Wikidata:Requests for deletions

(Redirected from Wikidata:RFD)


Requests for deletions
Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata connect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if 1) the user is still active on Wikidata and 2) the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead.

More information

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at March 5.

Requests for deletions

very high

~211 open requests for deletions.

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}Edit

None at the moment

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.

RequestsEdit

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.



Q65948213Edit

Q65948213: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Cross-wiki spam; connected sitelinks are requested for deletion as well MisterSynergy (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Any Urdu speaker to help delete the last sitelink so that we can delete the item here? -Ash Crow (talk) 15:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Q93740491Edit

entity obsoleted in Gene Ontology (Q93740491): this term was part of Gene Ontology but has been removed or given the is_obsolete flag: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The semantics that Wikidata uses for marking external depreaction is depracting statements on our end and not adding new Property:P31 statements ChristianKl❫ 23:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC) Andrew Su
Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Pierre Lindenbaum
Michael Kuhn
Boghog
Emw
Chandres
Dan Bolser
Pradyumna
Chinmay
Timo Willemsen
Salvatore Loguercio
Tobias1984
Daniel Mietchen
Optimale
Mcnabber091
Ben Moore
Alex Bateman
Klortho
Hypothalamus
Vojtěch Dostál
Gtsulab
Andra Waagmeester
Sebotic
Mvolz
Toniher
Elvira Mitraka
David Bikard
Dan Lawson
Francesco Sirocco
Konrad U. Förstner (talk)
Chris Mungall (talk)
Kristina Hettne
Hardwigg
i9606
Putmantime
Tinm
Karima Rafes
Finn Årup Nielsen
Jasper Koehorst
Till Sauerwein
Crowegian
Nothingserious
Okkn
AlexanderPico
Amos Bairoch
Gstupp
DePiep
Was a bee
SarahKeating
Muhammad Elhossary
Ptolusque
Netha
Damian Szklarczyk
Kpjas
Thibdx
Juliansteinb
TiagoLubiana
SCIdude
Photocyte
Yusra Haider
JS
Hannes Röst
Kritika Dusad
T.Shafee(evo&evo) (talk)
GoEThe
  Notified participants of WikiProject Molecular biology ChristianKl❫ 23:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't know if it should be deleted but it shouldn't be the only P31 as in parasitism (Q186517) (unless it's a concept that only existed in Gene Ontology). There the identifier, which is necessary for that statement, has also been removed although the URL https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q186517&oldid=600653999 explains why their identifier was deprecated - they prefer to use another identifier linked to symbiosis (Q121610) rather than a separate concept. It could be used as a reference or as a qualifier. Peter James (talk) 20:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The identifiers should be restored with deprecated rank and reason for deprecation (P2241):deprecated identifier value (Q67125514). Peter James (talk) 21:06, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
  • I don't think we have found the ideal solution yet for cases where an item is entirely based on some external database and that database deletes the item for whatever reason. Some P31 that indicates that the entire item is deprecated could indeed be helpful. --- Jura 12:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Q103839062Edit

Gyaanipedia (Q103839062): World's largest parody of Wikipedia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Previously deleted Alexhuff13 (talk) 06:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Dear @Alexhuff13: I don't have any idea that it was previously deleted or not but is there no way to request undeletion or something like that. Kindly reply me, I don't think at all that this topic should be deleted and if this is the policy that previously deleted items should be deleted then is there any way to restore the previous version. Pokai (talk)

Hello @Pokai: , creating previously deleted items without proper reference leads to LTA spam . To know why the previous item was deleted plesse contact an administrator.
How is it a parody of Wikipedia? I checked a couple pages and it just seems like it is an outdated mirror. For example, this is a 2015 version of w:Solar Physics Division. -Ash Crow (talk) 15:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Q98688531Edit

Rubén Flórez Pinedo (Q98688531): Peruvian singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability MisterSynergy (talk) 08:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose it is notable by Wikidata:Notability point 3 (structural need). - yona b (talk) 07:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Q102205036Edit

Oliver Smith (Q102205036): researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item; an ORCID was previously here, but has been removed as the link no longer works. JalenFolf (talk) 07:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
I restored the identifier, it just has a name with "no public information" but is used in links from other items (currently only Youth mental health competencies in regional general practice (Q102205039). Peter James (talk) 14:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  Keep Matlin (talk) 10:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Q68321474Edit

Ali Hosseinzadeh (Q68321474): Iranian musician and composer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No wikilinks, no notability. I nominated the signature in Commons for deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  Keep many external id's Matlin (talk) 10:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Q96815495Edit

Lydia Phillips (Q96815495): 1720 - Aft 1753: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems to be imported from a conflated object (combination of two people) in the source dataset. --RevWilliamCollins (talk) 08:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Keep to avoid re-import. Corrected P31. --- Jura 11:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Q77356845Edit

J'ai oublié de vivre (Q77356845): vocal track by Johnny Hallyday; 1977 studio recording: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is a duplication, correct item is "Q20016042" --Kintaro (talk) 14:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
The reason is the following: items J'ai oublié de vivre (Q77356845) and Me olvidé de vivir (Q77358401) are duplications of item J'ai oublié de vivre (Q20016042). All three items refer to the same song, written by Pierre Billon and Jacques Revaux in 1977 for the French singer Johnny Hallyday (stage name of Jean-Philippe Smet). The song is known in Spanish as Me olvidé de vivir because it was sang, as of the same year, by Spanish singer Julio Iglesias (please go back to duplication item Q77358401). It is obvious that two items here have to be deleted: Q77356845 and Q77358401. Kindest regards, Kintaro (talk) 15:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Kintaro, I can understand why merge Q77356845 with Q20016042 but if the song have a Spanish variation (Q77358401), why merge it too? and it look like that Q77356845 is about a specific recording of the song Q20016042. I am not sure if we need an item for it or not. - yona b (talk) 07:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi yona b. Simply do what you think is right. Regards, Kintaro (talk) 09:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q77358401Edit

Me olvidé de vivir (Q77358401): translated song; Spanish adaptation of "J'ai oublié de vivre", lyrics adapted by Julio Iglesias: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is a duplication, correct item is "Q20016042" --Kintaro (talk) 14:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Please give a reason. --SweetWood (talk) 14:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi @SweetWood:, the reason is the following: items J'ai oublié de vivre (Q77356845) and Me olvidé de vivir (Q77358401) are duplications of item J'ai oublié de vivre (Q20016042). All three items refer to the same song, written by Pierre Billon and Jacques Revaux in 1977 for the French singer Johnny Hallyday (stage name of Jean-Philippe Smet). The song is known in Spanish as Me olvidé de vivir because it was sang, as of the same year, by Spanish singer Julio Iglesias (please go back to duplication item Q77358401). It is obvious that two items here have to be deleted: item Q77356845 and item Q77358401. Please see above, I asked the corresponding deletion request for duplication item Q77356845. Kindest regards, Kintaro (talk) 15:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Q63197887Edit

Debra James (Q63197887): first wife of Sean Bean: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Just the first wife of Sean Bean. Empty, almost certainly not notable. Wolverène (talk) 06:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  Keep first wife of Sean Bean "fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful" Piecesofuk (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
In the earlier condition of the item it was not helpful for any structural need and at that time it might be simplier to start enumerating his wives from the second one... However I see that the item has been expanded with adding of her occupation so now it meets WD:N criterion #2 (clearly identifiable material entity). Now I'm gonna agree if it will be kept. --Wolverène (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep per Piecesofuk, and the nominator does not seem to actively argue for deletion any more given the recent changes in the item. whym (talk) 13:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request - articles from Benezit and Electronic Enlightenment and Grove Art OnlineEdit

I've recently found this bunch of items, recently created by @LargeDatasetBot: operated by @GZWDer:, consisting of instance of (P31) encyclopedic article (Q13433827) + title (P1476) + publication date (P577) + DOI (P356). In some cases they have no incoming links (e.g. Alberghetti, Antonio (Q103892852)), in some other cases the only incoming link is from the subject of the article (e.g. Checa y Sanz, Ulpiano (Q104020935)) through the qualifier statement is subject of (P805) applied to described by source (P1343) Benezit Dictionary of Artists (Q2929945). Since we have Benezit ID (P2843) representing the relationship between the subjects of the articles of Benezit Dictionary of Artists (Q2929945) and the articles themselves (the DOI in the article-item exactly corresponds to the formatter URL+ID of the identifier property), the statement described by source (P1343) should be removed from subject items (see this discussion), thus leaving all the article-items with no incoming links and, in my opinion, substantially useless replications of the values of Benezit ID (P2843). The title (P1476) may be transferred to a named as (P1810) qualifier of Benezit ID (P2843); for the rest, I think the items can be deleted. --Epìdosis 16:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

@Epìdosis: An article is itself a topic. The intentional usage of these items is not as value or qualifier of described by source (P1343); The article items should be linked from subject using statement is subject of (P805) (as a qualifier of Benezit ID (P2843) (see Q2627916#P2843). These items can be used in w:Template:Cite Q; they have citation themselves; and they can be cited by other works. In addition, some (though not all) have author listed, which is not expressible in the subject item.--GZWDer (talk) 19:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Another reason is allow they to be searchable, without relying on a unstable system like Mix'n'Match.--GZWDer (talk) 19:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
@GZWDer: Thank you very much for your explanations, I understand them but I don't fully agree. Specifically: I agree very much about using statement is subject of (P805) as qualifier of Benezit ID (P2843) instead of as qualifier of described by source (P1343) Benezit Dictionary of Artists (Q2929945), surely it should be so (if these items are kept); and I agree about Mix'n'match being not so stable (however, once the ID is added to the item, I would consider it stable). I still don't understand the necessity of items per se: all the information they contain can be stored as qualifiers, this can be said for author (P50) and publication date (P577) (e.g. Q44233#P4223) and also for DOI (P356) (e.g. Q5454#P6194). I recognize that the usage with w:Template:Cite Q can somehow justify them, but I'm not sure it can be enough; WD:N doesn't clearly admit the existence of such items, with the obvious exception of articles present in one Wikisource. I think the problem is worth some thought, in order to take a clear decision and if necessary edit WD:N as a consequence, so I ping the project Source MetaData for further discussion, here or in their talk page as they prefer. --Epìdosis 20:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Mattsenate (talk) 13:11, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
KHammerstein (WMF) (talk) 13:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Mitar (talk) 13:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Mvolz (talk) 18:07, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Daniel Mietchen (talk) 18:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Merrilee (talk) 13:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Pharos (talk) 14:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
DarTar (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
HLHJ (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Blue Rasberry 18:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
JakobVoss (talk) 12:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 02:06, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Abecker (talk) 23:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:21, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Mike Linksvayer (talk) 23:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Kopiersperre (talk) 20:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Jonathan Dugan (talk) 21:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hfordsa (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 15:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Runner1928 (talk) 03:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Pete F (talk)
econterms (talk) 13:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Sj (talk)
TomT0m
addshore 17:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Ainali (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Shani Evenstein (talk) 21:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Skim (talk) 07:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
PKM (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Ocaasi (talk) 22:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Trilotat Trilotat (talk) 15:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
NAH
Iwan.Aucamp
Alessandra Boccone
Pablo Busatto (talk) 05:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Blrtg1 (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Kosboot (talk) 21:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Matlin (talk) 09:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Carrierudd(talk) 11:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
So9q (talk) 11:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
pdesai (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  Notified participants of WikiProject Source MetaData

Correlated discussion: Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2020/12#Encyclopedia_article_items. --Epìdosis 21:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
  • I don't think there is a need for these for the formats of Help:Sources and I don't see another usecase. If we had copies of the articles at Wikisource, the items were helpful, but this mainly as Wikisource's metadata is still at Wikidata. --- Jura 11:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The problem also regards hundreds (or thousands) of items having published in (P1433) Electronic Enlightenment (Q1326050) (e.g. Marc Michel Bousquet [bousqmarcm000395] (Q103870644)). I'm waiting for other opinions, but there seem to be no user supporting keeping these items, except their creator. --Epìdosis 16:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Electronic Enlightenment also contains a large number of letters which may be created as individual items and Q103870644 will be served as an index.--GZWDer (talk) 20:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Also Grove Art Online (Q21431157), although items don't have published in (P1433) (e.g. Barracco, Giovanni (Q103891835)). --Epìdosis 14:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
An issue to consider is if articles do not match to an existing Wikidata item, there will be no way to store its metadata.--GZWDer (talk) 10:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
I've opened a general discussion here in order to have a clear consensus about notability of encyclopedia articles. --Epìdosis 10:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
  • I am for keeping them, it would be better if the description said "encyclopedia article", so fewer people would try and merge them in the future, and not confuse them with the human entry. If these were from an online database there would be not doubt that they would exists as an Identifier. I am always looking for additional biographical entries for historical people. --RAN (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Q67130615Edit

Building at Rua Graciano Olavo Geribello, 195 (Q67130615): Historical site listed by the CONDEPHAAT in the city of Itu: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This building don´t exist. The pdf source says "Rua Graciano Olavo Geribello nºs 157 (Asilo de Mendicidade N. S. da Candelária), 162, 172, 174, 194 a 204, 248". In Google Maps can be seen numbers 194, 200, 202 and 204. --Rodrigolopes (talk) 14:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Also nominating with the same rationale:

Q67130616, Q67130617, Q67130618, Q67130619, Q67130621 and Q67130623.

