Requests for deletions

Items which do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata ^connect.

Before deleting items, check to ensure that they are not in use. This can be easily done with the "links" link below the header of each request.

Do not try to pre-emptively delete an item because its page is up for deletion on a Wikimedia project. The link will be removed by bots and reported here in the future if a deletion takes place.

Please use {{Q}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if 1) the user is still active on Wikidata and 2) the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead. If help is needed with the merging of items, see the instructions at Help:Merge.

Add a new request

Translate this header box!

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at October 19.

Project chat	Lexicographical data	Administrators' noticeboard	Development team	Translators' noticeboard
Request a query	Requests for deletions	Requests for comment	Bot requests	Requests for permissions
Property proposal	Properties for deletion	Partnerships and imports	Interwiki conflicts	Bureaucrats' noticeboard

Requests for deletions

high

_{104 open requests for deletions.}

Pages tagged with `{{Delete}}`Edit

Wikidata talk:Main Pag

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.

RequestsEdit

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.

~410 Azerbaijani filmsEdit

(Those items are listed at User:Pasleim/Items for deletion/Page deleted/Archive/2017-2.)
There are ~410 items about Azerbaijani films whose only sitelinks were deleted by azwiki admin User:Vusal1981 in October/November 2017. There are no identifiers, links, or references on the items, and they have barely been touched in the past 14 months by editors (as it happens to most abandoned items). As I have no idea where I can lookup information about them, I’d like to ask the community whether anyone can rescue these items so that they meet the notability requirements, or whether they shall be deleted as non-notable items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 08:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

We used to have more of them. I don't think they were based on an online resource. I vaguely recall discussing them with a contributor to that wiki. I don't recall who that was though. Obviously, it would be good to keep them, but that would need a reference to confirm them. --- Jura 08:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Found it: User_talk:Sotiale/Archive_A#azwiki. --- Jura 09:10, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
@MisterSynergy: can we close this as withdrawn/not done? --- Jura 12:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Well, most of the items have not changed since I filed this request, and formally they do not meet the notability requirements. I would rather see them being deleted, as we don't have an idea what this really is about… —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  - @MisterSynergy: I think they could be referenced: as such they do. --- Jura 12:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  - @MisterSynergy: The usual refer for these is probably [1] --- Jura 10:36, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Q15348443Edit

Solenostoma paroicum (Q60617107): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Allready exists; see Q15348443 --Llywelyn2000 (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

@Llywelyn2000: For me it isn't clear that Solenostoma paroicum (Q60617107) and Jungermannia paroica (Q15348443) are identical. Can you elaborate? --Pasleim (talk) 09:12, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

As I understand, Solenostoma paroicum/shining flapwort is synonymic to Jungermannia paroica. --Wolverène (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Added the statement "Said to be the same as": [2], [3]. What do you think? --Wolverène (talk) 08:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Notified participants of WikiProject Taxonomy: can you provide some expertise, please …? Thanks, MisterSynergy (talk) 12:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

These are two different names, that is, two different formal entities. If there was more information a "taxon synonym" / "is a synonym of ..." statement could be added, but this information is not present. We really do need a "this name is homotypic with" property. - Brya (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

I am not an expert in Bryophytes, but the two taxa do have the same basionym: Nardia paroica Schiffn. Lotos 58: 320. 1910. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC), 22:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC).

Yes, that is what I said: they are homotypic. - Brya (talk) 12:25, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes. Also – for what it's worth – ITIS lists Solenostoma paroicum (Schiffn.) Schust. as a synonym of Jungermannia fossombronioides Aust. (Q17290457), but doesn't list Jungermannia paroica at all. Then again I guess ITIS is fairly often not very well updated these days. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 12:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC).

Yes. And Tropicos says that Jungermannia fossombronioides is treated as a synonym of Solenostoma fossombronioides by Stotler, R. E. & B. J. Crandall-Stotler. 2017. A synopsis of the liverwort flora of North America north of Mexico. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 102(4): 574–709. A synopsis of the liverwort flora of North America north of Mexico. Information on bryophytes is fairly scarce. - Brya (talk) 17:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Q40985505Edit

Cebus sp. (Q40985505): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Ambiguous, not a valid taxon, and unlinked. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 08:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

@Tommy Kronkvist: it has a valid identifier, thus I tend to keep it. If some of the statements are not correct, please use deprecated rank to remove this item from query results. Is that possible? --MisterSynergy (talk) 06:44, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy: Perhaps, but I don't think so. As far as I understand it, the NCBI Taxonomy identifier regards a species of virus named Cebine betaherpesvirus 1 (Q24808723). It has been found in two host species: humans, and in an unspecified specimen belonging to the Gracile capuchin monkey genus Cebus (Q8447051). The Virus-Host DB page can be found here: https://www.genome.jp/virushostdb/1125844 I'm only guessing here, but it seems the scientists studying this particular strain of virus didn't bother to identify which of the fifteen or so species of the Cebus genus that particular monkey belonged to. The reason for this is of course that they were not really studying the monkey at all, but the virus using it as host.

