	to be used where it doesn't make sense to add the masculine form as a Form to the subject Lexeme, but instead is considered to be a separate Lexeme
See also	female form of label (P2521), male form of label (P3321)

Currently there is no single way to do this. Theklan (talk) 13:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment are there some examples in other languages where this would apply? Definitely a few more examples would help clarify how this ought to be structured. For example should it apply at the lexeme level, or senses? Perhaps it ought to be a symmetric property that links in both directions (opposite gender form?) ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a symmetry property proposal: Wikidata:Property proposal/feminine form. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose See WD:Property proposal/feminine form#20191226T0738Z analogously.―BlaueBlüte (talk) 07:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done After a long discussion the proposal has no support votes and faces opposition. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 22:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]