Pinging @Ederporto: if any additional comments are needed. Rodrigolopes (talk) 14:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

  • It doesn't exist or it never existed? --- Jura 11:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  • 194-204 would have been better combined as one item, not the separate addresses. It's possible the missing even numbers existed but are now part of those that still exist, but the source doesn't mention specific numbers within the range. The odd numbers, if they existed, are likely to have been on the other side of the road and not part of 194-204. Peter James (talk) 21:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Q97098279Edit

Sophie Westman (Q97098279): Roger Westman's daughter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable --PforPink (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
it is notable by Wikidata:Notability point 3 (structural need). - yona b (talk) 07:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q99032797Edit

Röne (Q99032797): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does this "family name" exist? there is nothing connected to it. Quakewoody (talk) 22:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

  • This is a German surname but it's extremely rare - only two persons bear it in western federated states of Germany (I can provide a source but it is not directly related to surnames in Germany).
    In short, I'm not sure there are would be many notable persons with the surname Röne. --Wolverène (talk) 05:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
I guess the only one more-or-less known is this guy: [1][2], doesn't appear to be a notable one. --Wolverène (talk) 05:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Keep wikidata only cares that it exists, not that it is widespread. --RAN (talk) 07:55, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  • It may not be notable if the number of those with the surname can be count by both hands' fingers and none of them are acceptable by the criteria. So seems no structural need. What's for reliable sources describing the subject, I couldn't find anything except this (it just shows that there are no Röne's in Luxembourg and only two surname bearers in borderline areas of Germany, undated but I guess as of 1980-90s). --Wolverène (talk) 19:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delete Do we need surnames which are not used for any human in WD and have no references? --Haansn08 (talk) 10:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104236733Edit

Category:Views from Citybus Route 10, Admiralty, Hong Kong (Q104236733): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Malformed --- Jura 07:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
@Jura1: Probably this needs some cleanup on Commons, but as things stand this one looks OK? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  • @Mike Peel: No, it's linked from Admiralty (Q3270129): business district in Hong Kong. Not sure if items for like "views from bus route 123" are a good idea either. --- Jura 08:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
    @Jura1: Looking again, it still seems fine to me - but could do with improvement if you want. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

also Q104236684Edit

Category:Views from Hong Kong Tramways, Admiralty, Hong Kong (Q104236684): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same problem as the other at Q3270129#P8933 --- Jura 20:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
So merge the two discussions? Or better yet, ask me on my talk page before jumping to RfD? Mike Peel (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
They need to be deleted anyways, so we might as well list them here. Obviously, it would be helpful if you'd do some cleanup yourself. --- Jura 21:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Except I disagree that they need to be deleted, see the other discussions. And you might have missed the cleanup I have been doing anyway? Mike Peel (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Let's discuss it then (I moved this section up). P8933, as I understood it, was for a 1:1 relationship, not 1:many. --- Jura 07:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
In general, yes, it's expected to be 1:1. But exceptions will exist, it depends on the category structure on Commons. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
I don't think we should have 1:many. There are surely plenty of bus routes in Hong Kong and New York crossing a given quarter, but they don't all need to be listed in the quarter. --- Jura 10:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
In that case, perhaps we should have items for the bus routes, and maybe commons categories too? I think there is room for improvement in Wikidata items and Commons categories in such cases, but they can be done without deleting the items (just update/move their properties). Note that the bot will not do many:1. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

also Q104236177Edit

Category:Views from automobiles in Queens, New York City (Q104236177): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unsuitable for category for the view from the item (P8933). something went wrong here @Mike Peel: --- Jura 07:45, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Same problem as previous. --- Jura 07:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Q98591775Edit

Johnny Bravo (Q98591775): video game series based on the eponymous animated television show: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a video game series Trade (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Q104370472Edit

Wikimedia films-by-language category (Q104370472): use with 'instance of' (P31) for wiki categories that define a set of films by their original language (P364): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Mirroring of Wikipedia category tree, use Wikimedia category (Q4167836) instead --- Jura 18:55, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Q98546748Edit

Christian Deciga (Q98546748): American entrepreneur and co-founder of Everipedia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self Promotion --183.83.137.90 10:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Q98546748Edit

Christian Deciga (Q98546748): American entrepreneur and co-founder of Everipedia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion, and paid articles --Terabaapbsdk (talk) 10:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Q66593009Edit

Wikidata end cause (Q66593009): used with P1534: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

The item presents items that are not Wikidata internal as Wikidata internal items ChristianKl❫ 17:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Do you mean it's just reduntant or may be replaced by/with anything? --Wolverène (talk) 05:23, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Q104369375Edit

Akhil Bhartiya Khatik Samaj (Q104369375): Community organization: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 20:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Q104261692Edit

Templeogue (Q104261692): townland in Clondalkin, County Dublin, Ireland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recently created, apparently in error, describing the Dublin suburb of Templeogue as "a townland in Clondalkin". Templeogue already has a correct item (Q2668330) while Clondalkin is a town a few kilometres away. Clondalkin and Templeogue are unrelated and their areas do not coincide in any way. --O'Dea (talk) 23:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

OpenStreetMap has a boundary of Clondalkin electoral division from the 1901 census (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10224678) that includes the townland (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2254798), so it looks like that or something similar could be the source of the description. Q104261692 also has an identifier for the townland that is not in Q2668330. Is the townland the same as the suburb or should they stay as separate items? Peter James (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Items with attributes and no sitelinksEdit

Minister of Republic of Cyprus (Q64918889): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Minister of Republic of Cyprus (Q64918889), ministry of Cyprus Republic (Q66488868), Minister of Sweden (Q18246031) don't include a valid sitelink nor do they fulfil a structural need. I had previously deleted Minister of Republic of Cyprus (Q64918889) and ministry of Cyprus Republic (Q66488868), but @Ymblanter: undeleted them after a request on the administrator's noticeboard. However, I think is necessary to open a discussion about this. Allowing to create items in Wikidata with specific attributes, such as nationality, religion, political ideology, will mean thousands of items at the discretion of their creators. Wikidata has appropriate properties and qualifiers to include all attributes, so there's no structural need to have an item for each attribute. Just another example of an item with 2 attributes is cleric regular theatine (Q89346452) --Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 16:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

There was already a discussion for deletion. Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/11/27#Q64918889. Also see Wikidata:Notability point 3: "It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful."   Keep Data Gamer play 19:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Could you please put an example of this structural need? Nationalities, religions, political ideologies can be easily included through statements and qualifiers. The previous discussion didn't consider the problems that would bring allowing items for each attribute. Items which included a valid sitelink are not an issue, because they fulfill the first point of the notability policy. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 19:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
@Jura1, Lymantria: Data Gamer play 19:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

  Comment for Minister of Republic of Cyprus (Q64918889) now there is a valid sitelink so please remove it from the request. Thanks. Data Gamer play 19:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Items with a valid sitelink are notable. This discussion is about all the rest. Hence, the subtitle of this request for deletion. Yet another example (but there are plenty more) of an item with attributes and no sitelinks: ministry of Cyprus Republic (Q66488868). Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 21:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
For ministry of Cyprus Republic (Q66488868) now there is a valid sitelink. You can discuss for ministry of the Kingdom of Sardinia (Q25936252), ministry of the Kingdom of Italy (Q26243694), ministry of Yemen (Q28492208), ministry of East Germany (Q28532285), ministry of Hungary (Q52063153). I wasn't able to find more items with no sitelink. Data Gamer play 22:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Just asking. If we have items with sitelink with the type "ministry of COUNTRYNAME" for 190 countries, and use them as statements is ok, but if we create five more for other 5 countries and these 5 have no sitelinks, then we must delete these 5 items? Data Gamer play 21:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

If an item is linked to other items is because one or several editors decided it was necessary, but this request for deletion is to discuss the notability of items with attributes but no sitelinks. For instance, the case of cleric regular theatine (Q89346452), which is also linked to several items. This happened because one user decided it was a good idea to create an item agglomerating 2 attributes, even though the same information was already included using religious order (P611) and occupation (P106), so there was no structural need but a personal decision. What's the limit then? Should we allowed an item for "British female politician" or "American conservative politician" when the same information can be added through statements? Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 22:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
As for the minsters and ministries, those are often for instance linked to categories topic's main category (P910)/category's main topic (P301) as well as subclass in several items. That makes them fullfil "structural need" as described at Wikidata:Notability sub 3, which gives a lot of freedom for its use and is certainly not a strict "need", as we can see from the phrase "it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful". cleric regular theatine (Q89346452), used for claims with occupation (P106), imho also sufficiently fulfils structural need. Lymantria (talk) 11:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
@Lymantria: The key issue seems to be that phrase "to make statements in other items more useful". Is it more useful to create items so specific such as "woman government minister of Cyprus" or would it better to add the same information through statements? Following your idea, such item could be linked to Category:Women government ministers of Cyprus (Q28421241) by using topic's main category (P910)/category's main topic (P301). Some other examples of existent categories which could get their corresponding item: Category:Female United States senators (Q8446003), Category:Gay politicians (Q8481717), Category:Socialist politicians (Q32903245), Category:African-American politicians (Q8225385). Are you supporting the creation of items for each category? Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 16:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
@Andreasmperu: I am afraid you are cherrypicking in what I said: "... linked to categories topic's main category (P910)/category's main topic (P301) as well as subclass in several items". If those are the case, yes IMHO you can state that it can be seen as structural need in the sense that it is used to make statements in other items more useful. Let me stress that "more useful" is not a very strong condition and somewhat subjective, but those are the exact wordings used to describe notability. Lymantria (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
There could be statements that would be better added to the class than to each member, or items for legislation that should link to the class. This is more likely for ministers of a country than for other combinations. Peter James (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Q89412367Edit

chomsky.info (Q89412367): Noam Chomsky website: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

At the moment Noam Chomsky (Q9049) official website (P856) <https://chomsky.info> is sufficient. There is no structural need for this item. Haansn08 (talk) 17:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

  • I don't think we should delete items that are used within en.wiki. ChristianKl❫ 18:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
I just saw I already have requested the deletion for this item in the past here. It was deleted and apparently restored. @ChristianKl: How can I see where this item is used on enwiki? --Haansn08 (talk) 21:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q89412367&action=info shows that it is used. We currently don't have an easy way to figure out where. Asking the person who created the item might be one way. ChristianKl❫ 21:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
@DavidMCEddy: Do you happen to know where this item is used? --Haansn08 (talk) 20:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  • A search on ENWP says that it is talked about on Noam Chumsky's article. Quakewoody (talk) 22:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
  • I cannot find the id Q89412367 in the source of Noam Chomsky's article. --Haansn08 (talk) 20:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Q33468Edit

Lari dialect of Achomi (Q33468): language: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This page is constantly mistaken for the page Achomi (Q4699526) while it should point to the right topic! --Achomia (talk) 23:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata:VerifiabilityEdit