Normally within the field of taxonomy the term "species" or the abbreviation "sp." is only used when failing to pinpoint a particular species within a recognized genus. More or less, "sp." is only a placeholder for a taxon name until the specimen has been properly identified as being a member of a valid species, or described as a new species. In this case however, no one ever tried to do this. In fact, instead of (sort of...) specifying the object as "Cebus sp." they might just as well simply have called it "monkey". In this particular case "Cebus sp." doesn't really relate to any specific taxon at all – hence, it can never be a "deprecated" taxon either.

Lastly, perhaps @Pigsonthewing have an opinion about all this? He's familiar with most things about taxonomy, and on top of that also knows more about the Wikidata tech details than me. Best regards, Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 10:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC).

Thanks for asking. I have no definitve answer. On the one hand, MisterSynergy is correct in regard the identifier making it notable. On the other, if it is valid, why not the same for every other (non-monotypic) genus? Perhaps we should keep it, but with a different value for P31? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes, "keep it, but with a different value for P31" is what I had in mind; I am just not qualified to select another value item :-)
The item was created by User:Magnus Manske, apparently as an import from Taxonomy database of the U.S. National Center for Biotechnology Information (Q13711410). If we kept the item, we would avoid that someone would re-create a new item for that database entry in the future. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Q55687191Edit

clarification (Q55687191): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Referent unclear Swpb (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

See the Polish description. Delete because it's unused and because Wikidata is not a terminology dictionary. --Wolverène (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Avaiable in Ross Brawn and Adam Parr Total Competition: Lessons in strategy from Formula One. Simply saying it's process in Formula One. Should be keeped same as Q10747721. Eurohunter (talk) 16:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  - With lack of references in statements it's still not notable. --Wolverène (talk) 21:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  - @Eurohunter: can we merge into homologation (Q10747721), so that "klaryfikacja" remains as alias for that item? The term might occur in the source you provide, but it seems rarely used otherwise, right? --MisterSynergy (talk) 06:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  - @Eurohunter: Re-ping, your input will be helpful to MisterSynergy's response above. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
    - @MisterSynergy: @1997kB: It seems to be different, more detailed thing. Eurohunter (talk) 20:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Q61446814Edit

Q61446814: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It seems to be this series has no seasons: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seznam_d%C3%ADlů_seriálu_Děrevnja_durakov Queryzo (talk) 06:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Derevnya durakov (The Fool's Village) was a part of sketch TV show en:Calambur. Calambur had 6 seasons. I'm not sure if Derevnya durakov divided by seasons itself. Anyway, it's not our problem for now, request the deletion of the Czech article in their project first. --Wolverène (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

BTW there's reason to move cs:Děrevnja durakov into the separate item, because it doesn't describe the whole show.--Wolverène (talk) 09:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

... so you did it wrong. --Wolverène (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Queryzo: looking above your move seem to be controversial, could you please explain? ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
you can feel free to revert my edits, I'm not familiar with this series and may did wrong with requesting a deletion. Queryzo (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Q22284875Edit

Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Incomplete and erroneous duplicate of Q567079 --Iulle (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

It look like Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q567079) is about all the station including Fernbahnhof and S-bahn rail. and Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) is only about s-bahn. but I don't know if it is right or not. - yona b (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

That's correct. That's why Q22284875 has a Property:P361 pointing to Q567079. One cannot merge these items without removing that property first. - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 06:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

I started to clean up the three items. But it is a bit difficult Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q567079) Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) Jungfernheide metro station (Q19951075) --GPSLeo (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

There have been some changes in the items recently. @Srittau, MB-one, GodeNehler, GPSLeo: can you please have a look, particularly at the item histories [4][5][6]? I have no idea how we usually model railway stations. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

The content of Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) should definitely not get removed until the deletion request is decided. But we have to decide if a station with a part for the S-Bahn (Q95723) and a part for the regular railway should have two separate items or not. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

I would propose to stay only with item Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q567079) and to remove item Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) as the Berlin S-Bahn (Q99654) of Berlin has only combined items with S-Bahn and Train. There are only separate item for Berlin U-Bahn (Q68646), see also item Berlin Alexanderplatz station (Q698497), Berlin-Friedrichstraße railway station (Q702402) or Berlin Hauptbahnhof (Q1097). --GodeNehler (talk) 08:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

I don't know if this is the case here, but S-Bahn stations are quite often treated as separate stations from the main line stations, they share the name with, if they don't share any track infrastructure (which is the case here). So, I guess, we should keep separate items for all three stations (main line (Q3238851), S-Bahn (Q95723) and rapid transit (Q5503)). --MB-one (talk) 09:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

The items seems to be confused at the moment. In reality the station has 2 S-Bahn tracks, 2 U-Bahn tracks, 2 regular train tracks and at least 2 metro bus stops(I'm not sure from memory whether it's 2 or 4 metro stops). The S-Bahn part and the train part is owned DB Netz (Q896765) but neither buses nor U-Bahn is. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Q741032Edit

Trigger point (Q741032): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It should be merged with myofascial trigger point (Q1956673) as they refer to the same concept. --Nasch92 (talk) 11:31, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

They both have a zh.wp link, can someone native check if that is true they are the same? Q.Zanden questions? 23:37, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

