Function details:Hazard-Bot (talk • contribs • logs) stopped archiving old requests for deletions so I was asked after a request to do this task as Hazard-Bot does not work very consistent and is not really stable atm (sorry Hazard-SJ). The first idea to archive redirects instead of marking them as deleted won't work as there might also be some critical requests. Best regards, -- Bene*talk 21:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Yay. Make a few test edits and then I'll go ahead and approve it :) Legoktm (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Take a look at  and . Only archived very old requests for testing (older than 5 hours). @GZWDer: I like your idea. Let's see what the others think about it. -- Bene*talk 12:35, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict)I like GZWder's idea, but immediate archive is not that sufficient, so 5 mins for very high would be better. --by Revi레비 at 12:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict)@Bene*: please confirm that the bot can archive discussions to archive page, especially if archiving long discussion. Hazard-Bot does not do it well, like : It removed old requests indeed, but does not succeed to save it to archive page because it is too long. If you run bot in Wikimedia Labs, It is probably better then what Hazard-Bot did.--GZWDer (talk) 12:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
As far as I can see  contains all requests the bot has removed from WD:RFD. Did I miss something? -- Bene*talk 12:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
@Legoktm: Would you like to approve this then? For the time being I can do it same as Hazard-Bot and wait an hour. I think this is quite urgent. -- Bene*talk 13:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.