The view that Wikidata:Verifiability describes doesn't reflect current practice and consensus in Wikidata (and the page itself was never made policy). It's existence is doing more to confuse users about the policies of Wikidata then it does to inform them. While it might be valuable to have a policy dealing with the subject it would to be need to be written from scratch. ChristianKl❫ 11:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Agreed. We also need to make it easier to add sources. It is not intuitive at all for people who haven't read the help page, nor is the help page easily accessible for most. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 03:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure this is the right place to discuss deletion of that page, since it isn't an item - I would discuss a rewrite on the talkpage or project chat --DannyS712 (talk) 22:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep xDDDDddd Matlin (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Q76221050Edit

Elizabeth Meffant (Q76221050): husband of Sir Roger Lewknor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unsourced peerage mess Jklamo (talk) 23:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep The Peerage is the source, just fix the typo, or delete the years. We get a dozen of these typos a week by us or by the original source. --RAN (talk) 07:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
  • The other reference, geni.com, is also unreliable; if the dates there were correct some people in the family would have been born before their parents. https://books.google.com/books?id=0VkMAQAAMAAJ&pg=RA2-PA218 describes her as widow of Roger Lewknor and if that's correct she couldn't have died in 1501. According to https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Lewknor-85 (not sure if that's reliable but sources are cited) she died no earlier than 1574. Peter James (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104154189Edit

Rohit Rajput (Q104154189): bodybuilder: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Might have some notability as a national bodybuild champion, but is it sufficient? --Lymantria (talk) 18:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Q10857113Edit

2010 FIFA World Cup Kick-Off Celebration Concert (Q10857113): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty, formerly only included a redirect of little value Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 20:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

There's a Commons category; it doesn't need a separate Wikipedia article but can be included in Wikidata. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/8625370.stm and http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_8730000/newsid_8734500/8734588.stm mention it; newspapers' sites have similar coverage. Peter James (talk) 23:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104446456Edit

Indonesian Painter Category (Q104446456): Indonesian artists: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Crosswiki abuse: LTA Harling Art. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 02:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold, pending deletion on mswiki. --Esteban16 (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Q60574237Edit

GARY FRANCIONE E ABOLICIONISMO ANIMAL (Q60574237): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Complete mess. DOI links to a completely unrelated book. Title is in Portuguese but it's cited as English. Created by QSbot. NMaia (talk) 02:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Q15830561Edit

Ervina (Q15830561): Mari female given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused, previously incorrectly used, likely malformed entry. One might be looking for Q16747215 or Q9254866 or Q104713150 --- Jura 10:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

  • I reverted some of the recent edits and merged Q104713150. Peter James (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Эрвина is romanizing as Ervina, if matters. This is not a feminine analogue of the "mainland" European name Erwin(a), this is of Volga Finnic origin. --Wolverène (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
See Q991038. --Wolverène (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
  • @Peter James: If it's a conflation, reverting my edits wont help. --- Jura 10:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
    From when it was created it was stable for several years, then an incorrect statement was added that was not reverted. Peter James (talk) 11:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
    • What edit was that? I think it was mostly empty for years which didn't really help determine what it was about. --- Jura 07:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q66372475Edit

Giulio Risi (Q66372475): Italian pianist and composer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per it:Wikipedia:Pagine da cancellare/Giulio Risi, Giulio Risi was considered non-notable. He is out of project scope. I nominated the files about him for deletion as well in Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Archetipodue. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep his sitelinks are valid, which means he fits our project scope. Wikidata notability is not the same as Wikipedia notability, we only care that the entry is real, not a hoax, so we ask for outside links to show he is real. His music appears on each of the streaming services. --RAN (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Q5328642Edit

East Indians (Q5328642): ethno-religious Indian Christian community who are members of the Catholic Church: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The description and claims about this item are incorrect. For example, the description incorrectly identifies it as an “ethno-religious Indian Christian community” while the identifier used is for “East Indians” --people from India. The term "East Indians" has colonial origins and had been used in the past to refer to people from India. “East Indians” can be used as an alternate label for “Indians,” as has been done in Q862086. --Parobis1 (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
There can be more than one item with the same label; the descriptions distinguish them. Q862086 has "East Indians" as an alias in English, this is about the Indian Christian community also called East Indians. Peter James (talk) 20:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Peter James is correct.   Keep Lectrician1 (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104720575Edit

Andrew Gelles (Q104720575): American skateboarder and skatepark owner: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Questionable notability, along with Substance Skatepark (Q104720571) Haansn08 (talk) 22:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104727574Edit

Mohammad-Amin Charusaie (Q104727574): Researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. It was deleted a couple of weeks ago. --Billy Jaz (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104899496Edit

Q104899496: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam BubblySnow  💬 06:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104899336Edit

Pablo Slonimsqui (Q104899336): argentine lawyer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertising and no-notability BubblySnow  💬 06:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104899521Edit

Forum Shopping Reloaded (Q104899521): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No References BubblySnow  💬 06:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Q19958785Edit

Station Chief (Q19958785): official in the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is Q2962044 --2003:F1:C716:400:99DE:7B7D:90F1:DB28 22:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I moved the sitelink back, Q19958785 is a subclass and they have separate categories (Q9586571 and Q9586563). Peter James (talk)

Q104626377Edit

Jinson Varghese (Q104626377): Cybersecurity Professional: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, spam, Advertising Baby come (talk) 22:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

  • Not spam or advertising. Only external links relevant to the subject is seen to be given. There exists multiple news items showing this person's notability in the IT security space, with works impacting large number of users. With IT security becoming a hot topic, this person being relevant in the field, and with the entry fulfilling Wikidata's requirement of verification of an entry to prove that the subject is real and not a hoax, I think we should   Keep it. Devilsdeheaven (talk) 10:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
  • No. That is not how it works. We say that, but it is just a phrase. We do need more than 'existence'. Quakewoody (talk) 15:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete no good references 1Veertje (talk) 08:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Q230667Edit

Q230667: a method of word formation: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

It should be connected to Q2081024, based on this study (2.1), their classification should be merged too (if there is any discrepancy) Adam78 (talk) 17:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Q63974199, which links there, doesn't seem to have much content, so it should be deleted. Adam78 (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104907491Edit

The Rear-Guard (Q104907491): edition of poem in The Muse in Arms: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recent creation, unlinked, superfluous  — billinghurst sDrewth 20:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

  Keep so the poem (Q5185279) The Rear-guard (Q104907493) has two known editions if I refer to its wikisource page. One in Counter-Attack and Other Poems (Q19065275) and one in The Muse in Arms (Q7752697). Unlike Counter-Attack and Other Poems (Q19065275) that has a wikisource dedicated page, The Muse in Arms (Q7752697) is an anchor in this page. But it's a totally valid edition so it should be kept. --Deansfa (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
  Keep as per rationale provided by User:Deansfa. --Smallison (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Q27088922Edit

Albert Eadie (Q27088922): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Link is from Royal Enfield (Q1507823). Peter James (talk) 00:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Q53485274Edit

Wario Bros. (Q53485274): fictional sibling group in the Mario franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fan-coined term, seems not to be used by Nintendo themselves, no iw-links, no real content etc. Sabelöga (talk) 23:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104996286Edit

DZIF-AM (Q104996286): an kapampangan language radio station owned by Audiovisual Communicators, Inc.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability and also request you to delete wikipedia page linked with this Item BubblySnow  💬 06:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold Deletion on Wikipedia must happen a priori. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104640352Edit

Kunal Khosla (Q104640352): Indian actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable spam with no links --IWI (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104883020Edit

Mahmood Nouri (Q104883020): Iranian film editor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Minorax (talk) 08:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
  • I doubt we need the associated items, but one of them has a commons category. If you want to delete all of them, we need to take care of that too. Quakewoody (talk) 15:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

  Keep He is the editor of many famous Iranian Films. 89.45.61.83 08:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Like I said, I don't think any of the connected items pass notability either. Quakewoody (talk) 14:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


  Keep his works on IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7389759 Eliseriot (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  • That wasn't the same IMDb link that was originally listed. It makes me question the authenticity of either. Quakewoody (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Q20155479Edit

Q20155479: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item linked with Help:Learn to create new article on Turkish Wikipedia. But since it was created, content has been full of personal advertising and spam. I request that it will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Deleted the inappropriate content. I think the item is now valid and doesn't have to be deleted. (Leaving for another admin to decide.) --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Q102788545Edit

On the Compressibility of Affinely Singular Random Vectors (Q102788545): scientific article published in 2020: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? --Billy Jaz (talk) 21:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104519077Edit

The French Horn Steppingley (Q104519077): French Horn 7 Church End, Steppingley, MK45 5AU: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears to confuse two buildings - the pub is Q26431272, the address is for Church View House Peter James (talk) 00:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Q94998790Edit

Tawo (Q94998790): American rapper, singer-songwriter and actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It looked like he had articles in 2 WPs but now I see there is none. Could there be a mistake or some falsification? Or were they simply deleted? E4024 (talk) 15:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104762815Edit

Amir Hossein Mahmoudi (Q104762815): Iranian football player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Re-nominating - I don't think a merge is the best solution when dealing with mh6ti spam, because he invents and conflates people. we have no way of knowing if this scientific musical athlete even exists, let alone that they are the same person. and if he is a musician, is it the violinist or the dj. and is it the snooker player or the soccer player. did he participate in the olympic team or not. Quakewoody (talk) 17:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

{{done}} Redirect created by User:PLbot, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
  • I have undone a 2nd merge. Quakewoody (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete this as quickly as possible. It's being used to spread a hoax, which is obvious if you look at my recent edits and removals there that link to two different people (and a third completely different name!) Praxidicae (talk) 12:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Q6817323Edit

Menotti Lerro (Q6817323): Italian poet: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Lack of notability. Most books were self-published. Deletion was discussed in wikipedia: en.wiki, fr.wiki and ru.wiki - Discussions conducted to deletions. Files and deleted contents are from several Single-purpose accounts —Marie de France (talk) 03:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Yes, it is; from another writer and from a book (article was deleted like others of this author in wikipedia). --Marie de France (talk) 12:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Q102045659Edit

Karamjeet Madonna (Q102045659): Indian actress, dancer and singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam (as reported to me by User:MKar); those who can delete the attached Wikipedia pages/Commons files are asked to please do so Mahir256 (talk) 04:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

  •   Delete Their spam articles were deleted from 11 wikis and commons category (commons:Category:Karamjeet_Madonna) was deleted today. -- Eatcha (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep They have articles in seven Wikipedias. Please also give correct (complete) info when you open a deletion request. --E4024 (talk) 14:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
All articles are spam, Created by same user. Only 7 left out of 23. Delete it ASAP to discourage cross-wiki spamming. -- Eatcha (talk) 07:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   On hold Deletion on Wikipedia etc. must happen a priori. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Q80600327Edit

Vanessa Vallejo-Becerra (Q80600327): researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No references, no sitelinks. Non-notable. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Q59483862Edit

Soulaimane Berrada (Q59483862): Franco-Moroccan actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The item contains no data, or is blank. --105.158.194.200 21:14, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I ask you to delete this page because it does not contain valid data, and does not respect the standards of notoriety for the actors. --197.253.222.37 13:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Sébastien dionne cohen

Q26703626Edit

Alex Elias (Q26703626): Technology Entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 22:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Q105071295Edit

Q105071295: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this notable? can this be fixed? Quakewoody (talk) 23:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Q105071356Edit

In conversation with Van Gogh's humanity (Q105071356): literary work by Rinaldo Froldi: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this notable? can this be fixed? Quakewoody (talk) 23:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Q103818698Edit

Julie Ringuette (Q103818698): Canadian actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability Quakewoody (talk) 01:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

  Keep She seem to have some role between 2012 and 2015 [3]. Play a caracter in 30 vies (Q2816084) and Q16655273. --Fralambert (talk) 02:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
In my opinion, she does not miss the relevance criteria. Her entry can be occupied by several IDs and thus it fulfills point 2 of the relevance criteria.   Keep --Gymnicus (talk) 22:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105077139Edit

critical studies and experimental practices (Q105077139): masters degree: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not an academic field that makes sense to create an item for. Categerhart (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104993792Edit