@Lakokat: Please take a look. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Bencemac, I suggest to ping editors of both zhwiki articles instead: @Kasuga, Waihorace, Winstonlighter, Wolfch, Kolyma:@Tigerzeng: plus bot operators of bots that edited: @Luckas Blade, Toto Azéro, Addshore, 和平奮鬥救地球, Emaus:, if they agree merging of articles, them let them, but if not, them both should keep normally. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Q20984678Edit

eater (Q20984678): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

@Thierry Caro, Sjoerddebruin: I don't think that "eater" is really an occupation, or that pointing to this item with subclass of (P279) or occupation (P106) is the proper way to model that something eats something else. I don't think this item serves any real purpose. Yair rand (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Keep. It's OK. Thierry Caro (talk) 04:48, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Comment @Yair rand: if this is not the proper way, how would you suggest to do it? In particular, I'm thinking about competitive eaters like Molly Schuyler (Q6896676) who do have for principal - and sometimes professional - occupation to be an eater. Until then I would lean towards

Keep. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: One's occupation can be participating in eating competitions, but one's occupation can't be "being an entity that eats". (I see that User:Thierry Caro has created competitive eater (Q63554580) for the actual occupation, which is more accurate.) man-eater (Q1365331) and Cookie Monster (Q1754267) are not modeled in a way that makes sense, though. We have main food source (P1034), though I'm not sure that would work here. --Yair rand (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Q57904781Edit

Pascale Canova (Q57904781): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Demande de la personne objet de la notice Alain Schneider (talk) 08:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

no more links Alain Schneider (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

It is highly irregular for your to remove links, and data, while the item's deletion is being discussed; doubly so as you have declared an apparent conflict of interest. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Keep "Request of the person who is the subject of the notice" is not a valid reason for deletion; and is in any case stated without evidence. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment @Alain Schneider: pourrais-tu donner des détails ? d'où viens la demande de suppression, directement de la concernée ? est-ce publique ? sur quoi cette demande est-elle basée ? etc. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:33, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @VIGNERON: Cette personne est une collègue de travail qui ne voit pas en quoi des éléments personnels ont à être mis dans une base de données publique. Elle considère que c'est contraire au RGPD et veut s'adresser à la CNIL. J'ai d'ailleurs quasiment vidé (avant que tu ne les remettes) la notice de toute information et enlevé tous les liens Alain Schneider (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
  - Indeed, after carefull checking most of these data are not public so I would lean towards Delete at the very least and in any case, the history should be purge by an admin. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Delete As I understand it the item contains sensitive information that was unfortunately put in. Either the history should be hidden or the item should be entirely deleted. I think the delete option would be best. It is better to be on the safe side concerning sensitive information. Hiding the history may also draw unfortunate Streissand effect attention to the item in question. The item can be created as a new item (with less information) or not based on whether this is appropriate. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- There is a difference between revision-deleting inappropriate claims and deleting a valid item that meets our noatability crteria. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

I can do the appropriate revdels if someone can email me what revision numbers specifically to revdel and whether the summaries and the contributor names of those revisions should also be hidden. @Fnielsen, VIGNERON, Alain Schneider, Pigsonthewing: Mahir256 (talk) 04:43, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Cleopatra (disambiguation)Edit

Q60374066: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It should be merged into Q20799297 but automatic merge fails. Maybe the same with: Q60371864(French) Q60372192(Greek) Q60372373(Cyrillic) Q60372801(Persian) Q60372959(Hebrew) Q60373103(Belarusian) Q60373294(Armenian) Q60373492(Japanese) Q60373639(Georgian) Q60373849(Chinese) --Puzzlet Chung (talk) 03:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

They can't be merged now because they're interlinked with Property:P460. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 07:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

In January @Moebeus: add Property:P460 to all the item and didn't merge them. maybe he can help us to understand why not merge them. - yona b (talk) 07:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

@יונה בנדלאק: Hi there! It is the practise of Wikidata:WikiProject_Names that each spelling variant gets its own item, even if all that separates them is just an accent. Since each name should be linked to a corresponding disambiguation page, it's cleaner if those follow the same "rule". Rather than merging, the different spellings are instead linked through Property:P460. This has the added bonus of allowing more than one disambiguation page per language, of which there are quite a few. Anyways, that was the rationale, if you guys feel strongly about it I won't protest, but it would be helpful if a differing practise is anchored in some sort of written guidelines and cleared with Wikidata:WikiProject_Names. Moebeus (talk)

Q31274785Edit

Q31274785: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There exists Q19597898 Estopedist1 (talk) 18:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Technically two different names, Q31274785 is a variant for the people who living in Estonia or Finland with the official Latin script, Q19597898 is for citizens of countries with the Cyrillic script as official. I'm not sure there's need on merging even if the names in fact direct equivalents of each other. --Wolverène (talk) 22:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Q18974314Edit

COX3 (Q18974314): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Obsolete Magnus Manske (talk) 10:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:50, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

@Magnus Manske: There seem to be a lot of GeneDB ID's for this item. Why do you think they are wrong? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:15, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Q61873305Edit

Pf_M76611 (Q61873305): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Obsolete, unused Magnus Manske (talk) 10:51, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Can't delete, excesively used in COX3 (Q18974314). --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Q31441239Edit

