Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/BubblySnow

15 January 2021

edit

Rationale, discussion and results

edit

Reason: Have recreated several previously deleted entrepreneur spam items. Please see here Trade (talk) 18:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Declined @Trade: Surely this is a mistake?--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was going on behalf on @मार्तंड मल्ह:ार's request on AN. I have realized that filling CU's on behalf on other's comments is a bad idea --Trade (talk) 12:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Trade, When filing a CU request, please make sure to add diff which shows that users are connected and at least provide two users to check with. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BubblySnow made promotional edits on an (now deleted) item about Marawana Chiranjiv hence why i believe he's related to Selenamarie1992 @1997kB:--Trade (talk) 13:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@मार्तंड मल्हार:--Trade (talk) 12:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The person’s very first contributions were creating promotional items thats why I had a doubt on him मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 12:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guess i was too quick to judge. I'm very sorry about that @BubblySnow:! --Trade (talk) 22:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08 February 2021

edit

Rationale, discussion and results

edit

Reason: @ Trade: @Jasper Deng: As I said please check the contributions of BubblySnow , the person has again recreated 2 previously deleted items from an Ip and edited it by adding respective statements.
Please check Q104923577 , Q104904417 , Q70203168 .These items were deleted many times previously .
All these ip’s are interconnected and are blackhat seo spammers मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Support I was triggered by this edit to a focus item of one of the recent sockpuppet farms. The image added was uploaded shortly before. Added to the three (re-)created items mentioned, I think this needs investigation. Lymantria (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lymantria: I had an eye on the user’s contributions since a month and had a doubt at the very first moment . The user has just made ‘0’ writeup(contributions) to Hindi , Marathi , Spanish , and various wiki’s , but just to increase its count has edited the pages .मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 08:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Still we have not appointed a concrete sockpuppet or sockmaster to relate to, except the stale one above. Lymantria (talk) 09:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ Lymantria:Should we bring this to the administrator’s notice board and take the required actions ? मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 12:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@मार्तंड मल्हार: I'm afraid we don't have more than suspections. Lymantria (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lymantria: This is second time No actions are taken , the first time also it was neglected but the user has agin created and I am 100% sure that the user is a Sock मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@मार्तंड मल्हार: Annoying, but we can't block on suspicion only. Lymantria (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Q105407226 Page on id wiki also got deleted [1] .मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@मार्तंड मल्हार: Unless you have another account you believe is related to BubblySnow and have compelling evidence of that, this is not a matter requiring CheckUser attention. Specific items and the behavior of the user themselves should be dealt with at WD:AN.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@मार्तंड मल्हार: Time to go to the Administrator's Noticeboard. Lymantria (talk) 21:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lymantria: The user is now globally locked , please can you open a thread at WD:AN so that we can block the user here मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 04:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No need for that anymore then. Lymantria (talk) 06:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And here is a list of possible users to link to in the future, might this user turn up again. Lymantria (talk) 06:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Declined CU won't connect accounts to IPs, so just use behavioual evidence. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]