Josh Wood (Q104993792): British television and film producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I created this item, but can't find independent verification that this Josh Wood is notable. Questionable information is found in user-edited sites like IMDB and Facebook. --Ghouston (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

  • it is an old IMDb, so it isn't like some of these guys who make the same profiles across the internet all on the same day. But, it does seem odd that someone would have credits starting at 17. However, the biography says he started as an intern, which would then explain the age thing. And then you have to figure that there are 34 people named Josh Wood on IMDb, and more if you include variations like Joshua, which could easily explain some conflation. Basically I said a whole lot of nothing just to get to   Delete. But it wouldn't be right for me just to delete it without making those points first. Quakewoody (talk) 05:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Q72739323Edit

Q72739323: family name (Александрова): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Одно и тоже с Q30836988 Александр Миронов 1954 (talk) 11:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Again:

No need for deletion, no need for merge. --Emu (talk) 12:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Q105078407Edit

Category:Travelogue photo by writer Intobesa (Q105078407): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable, only connected with user related category on Commons NinjaStrikers «» 11:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

  • Hello Related to this category, I have never written and try to write it if it goes wrong, I'm sorry, I don't know how to use it. If this problem is solved please fix it too if there is a way to use it advise me. I have been using Wikipedia for a year closer and no one teaches me but myself if this issue is not allowed and it is not okay then it is fine, I just tried it but was it a mistake I didn't know myself if something goes wrong, I apologize if, I can fix it please fix it Thank you Berry much.--咽頭べさ (talk) 12:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Q104916121Edit

Petra Plemlová (Q104916121): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Aranya (talk) 01:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:30, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
{{withdrawn}} creator (User:Ben Skála) has linked the item and it now fills a structural need. Sorry for the inconvenience. Aranya (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Structural need? I don't know why we would keep any of the linked items. Quakewoody (talk) 18:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Q61315203Edit

Cinépolis Brasil (Q61315203): Brazilian cinema network: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Já existe o item Q5686673 para este propósito João Justiceiro (talk) 03:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
  Keep item Q5686673 refers to the worldwide headquarters of the Cinépolis company. Its subsidiary, described in item Q61315203 (to be deleted), refers to the second largest Brazilian cinematographic exhibiting company, it is perfectly notable. Subsidiaries of a large company can also be remarkable, especially when they occupy such a large market share. Ajmcbarreto (talk) 12:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The brazilian Cinépolis, among others around the world, is not a split company. It was acquired (former Box Cinemas) and merged in 2011. João Justiceiro (talk) 03:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Delete 8439 english adjectives imported by GZWDer_flood despite no to bot requestEdit

The import was done in nov 2020. None of these items make any sense and the source WordData seems bogus/unreliable when it comes to adjectives. See the example adjective reasoning (L339763) which is not found in other dictionaries.

We who edit lexemes would like others to first seek approval before mass editing or adding lexemes because we have seen that there are many things that can go wrong.

All items are here: https://w.wiki/w7P CC @Nikki, GZWDer:--So9q (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

I am going to check other dictionaries and please wait for some time.--GZWDer (talk) 15:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
@So9q: Minus entries found in English Wiktionary, 1124 left (this is still not do be deleted for now, as I am going to filter it further).--GZWDer (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
  Wait leaning toward   Delete (given that on Wikidata talk:Lexicographical data the discussion went mostly nowhere...). All of this import are useless right now and most of them are not truly lexemes (being in a dictionary - Wiktionary or not - is not enough to be a Lexemes), at the very least a *lot* of cleaning is needed. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: The category I compared with is wikt:Category:English adjectives, which contains only lexeme (at least in Wiktionary's POV). Previously there are a number of English adverbs imported from Wiktionary, and they does not seems more reliable than 7315 (=8439-1124) adjectives matched.--GZWDer (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
@GZWDer: no, it obviously does not. Right at the beggining, I see 0D and 0d which is the same lexeme (not even by Wiktionary's POV, the second one explicitely says it the same lexeme as the first!). And just because other data are bad is not an excuse at all to add more bad data. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: I'm not planning to add more (without a discussion first), but previously there're some large import from Wiktionary, see Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/SixTwoEightBot.--GZWDer (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
@GZWDer: yes there was a lot of import ; this specific import was a bit poor but it seems to be mostly good. Sorry to be blunt but yours is mostly bad. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: My comment above said there are 7315 entries found in English Wiktionary and 1124 not found. Should we only focus on the latter?--GZWDer (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
@GZWDer: not sure to understand and we should focus and having good data (with a good source - en.wikt alone is not ideal, it should be cross-referenced with an other source - and a good data processing - for example adding at least one form). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: one of 19191 adverbs imported from Wiktionary and one of 7315 adjectives imported from WordData that may be found in Wiktionary. I think the only problematic thing is 1124 adjectives that can not be found in Wiktionary.--GZWDer (talk) 17:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Maybe this other import from the wiktionary should also be deleted then. VIGNERON (talk) 17:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I really hate using Wiktionary as a source (it is user-generated), but other sources may be not much better. Before importing a source, some discussion in Lexeme project talk page may be required.--GZWDer (talk) 18:33, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
@GZWDer: the best solution, especially for lexemes, is to cross multiple sources (timeo hominem unius libri). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Yeah there are a number of sources in the Internet, but 1. published dictionary often does not contain machine-readable part of speech information and 2. other online database may be not reliable.--GZWDer (talk) 09:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm curious what @SixTwoEight: thinks about their import and a possible deletion suggestion for that. I very recently wrote a best practice about referencing at least one form and the import from SixTwoEight does not seem to follow that (feel free to support, oppose or comment in the page with best practices so we can move forward as a community).--So9q (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@So9q: Just checked, it looks like my bot imports do have forms but they are unreferenced (see for instance L204117). I do think that it's a good idea to add referenced forms to bot-imported lexemes. I will see if I can add references to those adverbs I imported. (there is the minor issue that the reference should really be for the lexeme, not the form, but since that's not possible referencing a form should be close enough) --SixTwoEight (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks a bunch for your reply. :) Do you want help adding references? I made Wikidata:LexUse recently and if I tweak it a little and add Wikisource we could easily add a lot of references semi-automatically. Feel free to discuss in the github repo and open issues.--So9q (talk) 05:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Q59483862Edit

Soulaimane Berrada (Q59483862): Franco-Moroccan actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Bonjour, cette page ne répond pas aux critères de notoriété, pas de références. --105.159.1.146 15:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Sébastien dionne cohen

  Neutral notability is unclear / la notoriété n'est pas claire, ni dans un sens ni dans l'autre. @Sébastien dionne cohen: il y a une référence, merci de ne pas la supprimer (ni les autres données). PS: see also Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2019/04/11#Q59483862. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 16:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Q105089893Edit

City Plumbing (Q105089893): Plumbing supply chain in the United Kingdom, owned by Travis Perkins: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable spam with no sitelinks. --IWI (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Not spam - subsidiary of well known company, more than 350 branches according to https://www.ukhaulier.co.uk/news/road-transport/fleet/award-winning-city-plumbing-taps-into-bevan-group-build-quality-for-new-luton-van-fleet/ - item probably created for OSM Name Suggestion Index identifier (P8253). Peter James (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Q105094367Edit

Anthologie de la nouvelle prose francaise (Q105094367): An edition of Sagittarius at Simon Kra, 1926: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability BubblySnow  💬 12:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

  • If this fails, then the creator has created other similar items that should be looked at. Quakewoody (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Q97626591Edit

Iglesia de San Juan Bautista (Q97626591): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item is not longer valid and has null historic relevance. --Olea (talk) 12:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Q99029005Edit

Q99029005: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No label defined and it lacks of identifiers or references. --Ransara Jey (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
There's a Macedonian label (probably "Serbs in Koshari" or something similar), and a link from Koshari (Q3090929). It appears to be a combination of ethnic group and village, rather than a separate ethnic group, and would probably not be notable - or is this the usual structure of census data? The link is from Q3090929#P172, which has other items similar to this. Peter James (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Ambiguous Crossref journal stubsEdit

Someone bulk added (what they thought was) journals from a uncleaned Crossref dump. This was highly problematic as some of the resulting new items only included a title (these are often not unique), the Crossref journal ID (which is only an internal id that is not openly resolvable), and the statement "item is a scientific journal" (which is in many cases wrong).

Items with an internal Crossref id as their only identifier (and no other identifiers like ISSN or DOI) are a big problem: As the Crossref ids are internal there is no efficient and reliable way of applying these items (e.g. adding other identifiers) as a Wikidata editor.

And even worse, these items are usually of the lowest quality: Crossref is a DOI registry, so if there was no DOI (or ISSN) available in the Crossref data set, there is a high likelihood that there is a problem with what is identified in the first place, eg. these journals were planned, but not published in the end (or not published yet), they are duplicates (there are more than 20 Crossref ids [and thereby Q ids] for the same journal in the query alone), or they are no journals at all (e.g. there are even articles in the mix).

Here a SPARQL query ("items that have the internal Crossref id as their only external identifier") showing all of the items that are included in my request for deletion (3052 items at the time of writing this). Only the items in this query are part of the bulk deletion request: https://w.wiki/wyN

I checked that there are no relevant backlinks (Special:WhatLinksHere) to any of these items. That means Wikidata will definitely be a better place if all of these items are deleted. --Okami (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

John Vandenberg (talk) 09:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Aubrey (talk) 12:15, 11 December 2013 (UTC) Daniel Mietchen (talk) 12:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC) DarTar (talk) 01:37, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Maximilianklein (talk) 00:23, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Mvolz (talk) 08:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy 22:17, 27 July 2014 (UTC) Mattsenate (talk) 17:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC) author  TomT0m / talk page JakobVoss (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC) Mahdimoqri (talk) 08:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Jsamwrites Dig.log Sic19 (talk) 22:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Andreasmperu Nomen ad hoc Pete F (talk) 99of9 Mfchris84 (talk) 09:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC) Runner1928 (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2018 (UTC) Wittylama (talk) 09:55, 22 December 2018 (UTC) Jneubert (talk) 07:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC) --Juandev (talk) 20:28, 27 April 2019 (UTC) VIGNERON (talk) Uomovariabile (talk to me) 08:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC) SilentSpike (talk) Ecritures (talk) Tfrancart (talk) Dick Bos (talk) 10:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC) --Rdmpage (talk) 09:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Clifford Anderson (talk) 15:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC) Parobis1 (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Susanna Giaccai (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2020 (UTC) Zblace (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC) Alessandra.Moi (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC) ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC) Alessandra Boccone (talk) 10:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC) Erfurth (talk) 20:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)  Notified participants of WikiProject Periodicals