Maria Angeles Guanzon Lapeña (Q31441239): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet Wikidata:Notability since it represents a page in the "Draft:" namespace. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Leaning Keep, even without the wikilink this person seems notable enough for WD. That said, the draft link should probably be removed (especially as this is a draft for a long time). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Q31797707Edit

Q31797707: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

"Poes d' Trouk" is "Zea mays", than to be linked with Q11575 Lucyin (talk) 21:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Lucyin, pls comment the appearance of wa:Dinrêye d' awousse, was it correctly linked with Q11575? is it a synonym of "poes d' Trouk" resp. permanently duplicated page?.. We can't merge Q31797707 into Q11575 as it's obviously impossible to keep two Walloon pages at the same time in one item. --Wolverène (talk) 14:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
"dinrêye d' awousse" means "august cereal", right? then you'd better replace this page to a new item (unless it has some special meaning in the language). Regards, --Wolverène (talk) 14:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Q31797707 is a duplicate of Q11575; is "Dinrêye d' awousse" the same as cereal (Q12117) or something more specific? Also is Q25634296 the same as blight (Q4273292) or only one of the items listed at fr:Rouille (maladie)#Liste des maladies appelées « rouilles » en français? Peter James (talk) 18:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Q22808320Edit

I think this should be replaced with Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410). Its presence just complicates checking for dab pages. Notified participants of WikiProject Names --- Jura 12:53, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Delete I agree. --Mormegil (talk) 10:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Q28065731Edit

Not sure what it adds. Complicates check for disambiguation. Use Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) instead --- Jura 18:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Support; It is in use in ~900 items as value of instance of (P31), most of them with qualifiers of (P642) that link to the "main" item. I suggest to use Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) as value for instance of (P31), and add a permanent duplicated item (P2959) statement that links to the main item. Also: @Pasleim: who has created this item. --MisterSynergy (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Q64639286Edit

baseline water stress (Q64639286): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks definition MisterSynergy (talk) 05:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy:, I don't understand, are you saying you can't see the description? It has the description 'the ratio of total water withdrawals relative to the annual available renewable surface water supplies' --John Cummings (talk) 08:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Q62239558Edit

boat clasp (Q62239558): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks definition MisterSynergy (talk) 05:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy:, there is a description in French.

Q56109259Edit

many sports (Q56109259): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This looks like a lazy attempt to avoid listing all sports of multi-sport events (such as the Olympics) with sport (P641). Per this query, there are some 100 uses to be replaced before this item can be deleted. MisterSynergy (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

If relevant, please see some consensus discussion at Project Sports. Jagulin (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Q63968208Edit

Kovářová (Q63968208): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No need for this item, only included redirects; this is a feminine version of the name Kovář, no need for it in Wikidata ontology Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Comment actually we have gender inflection of surname (P5278) --- Jura 04:34, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: empty items by User:TdombosEdit

All items were created by User:Tdombos in January, but they are still empty. I deleted them back then, and restored them after a complaint in Topic:Ut0yiyhv614sxjj0; months later they are still empty and unused, so I guess this is abandoned content. MisterSynergy (talk) 06:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Ooops, sorry about that, forgot about them. Will quickly do it now. Tdombos (talk) 16:39, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy: Have these items been improved to your satisfaction? Mahir256 (talk) 18:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Not really, but if User:Tdombos wants to work on them a little more, I have no problems to keep this section open for a while. Some items are still completely empty; some others meanwhile have some basic statements, but still do not comply with the notability policy. IIRC Tdombos wanted to bring them to actual use as well in other items, which would be interesting to have a look at as well. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:14, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Q65939978Edit

Monica Montero Lomeli (Q65939978): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 04:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Look how many references there are. --Wolverène (talk) 09:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- Did you review them or just count them? Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 09:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Q4956264Edit

Brampton Walk of Fame (Q4956264): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is an inaccurate mix of Q66023179 and Q66023163. --Zanimum (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

On hold - The article is en:Brampton Arts Walk of Fame, so this should be fixed on the enwiki. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 15:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Q60038053Edit

serving (Q60038053): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by User:NMaia for a property proposal which was meanwhile closed by User:ZI Jony as "not done". Do we still need this item?

Relevant discussion: Topic:Uv15fcpue20rd58p
Property proposal: Wikidata:Property proposal/yield

--MisterSynergy (talk) 10:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Keep even if we’re agreed that product or material produced (P1056) should be used for recipes, we still need “serving” as a unit in cooking. - PKM (talk) 18:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Q63648354Edit

Category:Mississippi Queen (ship, 1987) (Q63648354): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by User:Clemens Stockner for the still-existing Commons category commons:Category:Mississippi Queen (ship, 1987). However, User:Ein Dahmer insists on User talk:Ein Dahmer#Mississippi Queen that this category sitelink should not be linked to the item as there is already commons:Category:ENI 02317978 for the same vessel, linked to Mississippi Queen (Q63676401). How are these cases handled? Also pinging some experienced Wikidata+Commons editors: @Mike Peel, Jarekt, Jheald: thanks for any input. --MisterSynergy (talk) 10:42, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66084620Edit

M. R. X. Dentith (Q66084620): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promo --大诺史 (talk) 13:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

