Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Gymnicus

Gymnicus edit

Gymnicus (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
Tools: interaction-timeline · intersect-contribs

29 March 2022 edit

Molestator (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: This is probably a rather unusual request because it concerns myself. On the admin notebook, a claim was made by Kolja21 that the account Molestator is a sock puppet of my account. Because the account hasn't made any further edits since that day, I'd like you to confirm that the claim made by Kolja21 is wrong and that it's a false suspicion. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion:

Gymnicus is a blocked user. Imho another attempt to annoy us and keep us from work. Numerous fruitless discussions:

--Kolja21 (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results: I did run a check earlier and the data is Inconclusive to Unlikely on these two accounts. @Gymnicus: To be clear, I ran that check based on my own suspicion around the time Kolja21 made the claim; requests to check yourself won't (otherwise) be granted.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jasper Deng: Two questions arise for me: 1. Why didn't you already share this knowledge in the discussion Please make a decision (found here after archiving)? 2. What other possibility does one have as an accused user to defend oneself against such a claim? --Gymnicus (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]