@GZWDer: for your info --- Jura 14:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Leaning for   Delete as we cannot improve this item. For instance, on Insight Turkey (Q96709518), there is said to be the same as (P460) = Insight Turkey (Q6038114) but we have no way of knowing if it's indeed the same journal or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
I agree! This looks like a massive dump of completely unverifiable information. Alright that you detected this, @Okami! --Dick Bos (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
There is a DOI for Q96709618, and it redirects to the same URL as the DOI for Q6038114. The only difference is for Q96709618 the ISSNs are missing and the DOI has an additional ".2020221" at the end - not sure of the purpose of that unless it's to link a specific issue or article. There is https://www.insightturkey.com/issues/2020/22/1 but the DOI doesn't redirect to that. Peter James (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Q96704985, Q96704988, Q96704990 can be deleted as the Crossref data just says "Deleted". Peter James (talk) 18:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Some of these can be improved, for example Landscape Architecture (Q96724106) is not the same as Landscape Architecture (Q96331023). Was there a reason the DOIs were not added? Peter James (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Thx @Dick Bos! :) --Okami (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
@Peter James: Some of these could in deed be improved theoretically. I started with this task in mind actually. But I soon realized that this was not a useful task for anyone to invest in. By the way: The examples that you give (Landscape Architecture (Q96724106) and Landscape Architecture (Q96331023)) are not in the list of items that I suggested for deletion (no problem there as they do contain additional external identifiers like ISSN). --Okami (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
There are also some entries in Crossref with "Crossref Test" as publisher - I made a list at User:Peter James/8. Some were added to existing items, others are new, and some of the new items combine other sources and have the "test" title from Crossref as the label and the correct title in statements. These identifiers should probably be deprecated, but some appear to have valid data - what should I use as the reason for deprecation? Others have been added where Crossref has no data, for example "60429" was added to Q14293915 but Crossref has "Test deposits" with ISSN 11111111. Peter James (talk) 22:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Interesting! That means this data import was even more problematic than I thought. To be honest, this request here is also a test balloon for requesting the deletion of Crossref journal ID (P8375) in the next step. This ID is treated as an internal ID even by Crossref itself. [4] That is probably why there is no public resolver for this ID (which is actually called "publication ID" in their documentation). For Crossref itself the proper IDs to search and resolve for are ISSNs and of course DOIs. I am interested in your thoughts about this. As I see it: An external non-public identifier is hard to maintain for the Wikidata community (there are probably a lot of faulty claims already). As this is an *internal ID of the Crossref system* only, there is not even a real use cases for this property. In my opinion it makes little sense for the Wikidata Community to maintain that property. But first I would like to see how step 1 goes (this request for deletion). --Okami (talk) 23:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Of those items I found 28 items that can be deleted as they only refer to test data; the list is at User:Peter James/8#Delete and includes four where ISSNs are in the data but are not valid or have not been issued. Peter James (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
I have made separate deletion requests for these 28 items[5]. Peter James (talk) 23:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
All Crossref entries are imported based on a request at Wikidata:Bot_requests/Archive/2020/07#Crossref_Journals. Feel free to delete any of these if there are no valid articles in Crossref referring to that journal ID.--GZWDer (talk) 09:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the link to that discussion @GZWDer! From what I read there the original intent was to (only) include journals that have an ISSN associated to them. This makes a lot of sense. My request here is to delete only those items without publicly resolvable identifiers. All imported journals that include ISSN, DOI or other identifiers were not included in my request for deletion (see query above). --Okami (talk) 10:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Crossref provided a list of entries that is used as source of import. Another issue is there are a Mix'n'Match catalog and errorous ISNIs may be added to Wikidata via this catalog (such as the Q14293915 example above). Luckily the match is mostly complete.--GZWDer (talk) 17:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Q97311384Edit

Q97311384: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Formerly a redirect sitelink, now an empty item Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 16:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

I added a Commons category, which contains another category Großräschen pier (Q73536707) but I'm not sure if that's part of Q97311384 or just at the same location. Peter James (talk) 18:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Q105148900Edit

Mehdi Tahmasebi (Q105148900): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Article on enwiki deleted; fails notability. Nathan2055talk - contribs 03:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105153911Edit

Amir Hossein Naeij (Q105153911): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Article on enwiki deleted; fails notability. Nathan2055talk - contribs 03:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105160143Edit

L-Cysteine (Q105160143): amino acid: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. (`・ω・´) (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Delete Our entry for Cysteine is the very same L-Cysteine, in theory we could have entries for the two conformational isomers for each amino acid, but so far we do not. --RAN (talk) 22:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  • L-Cysteine (Q186474) is L-Cysteine, it looks like some aliases for that item and for Q105160143 shouldn't be there (such as D-Cysteine). There are also D-Cysteine (Q16633812) and DL-cysteine (Q27089394). cysteine (Q66589547) is probably a duplicate of one of these, but there is not enough there to determine which, and the identifier doesn't have a link. Peter James (talk) 10:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105180470Edit

Simply Mac (Q105180470): US-based retail chain focusing on Apple products: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Rockpeterson (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

It only has a section in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GameStop#Simply_Mac but there are references; also has OSM Name Suggestion Index identifier (P8253). Peter James (talk) 21:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105226029Edit

Raphaël Dewaerseghers (Q105226029): Belgian actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No have notable. (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105247454Edit

Abuhena Saif Ul Islam (Q105247454): US chaplain: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

For two unnecessary images at Commons a WD item has been opened for an unnotable military chaplain. I also want to open an item for our "mahalle" imam and can make him a cat and gallery in Commons but he is not notable. Just like this chap. I know we give importance to having a Commons cat. (I defended it several times; but supposing that people open Commons cats for people who have some notability.) BTW this WD item is opened because I asked the deletion of the nonsense Commons cat. Whatever. E4024 (talk) 01:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep for now, wait to see if the Commons category is deleted or not. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  • More pictures found. I made a better cat for him although I still think he is not notable and out of scope. Commons makes cats for people (who are sometimes out of scope) only with the aim of bringing together their files; sometimes even for the purpose of deleting them altogether. I myself have done this, for some Servet (forgot surname) guy from Turkey and an Indonesian teenager who thought she was an actress. As both the files and their cats were deleted I cannot link them now. --E4024 (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Q16206224Edit

Malcolm Cross (Q16206224): Conflation: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Mess of data from Q96021878 and Q96021879. —putnik 13:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Q42297077Edit

Little Clive River (Q42297077): tributary of the Patten River in Cochrane District, Northeastern Ontario, Canada: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The river is absent of any geographical database. Deleted on frwiki ans enwiki for it's absence of source. Fralambert (talk) 13:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Q28968053Edit

Aryan Ashik (Q28968053): Media personality: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Cross wiki spam Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105293493Edit

Third Coast Grappling (Q105293493): Grappling promotion: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Brand Promotion BubblySnow  💬 05:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

  • many of the items created by this user are questionable. Quakewoody (talk) 11:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Just trying to build out grappling/Brazilian jiu-jitsu information throughout wikidata. Third Coast Grappling is one of the few promotions in the sport that has still been running events. Additionally, Gordon Ryan (one of the top athletes within the sport) has competed in their events as recently as last year (Gordon's Wikipedia). Not affiliated with them at all - just a fan of the sport! I was going to add events similarly to how I have done with Fight 2 Win and ADCC. If I am doing something wrong, please let me know. Thanks! --5V9vPY4c (talk) 14:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Wouldn't it make more sense to build your own database, and then see if WD wants to include it instead of just assuming that WD wants to keep track of your data for you. Quakewoody (talk) 17:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
  • I'm not really building the BJJ database in WD from scratch. A lot of my edits have been adding context to pre-existing pages that were missing. Any of my edits/creations have been modelled after other sports in WD such as cycling and traditional combat sports (UFC). If the admins want to delete Q105293493 or anything else that is not up to their standards, that is fine by me. I'm not tied to anything specifically/trying to promote any brand, but just trying to piece by piece add to WD as a lot of it is incomplete currently. --5V9vPY4c (talk) 19:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Q55409936Edit

Dmitry Kravchuk (Q55409936): entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Baby come (talk) 19:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep notable per Wikidat rules. Also, see previous deletion requests : Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2020/09/25#Bulk_deletion_request_2 and Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/09/27#Q55409936 (by the same @Baby come:). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105315318Edit

Paula Curcuru (Q105315318): Talent manager: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

also Q105314831Edit

+Prestige Management Group (Q105314831): Talent Management Firm: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Alexhuff13 (talk) 07:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Judging by the fact that the only link is from Prestige Management Group (Q105314831) which in turn is linked by none,   Delete the two items. (I added the latter to the nomination.) No search results turn up other than the two items for the names within Wikidata. I googled the names for sources to support potential Wikipedia notability, and found little. whym (talk) 14:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Q99857708Edit

Zac Turner (Q99857708): researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, spam, Advertising Baby come (talk) 17:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

  Keep Just one of the many many many scientists on Wikidata who've been imported from the ORCID database. --1Veertje (talk) 18:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
No, it wasn't 'imported'. It was manually added - four days after the ORCID was created by 2 new WMF accounts who have since disappeared. The ORCID is blank (other than an education history). The WD item has no incoming papers. ORCID, while a good starting point, is nothing more than another WIKI. Quakewoody (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
OCID-id's are imported fairly indiscriminately so it would only be a matter of time before this item was recreated. --1Veertje (talk) 09:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
And the SEO spammers know this, which is why they open ORCIDs for people who have no legitimate reason to have an ORCID. The ORCID is blank. WD has no articles relating to this man. Quakewoody (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Q98373186Edit

Divya Mohanty (Q98373186): Indian actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No Label Defined Auramstate (talk) 09:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
@Auramstate:, she is an Indian actress did two big films in Odia language. There was the lable in Odia language. How can't you find the label? -Sangram Keshari Senapati (Gapu) (talk) 15:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
@Ssgapu22:, I just visit your User work history, This (Q98373186) entity did not have any Entity label before some minutes. Due to your incomplete work, there are some problems for other contributors. Please make sure to give an entry's name before Create a new Item, and this has happened to me: please check https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q105355923. As per Wikidata, you have to give an entity name before contributing your data not only QID. It will confuse others.
Request to admin please make sure to keep one entity: Q98373186 or Q105355923 or merge both. ( i don't want to provide duplicate data) So I request to delate incomplete QID. That's all. ThanksAuramstate (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
@Auramstate:, Divya Mohanty started her career in the Odia industry, so while creating the item Odia label was there. Without a label name, we may not create an item. So, there was a label name, but not in English, which is your point may be. At that time, when it was created, at that time there was no IMDB id also, so it was not there. Another thing, when you found there was an existing item, then you should have merged the new one to the old item. Before putting a deletion request, you should have checked the interlinks also. -Sangram Keshari Senapati (Gapu) (talk) 17:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Q40701823Edit

Tandonia sp. (Q40701823): species of mollusc: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Invalid Termininja (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Q81791838Edit

Foreword to Per scelta, per caso. Oltre l'Actors Studio by John Strasberg (Q81791838): foreword written by Giovanni Morassutti to the Italian edition of Accidentally on purpose : Reflections on Life, Acting and the Nine Natural Laws of Creativity by John Strasberg: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Foreword of a book isn't encyclopedic in the slightest, just another attempt to spam the artist crosswiki Praxidicae (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  Delete. — This item (Foreword to Per scelta, per caso. Oltre l'Actors Studio by John Strasberg (Q81791838) is linked from its author's item (Giovanni Morassutti (Q47538364)), using the property notable work (P800). — Delete per Praxidicae, and WD:Books, a foreword (Q1358138) is not its own entity. The edition item (FRBR expression/manifestation level) can have the property author of foreword (P2679) for the introducer (Q98196947)'s name. I can add the property to Per scelta, per caso. Oltre l'Actors Studio (Q63142571), or a new edition item, instead of Q81791838's incorrect use of has part (P527) for 63142571 — Dcflyer (talk) 14:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105380430Edit

OTOEPHUE (Q105380430): Record label: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Brand Promotion BubblySnow  💬 06:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Delete I am not prepared to give an opinion yet (and I have a busy morning, which means I won't get to it until this evening). At this point, all I know is it (a record label) has released an album from someone with an article. I see no reason to keep this. I suspect this is a label created by a "past his prime" musician who couldn't get a major label to release his music, but no one has come out to say it. Quakewoody (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Quakewoody (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Q55830146Edit

Kazilhões (Q55830146): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-insert (see edit history), non-notable. --Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

  • The Corsican article and the WM Commons category have to be deleted first. --Wolverène (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105407148Edit

Mariko Gordon (Q105407148): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No - Notability BubblySnow  💬 12:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  • There is a string of non-notable connected items that should also be deleted. I stopped clicking at 4. Quakewoody (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105407055Edit

Candess Campbell (Q105407055): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No have notable. (`・ω・´) (talk) 12:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Q98045385Edit

MonkeyBear and Friends (Q98045385): 1981 American TV show: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is probably a hoax, as in the television show is not real and never aired on TV. The article on Simple English was deleted as a hoax in January 2021. Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

  • this item never had a simple english article associated with it. But, if what you say is true, then I would certainly want the editor's other creations investigated as well. Quakewoody (talk) 03:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105419316Edit

Nidhish Kutty (Q105419316): Indian child actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Minorax (talk) 08:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

  • It needs filled in, but I am willing to give it a   Keep. According to Wikipedia, he is the star of Q104157183. Quakewoody (talk) 14:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Q102313347Edit

.NET (Q102313347): software platform developed by Microsoft: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty --93.35.184.189 08:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Is not empty any longer (I reverted your vandalism). I don't know if it passes notability, but it is not blank. Quakewoody (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Isn't .NET (Q21622213): free and open-source software platform developed by the .NET Foundation is the same subject? Just because .NET (formerly called as .NET Core) is basically the successor of the older .NET Framework (Q5289), with the 5.x series.