I think we should Keep. He has identifiers. We definitely need to clean it up. And I am not sure why his book is listed twice (once as 1st edition). But the item itself is passes IMO. Quakewoody (talk) 14:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Q6799778Edit

Mbsf (Q6799778): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The English Wikipedia article (the only sitelink) has been redirected (final revision of article). I would replace this with a lexeme containing the equivalent information. Jc86035 (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Do you think this might be useful as a unit when adding measurements as statements or qualifiers? Mahir256 (talk) 04:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q20738855Edit

urban area with a population of 150-199 (Q20738855): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

While this item currently satisfies the structural notability criterion, it seems to be only used on a couple of items as a instance of (P31) value, which might not be appropriate. (The item has no sitelinks and is described as an "inofficial [sic] concept".) Unless the relevant census data is not detailed enough to add the exact values through population (P1082), it should be possible to replace all the uses of this item. Jc86035 (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Q58021361Edit

Zack Evans (Q58021361): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable individual, possible spam --159.33.10.155 23:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

If I remember correctly, the creator of the item uses IMDb cast lists to link/create Wikidata items. It may or may not meet notability, but it isn't (1st generation) spam. Is it spam on IMDb that then got innocently repeated here - possibly. But the item creator is not the spammer. To get rid of this item, you would literally need to look into each item that is linked to it, and each item that links to that... so on and so forth. Quakewoody (talk) 14:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Q55594712Edit

Q55594712: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is not the phonedirectory Bahnmoeller (talk) 19:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Keep A Stolperstein in Ulm Stolperstein dedicated to Heinrich Barth (Q55579500) is dedicated to Q55594712. More information on the Projectsite. Looniverse (talk) 13:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Q23308924Edit

IEEE official website (Q23308924): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item is the "official website" of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (Q131566). Is there a reason that a website, this one in particular, should be its own item? Senator2029 (talk) 01:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

It’s a clearly identifiable entity. I used it in a source statement to state in which website a url that sourced something pointed to (Q23308923#P279. Meets the notabitily policy then, it does not requires any further reason. author TomT0m / talk page 07:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Keep @Senator2029: it's strange but unusual (we have more than 9318 items about website right now) and it's used as a source which is a reason enough to keep. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Comment – This item is for the organization's homepage which is not useful as a reference URL either on Wikidata or Wikipedia, as those should be specific unique links. Senator2029 (talk) 06:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

It’s not used as a reference url, so I don’t understand the point. It’s used to explicit the publication location, exactly as for a scientific article we also state the scientific journal in which it is published, even if their is a link to the full article content available online. author TomT0m / talk page 16:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q47159728Edit

Trillium Ensemble (Q47159728): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear notability. No sitelinks. Technically, the item is notable due to the structural criterion, but only because of the existence of Silent Spring Project (Q47010732), which represents one of the group's albums. As a whole, the musical group and their works would likely fail WD:N if they were not linked to each other. Jc86035 (talk) 13:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66305811Edit

Ludvík Váša (Q66305811): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Bad source, real name is Ludvík Vašica Skim (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Skim: could you not just correct the name and source? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: I created this record from Historie učitelských ústavů na Moravě a jejich význam pro současnost (Q66305797), but this bachelor thesis isn't right. I found Zpráva c.k. ústavu ku vzdělání učitelů v Příboře za léta 1875–1899 (Q66305950), where is precise list of directors of school. Second director hasn't this name, but Ludvík Vašica Ludvík Vašica (Q66306493). Source is on many places in this report.

So i can merge this two records, but this one is false, i decided that deleting is better. Skim (talk) 15:45, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Oh, ok, thanks for the precisions. I would still merge and correct (which is the usual way), I let others give their point of view. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Q306966Edit

Eastern equine encephalitis virus (Q306966): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I tried to add french language ref. (Virus de l'encéphalite équine de l'Est) to the English page, got a save failure --Dasilvj (talk) 13:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

fr:Virus de l'encéphalite équine de l'Est is linked o this item, the english one is in Q18553951. The english article , though, is en:Eastern equine encephalitis, but Q306966 should contain Eastern equine encephalitis virus and merging cannot be done because there are two categories on Commons, one for the virus, and one for the other. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 14:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Better to have both objects anyway. --SCIdude (talk) 14:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Q1788171Edit

A.S. Siracusa Calcio 1924 (DEPRECATED) (Q1788171): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There are really a messed up heritage of a football club which multi legal persons claiming as successor. New item had replaced Q1788171 as Associazione Sportiva Siracusa (Q39052565), A.S.D. Città di Siracusa (Q4647072) and U.S. Siracusa (Q28195113). Fourth item to be created for yet another legally unrelated team A.S.D. Città di Siracusa for 2012-13 season. --Matthew hk (talk) 19:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66624482Edit

Q66624482: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item David (talk) 07:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

It had a description and location; I've added "instance of" and country. Items have been created for schools in the UK, so it looks like schools are accepted for notability, it just needs a reference or identifier. Peter James (talk) 14:07, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Q57076870Edit

Jim McCarthy (Q57076870): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No information except the name. There are links to this, but that raises another problem: The links are for at least 2, probably 3 different persons. --Andre Engels (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

@Magnus Manske: The item was created by your SourceMD tool. Can you explain how the tool reasoned that the three works are by the same author? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Q59278656Edit

Delphine Ménard (Q59278656): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs) This should be deleted because I am not notable and I find this encroaches on my privacy, I would be grateful if this was deleted. Thank you --notafish }<';> 15:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:00, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

@Slaporte, Liuxinyu970226, Robin van der Vliet: Can you explain why you believe that the kind of information you added about the referenced person should be on Wikidata? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Keep has a valid commonswiki link plus even enough number of statements. @Delphine (WMF): to let she explain more. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Comment @Liuxinyu970226: notafish is Delphine (WMF), so she already explained herself. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@VIGNERON, notafish: If that user really want this item to be deleted, before that we need to nominate c:Category:Delphine Ménard to be deleted. Because, under this criteria, that commons category also violates her privacy. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Acually, I don't think it does in the same way. I am identified in these pictures, but none of those pictures actually invite anyone to add my parents' names, my relatives' names, my date of birth, my nationality or anything that actually encroaches on my privacy. If anything, the commons category helps me actually to protect my privacy by allowing me to track pictures that could be derogatory, or mislabeled. I don't understand how having a category on commons actually makes me notable enough to become an item on Commons. This is a strange relationship between our two projects. Can someone explain to me the rationale before I ask to delete the category on Commons (which, again, I don't think makes me notable in any way) notafish }<';> 15:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

I think you should start at Commons to have the category removed, then this becomes empty and that with the lack of notability should suffice to have Q59278656 deleted. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 14:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

See my question above. Thanks! notafish }<';> 15:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

If you would not be notable, then why is there a need for a category in Commons? A category on Commons may trigger the automatic creation of a item like this, so deleting it while the Commonscat exist may not be a permanent solution. The additional information that encroaches on your privacy can be deleted by someone with sufficient permissions in a way that it cannot simply be reversed by someone of seen in the history of the item. If you cannot of don't want the commonscat deleted, I think that would be the best way to address your issue. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 12:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

@notafish:, I looked it up, I think you're best served with this page: Wikidata:Living people. There's a section on privacy violation there. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 13:07, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Delete I don't think WMF staff are notable by default nor should their details be stored by default in Wikidata. A sitelink to Commons isn't sufficient for notability either.
Easiest solution to get this deleted might be to ask HR for it. --- Jura 22:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@Jura1: Please in the next time, first nominate deletion locally (i.e. Commons:Deletion requests on Commons) first, then here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:12, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- No. I think you didn't read or understand my comment. @Liuxinyu970226: Do not add usernames to Wikidata when you know the user doesn't want it to be added. --- Jura 05:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Q28197678Edit

Q28197678: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Useless element Niridya (talk) 14:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

It's one of a series of items for categories containing pages of featured articles by month. Years up to 2015 have other links but recent years such as this only have French. Other Wikipedias have an equivalent page in the project namespace in Wikipedia:Today's featured article/2017 (Q26429386). They probably shouldn't be merged because of the different page types, but is there a way of linking Q26429386 and Q28197678? Peter James (talk) 18:08, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Q65688637Edit

Q65688637: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Article moved to older object. Deryni (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

The older object is symbiotic nova (Q167188). Z Andromedae variables (Q66522101) and Q65688637 are both "Z Andromedae variable", but the English Wikipedia has Q66522101 connected to a redirect to symbiotic binary (Q18393176). It looks like it's a subclass of Q18393176, but is it the same as Q167188 or just similar? Peter James (talk) 17:46, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Q28657052Edit

Q28657052: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It was an erroneous mix of Q29710111 and Q29709994 Ysogo (talk) 04:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

It looks like it's the same as Q29710111. An identifier was the same as Q29709994, but only because it had an 8 at the end where there should have been a 9. This should probably be merged as it has existed for more than 2 years and was created before Q29710111. Peter James (talk) 17:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66836070Edit

Bronwen Chisholm (Q66836070): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable. Fails WD:N. Hiàn (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Keep this author seems notable enough per WD:N (critera 2 and 3), @Hiàn: why would you think it's not notable? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

I have not yet seen enough reliable third-party sources to make the analysis that she would be notable. I fail to see how this is not simply another self-promotion attempt. Hiàn (talk) 14:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Q29001764Edit

Please give the item ID. --80.41.196.34 17:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC) https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q29001764 Delete page on behalf of subject

Stephen Mark Barchan (Q29001764): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Page doesn't currently link to anything and my reading of the notability policy of wikidata suggests that it doesn't seem to meet any other criteria. --Nosebagbear (talk) 17:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment unclear, there is two identifiers but it's a bit light for critera 2 of WD:N. For the records, there was an article on en.wp deleted on 2016, apparently asked by the subject himself, just like this RFD so given the unclear notability, I would lean toward Delete for privacy reasons. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:51, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Q29876543Edit

Fubuki (Q29876543): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a notable character Flixwito ^(•‿•)^ 08:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

In the item linking to this, the qualifier "character role = Q29876543", may be replaced with the qualifier "name of the character role = Fubuki". Similar with Q29966666 that nominated below. --Wolverène (talk) 10:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@Wolverène: Done, including those that nominated below. Flixwito ^(•‿•)^ 04:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Italian Ministers without PortfolioEdit

Q55074436: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q55074645: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q55075924: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q55074412: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q55065216: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q55178176: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not existed BohemianRhapsody (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@BohemianRhapsody: could you explain a bit more ? @ValterVB: could you explain why you created/needed this item? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: Literally, Q55178176 means "minister for institutional reforms and for regional affairs". But in Italy we don't have such a minister.