Also, there's no distinction between the Windows and and Linux / macOS / etc. versions AFAIK. --CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Q987785Edit

Q987785: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 15:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105443181Edit

Sarah Hall-Khlifi (Q105443181): Costume designer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 01:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104815733Edit

Suhail Hasan (Q104815733): British entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 08:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

  • The item was prevousely nomitaned for deletion and the result was keep. See here User:Shwn

Q96336831Edit

Gaichenko Andriy Vitaliyovych (Q96336831): Ukrainian jurist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as above Renvoy (talk) 11:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

See WD:N 2. "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." The person is deputy minister and there are many serious and publicly available references about him --Perohanych (talk) 12:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Article was deleted from Ukrainian Wikipedia due to lack of notability, "publicly available references" are not shown in the element, the general absence of valid sitelinks is clear evidence of non notability.--Renvoy (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Renvoy: "the general absence of valid sitelinks is clear evidence of non notability" this is not how WD:N works, please read item 2 there. --Hannes Röst (talk) 16:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep passes Wikidata notability, reference is a Ukranian Government website [6]https://minjust.gov.ua/people/haichenko-andrii Piecesofuk (talk) 13:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Q19096867Edit

Retail Clerks International Association, Local 1625 v. Schermerhorn (Q19096867): Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Probably a duplicate, not specific enough to know for sure. looks like user bot created a lot of duplicates but is no longer active? Crystal Clements, University of Washington Libraries (talk) 19:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

It's a disambiguation page for two court cases; the part after the comma was missing. The other items are three court cases, including the two this disambiguates. Peter James (talk) 11:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Q18663259Edit

genotoxicity (Q18663259): the property of chemical agents that damages the genetic information within a cell causing mutations, which may lead to cancer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same term and concept as Q1009245 UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  • It looks like the ZH-wiki items need to be merged first, then the Wikidata entries merged. --RAN (talk) 02:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Q67173541Edit

Ukko (Q67173541): German Wikipedian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Haansn08 (talk) 12:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Q68482655Edit

Petr Losert (Q68482655): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Haansn08 (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 4 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Czech wikimedian, who translated severals texts for Wikisource. Stated as translator (P655) in these items. JAn Dudík (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Q72932755Edit

Emil Cerda (Q72932755): Dominican writer and orator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Emil Cerda doesn't have an article on the English Wikipedia and a draft on him has been the subject of paid editing over the past few years. The remaining articles on him on the Welsh and Romanian Wikipedia are subject to deletion right now as cross-wiki spam. Most of the images of him on the Commons have been deleted as self-promotional and the remaining ones are now nominated for deletion.

--Liz (talk) 02:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105486517Edit

Aarón Martínez (Q105486517): Chilean author, composer and performer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Es wiki is on deletion Alexhuff13 (talk) 07:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep I removed the speedy tag. If ESWP wants to delete it, let them discuss it. As far as WD is concerned, if the article disappears, I feel as if I can get at least a "structural need" out of this guy. More may be difficult due to language issues, as well as him having a 'common' name - sifting through 46,000,000 Aaron Martinez web hits may take time. Quakewoody (talk) 13:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105518796Edit

New Wave Mobile (Q105518796): Danish software company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 13:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105519130Edit

Citypedia (Q105519130): Mobile app by New Wave Mobile: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability. Sun8908 💬 14:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105519442Edit

Conglomerate of Laniakea and Perseus-Pisces (Q105519442): Cosmic structure formed by Laniakea and Perseus-Pisces: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It is repeated more than four times in several small languages.
I shouldn't have created it, please delete it. --Erickespinal26 (talk) 14:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

It's connected to eswiki. Euro know (talk) 10:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105502021Edit

Q105502021: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Typo--XoMEoX (talk) 10:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

  • errors can be fixed. So, then, the question becomes - is this notable? Quakewoody (talk) 13:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105519442Edit

Conglomerate of Laniakea and Perseus-Pisces (Q105519442): Cosmic structure formed by Laniakea and Perseus-Pisces: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I just did totally wrong, it was a finger mistake, I'm so sorry, I'm just trying to help. I had to create it directly from the respective article. --Erickespinal26 (talk) 23:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Errors can be fixed. So, then, the question is - is it notable? Quakewoody (talk) 23:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
    • If it is noticeable and I think it would be better to remove it. Erickespinal26 (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  • First of all I created it. Second there are four of the same. Third, only two can function. Fourth, it is easier to request the removal of the creator. There are four of the same in other languages. Please Quakewoody help me remove it. Erickespinal26 (talk) 03:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Q15715731Edit

Template:Infobox Wikidata (Q15715731): Wikimedia template: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test item for template, should use the Sandbox instead of this item if necessary. Elliot321 (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
It has a sitelink, there are probably others to be moved from Template:Wikidata Infobox (Q47517487). Peter James (talk) 10:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Q20429372Edit

Ionuț Silaghi de Oaș (Q20429372): Romanian singer-songwriter, producer, author, and current head of the Szilágyi-Oaș noble family.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Part of mass cross-wiki spam. --IWI (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105395156Edit

Shubham Singh (Q105395156): Indian Entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wait for local deletion मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 07:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  • The credits on IMDb are real. But they do not belong to this child. The listing was hijacked. Quakewoody (talk) 22:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105094405Edit

R•NØ (Q105094405): Belgium DJ: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability displayed Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 12:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Q87949942Edit

Didier Mickaël Fontaine (Q87949942): Writer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Didier Fontaine is a french engineer who has written two books as author's account. He has no link with an university. The author of his page, is the same that inserted his mention in several wiki in different languages. --Amargor (talk) 14:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep wikidata notability is much different from Wikipedia, and wikidata only cares that it exists, not that it is widespread, not a hoax, so we ask for outside links to show he is real. This is one of the many many many scientists on Wikidata who've been imported from the ORCID database. The item for a real, existing person/entity who is a writer with standard identifiers from standard platforms.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 19:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q96994506Edit

Bantey (Q96994506): Nigerian musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability Quakewoody (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  Keep Meets Wikidata notability criteria. The item for a real, existing person/entity who is a musician with standard identifiers from standard music platforms. The item "refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." --Smallison (talk) 18:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Facebook isn't an identifier. Quakewoody (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  • This individual is an actual person, a musician, that can be verified with music on several platforms and a small group of articles in the press. This is not someone simply posting a live video on Facebook. I am unsure as to why you, Quakewoody, believe Wikidata notability has not been met. Wikidata does not have the same notability criteria as Wikipedia.--Smallison (talk) 02:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • The phonebook argument doesn't work. Quakewoody (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
This is not a phonebook argument. This is following Wikidata criteria. --Smallison (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
This is the phone book argument. Because it takes more than simply being listed in the phonebook to be considered notable even though the phonebook is a serious and publicly available reference. Quakewoody (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  Delete All external identifiers are instances of Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320), so there are currently no external identifiers that undoubtedly imply notability. Same for the two references one of which linking to Yahoo! Finance which states that the article was copied from Accesswire, the other being Accesswire itself which even provides a handy „Tell My Story“-button in the header. --Nw520 (talk) 00:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep wikidata notability is much different from Wikipedia @Quakewoody. Seems like you have interest of conflict on other subjects as well like queer topics get it together ASAP. Katkwo1993 (talk)

Q10816094Edit

place name (Q10816094): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same concept as toponym Q7884789 UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 20:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104546567Edit

Niklas Fiekas (Q104546567): software developer and chess player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Neither FIDE ID nor Github username justify relevance. Steak (talk) 10:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
I somehow got interrupted when creating this item and forgot to create the statement that implies notability. He is one of the two developers of Lichess (Q19831807) and the sole developer of its distributed analysis software. I added the respective statements. This item should now clearly fulfill notability criterion 3. -- Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 11:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104698213Edit

John G Ludwig (Q104698213): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable (FIDE profile is not sufficient). Steak (talk) 10:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104698208Edit

Illya Lotvin (Q104698208): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable (FIDE profile is not sufficient). Steak (talk) 10:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104698202Edit

Richard Berendsen (Q104698202): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable (FIDE profile is not sufficient). Steak (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104698210Edit

Konstantin Urban (Q104698210): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable (FIDE profile is not sufficient). Steak (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104698199Edit

Alexey Bespalov (Q104698199): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable (FIDE profile is not sufficient). Steak (talk) 10:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Q101780308Edit

Oliver Nill (Q101780308): German chess player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable (FIDE profile is not sufficient). Steak (talk) 11:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment has there been a ruling somewhere with consensus to delete all these entries? We should have a ruling, then if !vote delete confirmed, have a bot delete every entry with only a FIDE entry, instead of ad hoc deletion of one here and there. --RAN (talk) 03:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
We are tracking these non-notable chess players with the first query here. There are a few edge cases that are notable despite listed in the query result, but especially these recently created items are definitely not notable. So the request here is not "ad hoc" as you say, but "upon need" when there is a significant amount of new and not-notable players. Steak (talk) 07:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105553273Edit

AN Inc. (Q105553273): Consulting Firm: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Minorax (talk) 13:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105549261Edit

Q105549261: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test item, no useful content to merge Minorax (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  • what is the Wikiversity link? I can't read it to determine what it is or if it needs tagged for deletion. Quakewoody (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Q97155800Edit

Junts per Catalunya (Q97155800): Catalan political party: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Error MAGHOI (talk) 15:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep Can you explain what kind of error? Junts per Catalunya is a political party founded in 2018 which participated in 2021 Catalan parliament election (Q48838589). Different from a political coalition with the same name active in 2017-2021. --Davidpar (talk) 15:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Q20102821Edit

coat of arms of Trujillo Alto (Q20102821): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This unnecessary item was created by user who was blocked for creating tons of unneeded items. User:GZWDer_(flood) - the item is not needed. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 18:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • It has a WP article. How is the item unnecessary? Quakewoody (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
The WP article item number is Q1150895. Q1150895 has all the articles for Trujillo Alto including the language "CA" ... But this unneeded item is going to a section of the CA Trujillo Alto article. Q20102821 is pointing to a section of an article, not to an article. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep Separate entities. The item is about the Coat of Arms. It's article was redirected to a specific section of the town's article, not the town's article in general. Quakewoody (talk) 02:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Why is there a separate item for a coat of arms of a municipality? Is that something that all places have? I mean should all places have a separate item for their coat of arms or just Trujillo Alto? Many of the items created by this user were questionable and I've never seen something like this before. Thanks! --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 04:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep --Katkwo1993 (talk) 13:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105399373Edit

‪Amir Mahmoudi (Q105399373): University professor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Notabil wikitar (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  • So suspicious. This is a name that mh6ti likes to troll us with. The IP that created the item is a mh6ti IP (IPv6 should have been range blocked long ago). And the user account that nominated it is only 5 minutes old. But look at all of the identifiers and the data they contain. Quakewoody (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Quakewoody Unless the request to delete has anything to do with creating an account, I am a wiki user and I wanted to report anonymously without identifying myself. Now, where is the problem? I think you are unaware that you are blocked in several languages ​​due to game backup. You yourself are an open Socks like Mh6ti.:)--Notabil wikitar (talk) 22:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep valid identifiers for a published author. --RAN (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Agreed, however, because of the troll farm which has created the item as well as nominated it (playing good cop, bad cop), is notorious for creating backstops for their spamming purposes. Therefore, we need to verify those links AND the data they contain. Yes, that means trying to figure out of this guy actually published 50 scientific papers or if it is just more made up non-sense. Quakewoody (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep, ORCIDator added now plenty of articles. Matlin (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105426831Edit