We have a "minister for institutional reforms" (minister for institutional reforms (Q55024178)) and we have a "minister for regional affairs" (Italian Minister of Regional Affairs and Autonomies (Q33125109)).

It has happened three times (from 1988 to 1992) that this two positions were held by the same person, but this doesn't mean that it is a new position and it doesn't mean that we need this item on Wikidata.--BohemianRhapsody (talk) 16:26, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Ok, thanks @BohemianRhapsody: for the explanation,

Delete then. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:09, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for late replay:

Q55074436: Piero Gnudi (Q2312135) minister in Monti Cabinet (Q715614) source
Q55074645: Raffaele Fitto (Q1060314) minister in Berlusconi IV Cabinet (Q715959) source
Q55075924: Giovanna Melandri (Q447895) minister in Prodi II Cabinet (Q1720224) source
Q55074412: Piero Gnudi (Q2312135) minister in Monti Cabinet (Q715614) source
Q55065216: Josefa Idem (Q248926) minister in Letta Cabinet (Q12080459) source
Q55178176: Mino Martinazzoli (Q726118) minister in Andreotti VII Cabinet (Q3111867) source

In some cases the name of the ministry changed during the legislature, see the footnotes --ValterVB (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Simon Villeneuve/ArchivesEdit

Want to reorganise my archives --Simon Villeneuve (talk) 12:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

This is a user talk page that was replaced by Flow; if it is deleted the history should be merged somewhere. Peter James (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Q2107396Edit

Praesidium (Q2107396): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Conflicts with Q2115302. Both pages relate to the same concept (Praesidium). --LitigiousOx (talk) 08:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

presidium (Q2115302) is a subclass of public institution (Q294163); Q2107396 is a disambiguation page. There is another disambiguation page presidium (Q50569257) but I don't know if it should be merged to Q2107396; different spellings are used in the linked pages. Peter James (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Q65119761Edit

Simon Villeneuve (Q65119761): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Almost empty item, no IDs, no pages linked --Nomen ad hoc (talk) 12:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

@Antoine2711, Simon Villeneuve: Thoughts? Mahir256 (talk) 03:51, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm not that Simon Villeneuve and I don't have any opinion about this person. Simon Villeneuve (talk) 11:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Many items created by Antoine2711bot are almost empty and have no links to them. This has been mentioned at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Antoine2711bot but without a link to the source or addition of more data they should be deleted. These items seem to be associated with films, and IMDB lists two people with the name Simon Villeneuve but this one is probably https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3486790/ - one of several items that could be linked from Radius (Q48672827) and possibly other items. Peter James (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Peter James, Simon Villeneuve: Yes, I see that I nissed a link for all those created items. I'll fix that in the next hours. Thanks for pointing out. And yes, this Simon is not the same as our Simon here! ;-) --Antoine2711 (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

@Antoine2711: One month later, this page has not been touched and still is not linked to anything. Did you ever perform the fixes you described? Mahir256 (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@ Mahir256: Yes, I will do them, I'm just busy on another project right now. Still one week to my other project. --Antoine2711 (talk) 20:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Q62573092Edit

Somdip Dey (Q62573092): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks. en:Somdip Dey was deleted 3 times and corresponding draft 4 times. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC) Taivo (talk) 15:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Keep seems notable enough for Wikidata, VIGNERON (talk) 11:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Q31497834Edit

Q31497834: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Corresponding page in Tewiki is redirected Chaduvari (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

@Chaduvari: It seems to be a place that exists as it is mentioned on the redirection target (no idea what it says there though). I added a P131. --- Jura 12:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
The name is similar, and the redirect is to Bhaskar Nagar (Q4901348), a village. Possibly the same place - I don't know if the ending has any meaning. Peter James (talk) 13:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Q32339693 (and 3157 similar categories)Edit

Category:Consensual deletions from 30 July 2014 (Q32339693): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems to be explicitly excluded on Wikidata:Notability/Exclusion criteria. Same for the 3157 other categories on https://w.wiki/898 --- Jura 05:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

@GZWDer: who created Q32339693 and possibly others. --- Jura 06:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I suppose for good form, I should list them here directly. --- Jura 11:30, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

@Jura1: I'm willing to get started on these soon, but I notice that there are also categories of the forms "Cancellazioni con votazione" and plain "Cancellazioni" with dates (see Q32103028 and Q32103022 for example). If you think those items should also be deleted, and if you can also enumerate those for good form, then I can deal with those as well. Mahir256 (talk) 05:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- My request is just for the above. Initially, I identified them with PetScan, maybe that could work for the ones you want to delete as well. --- Jura 05:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Q30028540Edit

Palazzolo Acreide (Q30028540): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The true item is Palazzolo Acreide (Q489260) --Elyparker (talk) 13:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