Ramy Khodeir (Q105426831): American musician and actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

LTA. still fails notability. nothing new has been presented from any of the numerous times it has been deleted. the restore shouldn't have happened. Quakewoody (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Ayack you restored this, would you like the chance to reconsider your decision? Quakewoody (talk) 22:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • It may be that data objects have already been created here several times for Ramy Khodeir. But you also have to be honest that the respective data object was not filled with a lot of information during these creations. This can also be seen in this data object if you look at the version from 14 February 2020. Due to this version, the data object was also deleted by Bencemac. I then asked for the possibility of expanding the data object. In my opinion, I have succeeded in doing this. Bencemac had said in this discussion that he deleted the data object because the data object had no IDs. But after the expansion of Quakewoody and me, this is no longer the case. The IDs IMDb ID (P345), MusicBrainz artist ID (P434) and Genius artist ID (P2373) were added. That is why I personally see no reason why this data object should no longer exist here.   Keep --Gymnicus (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • It was filled out better in some of those deleted items than it is now. We still deleted it. Quakewoody (talk) 22:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
@Quakewoody: Aha, then this data object should also be restored and then merged with the current object. --Gymnicus (talk) 22:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Or, we delete this like we have the items, articles, images, categories, and etc. Quakewoody (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
To do this, you would first have to explain why it fails to be remarkable. You haven't done that before. Just saying “Not notable”, like last time, is not a reason for deletion for me. --Gymnicus (talk) 23:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
It fails notability. There is nothing else to explain. Nothing posted is notable. The things you (and I) didn't post that were posted before are not notable. This is not a notable subject. In fact, the opposite is true, it is up to you to explain why you think a Facebook page makes him notable. Quakewoody (talk) 23:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
@Quakewoody: I have already written my reason why I want to keep the data object, and my reason is as far as it is consistent with Ayak's reasoning. Criterion 2 is fulfilled by the IDs IMDb ID (P345), MusicBrainz artist ID (P434) and Genius artist ID (P2373). The Facebook, Twitter and Instagram accounts are only secondary to my justification. --Gymnicus (talk) 09:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
An item is notable if "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." (Criteria 2). Here we have several external identifiers (IMDB, MusicBrainz, etc.) so, for me, it is notable. Ayack (talk) 08:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
@Ayack IMDb and MusicBrainz are wikis. And to prove that point - I did not know that you were a notable french DJ. Would you like a WD item? I will make you one if you want. I can also create an IMDb that corresponds with the music video you made for the album.
Don't worry, I will delete that MB listing before it goes viral and they assign you an Knowledge Graph, ISNI, or VIAF. I am just trying to demonstrate how easy it is to be listed at these "serious and publicly available references'. Quakewoody (talk) 14:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep Quakewoody you seem to not understand Wikidata notability criteria. Just because someone can add an item to Musicbrainz does not make it invalid or not denote notability. VIAF IDs cannot just be added by anyone. I really do not understand the compulsion to delete items that are fully filled out, refer to real things, and have external identifiers. There are many valid reasons for including these items in Wikidata. "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references."--Smallison (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Correct, ISNI and VIAF are not wikis. However, there are ways to 'make' an ISNI and VIAF and etc. I am not going to tell you (or anyone else) how, because the spammers who haven't figured it out will take the information and create listings. But, as I have stated numerous times, they have made it perfectly clear that they are expanding people they identify - including anyone with a YouTube account (their words, not my straw man interpretation). Do you really think anyone with a YouTube account (which is anyone with a Google account) qualifies for Wikidata? Besides, this entire paragraph is moot because I didn't say I would make him an ISNI. I said I would re... I am not going to repeat it, it is written right there for the world to see what I said. Plus, did you even click on that link? Does that album exist? No, I just made it up. Is he an actual DJ Mix Master? Technically, the answer is, I don't know what he does in his spare time. But I made it up as well. Just to prove the point.
Ramy Khodeir has been deleted numerous times across numerous projects. He is globally blocked because of it. Many of the items listed above were filled in much better, but he didn't pass. Why should he pass now? With half the amount of identifiers, most of which I added to prove the point - he's got 16 Spotify listeners and 110 Twitter followers. I've gained more than that in the last 24 hours simply because I voted to delete some non-notable homosexual content on WMF. They've been trolling me ever since. You think this guy is notable! Quakewoody (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
@Quakewoody: You have only added the ID Genius artist ID (P2373) MusicBrainz artist ID (P434) and with this you now want to show that it can be deleted. Unfortunately, in contrast to your imaginary WP Ayack, there is not only this one ID for Ramy Khodeir, but also the IDS IMDb ID (P345) and MusicBrainz artist ID (P434) Genius artist ID (P2373). Also, Ramy Khodier's album really exists, as you can see on Spotify. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC) — I accidentally swapped the links. Therefore subsequent adjustment of my contribution. --Gymnicus (talk) 08:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
@Quakewoody: To clarify, I'm not sure what you are trying to prove, or why you would go to such lengths. I'm seeking clarity on your actions regarding notability. Is this the place/item to do it? Perhaps not. There are zero ways a non-professional metadata person can make a VIAF ID. This is stringently formulated bibliographic data and should always be taken as a clear marker of notability. Equally, Musicbrainz and other similar sources of identifiers are important sources in the metadata ecosystem. What I am seeking is a recognition that "notability" can be approached in a generous way. Does that mean there isn't "spam"? No. But I think it's really important to recognize that Wikidata can be a really key part in documenting culture through data in a way that cannot be done through writing Wikipedia articles. --Smallison (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep Matlin (talk) 18:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Q56258142Edit

Q56258142: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It doesn't seem to exist, all results on Google are about this item/Wiki Loves Monuments list. Its Wiki Loves Monuments code is a duplicate of Pasture shelter in Cainallo (Q30055423) Ferdi2005[Mail] 16:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

They had different codes in 2016 and these were used as identifiers; when they changed in 2018 these two were given the same code and the identifiers were changed, but instead of adding them they replaced the old identifiers keeping the start date of 2016. One of them needs a new identifier from Wiki Loves Monuments. https://pietro.pensa.it/Itinerario_da_Esino_Lario_a_Monte_Croce mentions something with a similar name - could it be that there is another spelling that is usually used, or something within the scope of Wiki Loves Monuments but otherwise not written about. Peter James (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105446458Edit

Subversive Sirens (Q105446458): Minneapolis based synchronized swim team: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable. No site links. --IWI (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

  • In the spirit of transparency, this does/did have an article somewhere. It isn't linked, but I remember seeing it. Delete the item if we can't find the article (or it has been deleted). Keep the item if it has an article (obviously), but then try to have the article removedif you feel it also fails notability (and if you don't mind being doxed again). Quakewoody (talk) 21:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
    I have nothing to hide. I was not aware of an article. Presumably if it is no longer here, it was deleted. --IWI (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep as passes Wikidata notability, plenty of articles in Google News Piecesofuk (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep per Piecesofuk. -Yupik (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  Comment: this is yet another RfD by Iwi for items added by User:QueerSport and I'm wondering when the targeting will stop. So far the RfDs Iwi started on Commons, Simple Wikipedia, and the Serbian Wikipedia have failed. User:Quakewoody then tried again to get the articles deleted off the Serbian wp and also off the Croatian wp. -Yupik (talk) 01:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
@Yupik: I'd like you to clarify what you mean by this comment, and how it is relevant to determining notability. I saw the item with no site links and couldn’t find much coverage, so I nominated it. --IWI (talk) 12:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep Matlin (talk) 14:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105086982Edit

Aleksandra Stromecka-Gontarek (Q105086982): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion. E4024 (talk) 04:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  Keep Nope, because the subject of this item is dead (she can not promote herself while she is dead, see draft of article about her), and there are files in Commons linking to this item. Matlin (talk) 07:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Sorry. RIP. Still I fail to see the notability. Of course if Polish or any other WP finds her notable then the item may stay. Was it a natural death if may ask you? (If she had a violent death of course that is something different, that is why I ask it, other than for personal curiosity.) --E4024 (talk) 14:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Q47486402Edit

Ibrahim Bardhi (Q47486402): Albanian politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Bardhi, he is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  Keep Notableness in Wikidata isn't the same a notableness in Wikipedia. Matlin (talk) 18:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  Delete I don't see how any of the points at WD:N are fulfiled. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references.

Google Knowledge Graph is this refer. Matlin (talk) 10:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Google Knowledge Graph ID (P2671) is marked as Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104914475Edit

Imane Akandouch Aouattah (Q104914475): Massinissa's sister: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable --Palotabarát (talk) 16:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104914490Edit

Nassim Akandouch Aouattah (Q104914490): Massinissa's brother: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable --Palotabarát (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep Linking to notable item. Matlin (talk) 18:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Q20102821Edit

coat of arms of Trujillo Alto (Q20102821): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item was added by a blocked bot. It is unnecessary item because not every coat of arms has a wikidata item. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep But every should have. Matlin (talk) 10:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105616917Edit

Hashim Azmi (Q105616917): Indian film director: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Previously deleted मार्तंड मल्हार (talk) 06:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep many external id's Matlin (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105426831 (2)Edit

Ramy Khodeir (Q105426831): American musician and actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability requirements. --71.66.179.134 17:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

As in the cancellation request above, I vote for keep.   Keep There are also statements about why the object should be kept from my point of view. PS: I changed the heading a little so that the two deletion requests for this object can be differentiated from one another. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Q81906990Edit

Shlemov (Q81906990): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

My mistake. Need to merge with Q105631345. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Vasyatka1 We can merge them indeed. Is there any reason to keep the new item, not the old one? whym (talk) 14:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
New item has more details. Old one can be deleted. The only page that used to be linked to old item is already re-linked to new item. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 14:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Okay, but I believe you should just convert one into a redirect (using the merge gadget), instead of deleting it. whym (talk) 14:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105636245Edit

Prophecy Onasis (Q105636245): Entrepreneur and musican: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional Rockpeterson (talk) 07:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

  Comment Has a link to Wikipedia. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete even the articles on him, are paid ads.

Q99658738Edit

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Sajith Thomas (Q99658738): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only linked to cats for a problematic "user" E4024 (talk) 14:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Previously deleted Rockpeterson (talk) 14:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105574994Edit

Lucie Gobillot-Costabel (Q105574994): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105673206Edit

Q105673206: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not found منع الواقع (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105673079Edit

Zakhvatayev (Q105673079): male family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, no sources منع الواقع (talk) 13:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  • An item for family name can't be created for spam purpose. --Wolverène (talk) 05:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep: Proper item, is used in Nikanor Zakhvatayev (Q4188886) and has a sitelink. Sun8908 💬 08:56, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105674844Edit

Q105674844: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Already exits : traversée cyclable (Q2125616) TCY (talk) 14:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  Comment @TCY: Why not merge it instead? --Fralambert (talk) 14:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105641940Edit

Folu Wright (Q105641940): American singer and songwriter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this person notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep because he passes Wikidata:Notability maybe? clearly an entity that is described by multiple sources (MusicBrainz artist ID, Genius artist ID etc). --Hannes Röst (talk) 15:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Q100250324Edit

Werley Nortreus (Q100250324): Singer, songwriter, author, drummer and politician from Haiti: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Xwiki vanity hoax spam Praxidicae (talk) 17:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q99001082Edit

Jahrein (Q99001082): male given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I do not know if such a "name" exists in any language, but I suspect this entry was created because there is an (IMHO not notable) person who uses this as a pseudonym (internet nickname). E4024 (talk) 18:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Well it was used on Jahrein (Q97221653) before you removed it. --JuTa (talk) 20:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104440740Edit

Q104440740: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104441382Edit

Q104441382: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104764891Edit

The Rope (Q104764891): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q102151087Edit

Q102151087: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104816720Edit

Q104816720: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105410239Edit

Kurt Guggenbichler (Q105410239): journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  Keep clearly meets Wikidata notability requirements, certainly #2, possibly #3. Is a German journalist. I have added a VIAF ID and more valid statements could be added. --Smallison (talk) 15:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104776229Edit

Wiepkenhagen (Q104776229): German neighborhood: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q104776229Edit

Wiepkenhagen (Q104776229): German neighborhood: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q103783631Edit

Q103783631: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q103783647Edit

Querdenken (Q103783647): COVID-19 German conspiracy theory: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105224416Edit

List of stumbling stones in Greiz (Q105224416): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep still available via url, an excellent resource, I am not sure why some were moved from de.wikipedia space to user space, and some are still list articles. If we take away the Wikidata link, I will never find them again. --RAN (talk) 14:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105063958Edit

List of stumbling stones in Reichenbach im Vogtland (Q105063958): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep still available via url. --RAN (talk) 14:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105047362Edit

List of stumbling stones in Zschopau (Q105047362): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep temporarily moved while completed, available via url.

Q103514891Edit

Esther Cohen (Q103514891): Greek Holocaust victim: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no working indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  Keep passes Wikidata notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." eg Oldest Greek Holocaust survivor Esther Cohen dies at 96 Piecesofuk (talk) 06:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  Keep as per rationale provided by User:Piecesofuk

Q105233876Edit

List of stumbling stones in Woltersdorf (Q105233876): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep the article has been moved until completed, can still link via url

Q105684533Edit

payer (Q105684533): one who pays (e.g. for a service): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It could be used only as a property. Property creation request: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/payer --VictorPorton (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105685680Edit

J Warner (Q105685680): Singer songwriter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Minorax (talk) 07:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep looks notable to me, see WD:N clearly there are reliable external sources. --Hannes Röst (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105097156Edit

Azad Rahi (Q105097156): Bangladeshi Singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Minorax (talk) 07:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105102358Edit

Aron World (Q105102358): Singer-Songwriter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Minorax (talk) 07:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105084405Edit

Millenium Management SRL (Q105084405): Romanian Business Catalog Company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105084497Edit

Lluïsa de Batlle Molar (Q105084497): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q12794040Edit

Q12794040: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. It also does not meet Wikidata's notability policy. --BSRF 💬 19:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105627459Edit

Iraq Typography (Q105627459): Artwork by Muntadher Saleh: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems like conflict of interest editing; wikidata:notability?  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105076759Edit

The Immortal martyr (Q105076759): Artwork by Muntadher Saleh: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No evidence of wikidata:notability; seems more like vanity editing  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105023418Edit

Muntadher (Q105023418): Iraqi Writer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No evidence of wikidata:notability; suspicious editing pattern more akin to vanity editing  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Q94995282Edit

Toys (Q94995282): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Stub with no information, no content, no Explantation --GodeNehler (talk) 06:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Q105710083Edit

Suitable for all ages (Q105710083): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a real content descriptor in the RCQ system. Máté (talk) 13:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

@AndréLegault: Nope, if there is no descriptor, use novalue like we always do. Máté (talk) 18:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
@Máté: Right. Thanks.--AndréLegault (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Q102869844Edit

Eric Hanson (Q102869844): Film & TV Actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Baby come (talk) 18:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Q102856325Edit

Amber Martinez (Q102856325): American actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertising Baby come (talk) 18:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't see it as advertising. In my opinion, she is relevant to Wikidata. A link to her IMDb ID (P345) (nm3276688) is missing in the data object. You can see on IMDb that she has appeared in many films. That's why I vote for:   Keep --Gymnicus (talk) 12:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q44956228Edit

Q44956228: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No useable information --RAN (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105474992Edit

alishkey (Q105474992): composer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only sources seem to be self-published, says all albums were published on soundcloud (with two tracks nearly empty), I'm afraid seems not too notable --CamelCaseNick (talk) 03:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105720206Edit

syed sameer munna (Q105720206): Syed Sameer Munna is an Indian artist and photographer known for his work on fashion, concerts, and personal portfolios. Most of his life works revolve around the themes of low light and fashion photography.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable —Belwine (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105682531Edit

Future Salaries (dApp) (Q105682531): a crypto app for paying "salaries" to common good producers: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional content Haansn08 (talk) 10:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q55096937Edit

Q55096937: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q55096935Edit

Q55096935: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q55120986Edit

Q55120986: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q55120979Edit

Q55120979: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q55096943Edit

Q55096943: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q55096944Edit

Q55096944: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q54992571Edit

Q54992571: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q54992573Edit

Q54992573: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q54992576Edit

Q54992576: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q54992572Edit

Q54992572: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 13:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q54992581Edit

Q54992581: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 14:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q54992577Edit

Q54992577: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 14:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q54992574Edit

Q54992574: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

We don't need item for wikisource page ns Skim (talk) 14:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (Q3538879)Edit

TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE PARIS (Q3538879): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Please may I kindly request your help to transfer the following page on Paris Tribunal (Q2974817). These are the same topic. Thanks a lot in advance for your help. --82.124.184.144 14:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
People make a confusion between the judicial company, the "Tribunal de grande instance de Paris", and the building itself. Paris Tribunal (Q2974817) is the new building of the "Tribunal de grande instance de Paris". Both are the same. --2A01:CB00:B51:3E00:C11F:63EE:5714:E00B 14:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q59542487Edit

Wikimedia set category (Q59542487): use with 'instance of' (P31) for wiki categories that define a set of articles defined by a set of common types and properties. (e.g. 'Planetary scientists' (Q8764963), 'Films set in the 1660s' (Q25308979), etc.): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Seems we missed this one when doing the other at Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/11/25#Q59541917 --- Jura 17:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105724710Edit

Paige Fox (Q105724710): Character of Foxtrot: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per notability policy Jan Myšák (talk) 19:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

{Keep}} notability due to structural need. --Smallison (talk) 02:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105711969Edit

Q105711969: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I created this page before I remarked that for this person (Athénaïs Clément from Romont, FR, Switzerland) there is yet a page (Q78060521 } / Ich kreierte diese Seite (Q105711969) irrtümlicherweise. Danach stellte ich fest, dass es für Athénaïs Clément (aus Romont, FR, Schweiz) bereits eine Seite (Q78060521) gibt. --Matutinho 19:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q96698189Edit

emma (Q96698189): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Based on Crossref data where author is "Crossref Test"; likely to be test item in the database and not an entry for a real journal. Peter James (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Q56504732Edit

Theodora Ferreri (Q56504732): Latvian pornographic actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Wolverène (talk) 08:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep Yes, notable, because regardless it refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references. per Wikidata:Notability Criterion 2. -Animalparty (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    1) None of those identifiers imply notability. 2) With such a liberal interpretation of WD:N we're literally wasting time here, 99% of people-related items have identifiers. 3) Just some student girl from the Eastern Europe who visited Woodman because of a little money, she can't be notable just because she had 'given name+last name' -templated pseudonym. She left no significant trace in the X industry. --Wolverène (talk) 06:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q55755669Edit

Jadi Mirmirani (Q55755669): Iranian Programmer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability 5.209.172.162 --5.209.172.162 10:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Notable since there's the WM Commons link. In fact the problem is that the item is empty. --Wolverène (talk) 10:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
The creator is @Hanooz:. --Wolverène (talk) 10:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Q104822142Edit

Zeyan Jeelani Shafiq (Q104822142): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item is no more on wikipedia because of not qualifying for Wikipedia notability criteria --TheRedReaper (talk) 02:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q65768918Edit

Gunning jr. (Q65768918): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Probably not a valid family name, merely an error conflated with Gunning (Q29653177) (but any members of the Gunning jr. family, please speak up). -Animalparty (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q101251814Edit

Vedant Birla (Q101251814): Indian businessman: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional or paid item. 14.139.56.108 06:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105747065Edit

Gary Fullett (Q105747065): American trader: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Rockpeterson (talk) 07:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105752829Edit

Q105752829: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Author request. wrong namespace Vis M (talk) 07:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

The Wróblewski familyEdit

Q16830191Edit

The existance of the item may be justified just by the Commons category, but that one contains only one photo so has no special benefit even there (alas, this doesn't depend on us). --Wolverène (talk) 07:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

The data object for Natalia Wróblewska (Q16830191) must be preserved in any case.   Keep The reason for this is very simple because it meets the second point of the relevance criteria. The data object has several IDs and below this is the property ISNI (P213). More relevance is not possible.
I am not sure if NUKAT and PLWABN entries imply notability, but another ones almost certainly don't, including ISNI (anyone can create ISNI entry for themselves if knows how algorithms work). --Wolverène (talk) 05:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Q54624271Edit

A child of Natalia and Mariusz. Just the mentioning of the number of children might be enough. --Wolverène (talk) 07:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

  Delete I can only agree to this request for cancellation. Even if the data object logically has links from the data object Natalia Wróblewska (Q16830191), Mariusz Wróblewski (Q54577616) and Q55224876, there is no argument here why Q54624271 creates the relevance hurdle. --Gymnicus (talk) 13:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
@Wolverène: Sould we also delete Q55224876? He his even younger that Q54624271. --Fralambert (talk) 14:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok. I found that the item have a another RfD. --Fralambert (talk) 15:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

{{done}} already deleted, to let the bot archive --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The bot archives the whole topic then... I'm still not sure if another items mentioned here are notable, at least they weren't actually kept. --Wolverène (talk) 10:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q23927600Edit

The thesis written by N. Wróblewska. Everybody who graduated from a university used to write something like this. This doesn't look like scientific article, conference message, or what else we are considering notable. --Wolverène (talk) 07:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep clearly this fulfills Wikidata:Notability number 2 "a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". Doctoral theses are often held at national libraries are used as sources in scientific articles or research. --Hannes Röst (talk) 15:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
    Held if the doctoral advisor and the other commission (committee?) members approve it as source of fundamentally new scientific research. In other cases, e.g. in my land the theses are normally holding for 5 years in a university archive and after that they are getting destroyed. I don't think the situation is totally different in Poland and most of other countries. I remember my graduate theses (both barchelor's and master's like here) and the way they were written (nailed-up roughly in a month before the defending), so I would've been surprised if they were ever points of interest for the science. --Wolverène (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q102317117Edit

The thesis written by M. Wróblewski. Same problem with the one above, these individuals may be best in what they are writing about, but they aren't world-class scientists to let their theses be 'immortalized' at WD. --Wolverène (talk) 07:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Keep clearly this fulfills Wikidata:Notability number 2 "a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". Doctoral theses are often held at national libraries are used as sources in scientific articles or research. --Hannes Röst (talk) 15:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
    See above. --Wolverène (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

For allEdit

An enterprising family confused Wikidata with Facebook. The item for one of the younger members nominated somewhere above already. The item for Mariusz Wróblewski isn't nominated for deletion since he's an author of some book of 51 pages, so that item meets WD:N criterion #3. --Wolverène (talk) 07:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Q100230463Edit

Travis Guterman (Q100230463): Entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable for wikidata. --103.114.98.11 12:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q9334201Edit

Q9334201: Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant, the only item is pl-wiki redirect page Pibwl (talk) 12:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105755682Edit

OUP accepted manuscript (Q105755682): scientific article published on 27 January 2021: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The DOI on which this item is based still points to a preprocessed editin and is not yet a persistant identifier. I propose to delete this item now, until the DOI is persistent Andrawaag (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105753922Edit

Boost Gaming UK (Q105753922): BoostGaming.com - The place to get your digital power-ups, wallet top-up, subscription and game downloads from the biggest brands in gaming... In seconds.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Rockpeterson (talk) 17:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105753457Edit

Richard Barman (Q105753457): Indian Photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Previously deleted Rockpeterson (talk) 17:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q105336871Edit

Q105336871: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don't see any sense behind this object for which there is no source. --2003:DA:1709:D9D9:6871:2CCB:C6B:DA24 18:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Q96085049Edit

Jane Austen (Q96085049): born 1655: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is not THE Jane Austen, but rather another Jane Austen whose only claim to notability is being the great-grandmother of a barely notable British MP from the 1700s. The item provides no benefit to anyone and doesn't meet any of the criteria at Wikidata:Notability. Kaldari (talk) 22:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)