One is a town, the other is the comune in which it is located. If these are the same they can be merged and one replaced with instance of (P31):Wikimedia duplicated page (Q17362920) (similar to many civil parishes in the UK) as the Cebuano Wikipedia has pages for both. Peter James (talk) 22:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Q18003534Edit

old and new castle Bümpliz (Q18003534): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Double entry --Jwilderm (talk) 13:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

This seems to be for a site with two castles and shouldn't have been blanked.[7] There is an item for each castle but the heritage status and identifier are for the combined site. Peter James (talk) 22:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Keep per @Peter James:, @Jwilderm: double entry like this one is quite common. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Q67282399Edit

Q67282399: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Personaggio scambiato per Vincenzo Romeo Burgundo (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Q2201604Edit

Maura Renardel de Lavalette (Q2201604): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Trijnstel (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Keep @Trijnstel: not empty at all and seems notable for Wikidata, are you sure you're talking about the right item? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Q66811114Edit

Q66811114: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Trijnstel (talk) 14:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Linked to Vangrail (Q2358576), added a source. Edoderoo (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:10, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Keep @Trijnstel: not empty at all and seems notable for Wikidata (per point 3 of Wd:N). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Q55096751Edit

Jesús Ángel Pérez Casas (Q55096751): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Just a name - no information at all Bahnmoeller (talk) 10:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Identifiers at https://viaf.org/viaf/46798042/ may be the same person, also possibly http://www.museodezaragoza.es/homenaje-postumo-a-jesus-angel-perez-casas/ and http://w.aragon.es/estaticos/GobiernoAragon/Departamentos/PoliticaTerritorialJusticiaInterior/Documentos/docs/Areas/Informaci%C3%B3n%20territorial/Publicaciones/Coleccion_Territorio/Comarca_Ribera_Alta_del_Ebro/DOCUMENTOS_BLOQUE_II._DE_LA_HISTORIA._1.pdf with dates of birth and death (6 January 1958 - 9 December 2000). Peter James (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata:True duplicates/2Edit

(delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty page; and I see no reason for having two pages about "true duplicates" --Nomen ad hoc (talk) 22:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

It used to contain data. It may act as record purposes. Esteban16 (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Q51940267Edit

Already exists as Q1866550 --MS-SPO (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

If the English Wikipedia article is correct, it's the same as poplin (Q1141566), not broadcloth (Q1866550), which is another, possibly unrelated, use of the term. Peter James (talk) 18:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

@MS-SPO: According to the different from (P1889) in both Q1866550 and Q51940267 they aren't the same and the property even lists a source for that. Also this property prevents the merging of the two. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 07:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Notifying the creator of the alleged duplicate: @PKM:. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: thanks for notifying me.

I thought I had made it pretty clear. There two entirely different fabrics called "broadcloth" in the USA. One is a (usually) cotton shirting fabric and the other is the traditional (usually) wool fabric that dates back to the middle ages. The Fairchild's Dictionary of Textiles (Q28888841) has two definitions of "broadcloth". Textile Terms and Definitions (Q52580215) makes the same distinction; the Inter-Active Terminology for Europe (Q1520860) cites this as a definition for "broad-cloth": "Definition: 1) a light-weight fabric of poplin type, used extensively on the North American continent for shirtings. 2) a cloth made from fine woollen yarns in a twill weave,heavily milled(traditionally approximately 90 in.in the loom for 56 in.finished)and given a dress face finish.It is usually dyed in dark colours." I've added the UK name "shirting poplin" (from Fairchild) and I will add the additional source and "name"/"valid in place" statements. - PKM (talk) 18:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

I have added the IATE terms for "cotton broadcloth" and "wool broadcloth" as other language labels for these two items, and I've changed the default EN label to "cotton broadcloth" to make the distinction clear. [Edited] - PKM (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Keep In case that wasn't obvious. :-) - PKM (talk) 19:11, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Q29640788Edit

Os Keyes (Q29640788): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The item contains sensitive information that was unfortunately put in (by me, I believe). Either the history should be hidden or the item should be entirely deleted. I think the delete option would be best. It is better to be on the safe side concerning sensitive information. See also the discussion for Q57904781 where I made a similar argument. --Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 08:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@Alain Schneider, Pigsonthewing, VIGNERON: You are the only ones discussing Q57904781. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment what the point of view of the person themself? Anyway, I'm more leaning toward Delete Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- For information, I asked directly to them and they said "I would like it deleted." so definitely a Delete for me. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 16:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Keep. Any inappropriate additions should of course be revision-deleted (which requires admin tools), but the item is sourced to valid external identifiers, and so meets our notability requirements. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

I can do the appropriate revdels if someone can email me what revision numbers specifically to revdel and whether the summaries and the contributor names of those revisions should also be hidden. Mahir256 (talk) 04:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q33104507Edit

quintic function (Q33104507): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q768390 is basically the same thing and Q33104507 should be merged into that. --Llucifer (talk) 08:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Functions and equations seem to have separate items. They should probably be linked. Peter James (talk) 13:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Lexeme:L64255Edit

בצפר (L64255): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Lexeme:L64347 --Uziel302 (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

@Uziel302: In this case, they can be merged. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Infovarius (talk • contribs).

@Uziel302: it's the same lemma, same language and same category but is it the same Lexeme? If so, indeed a merge is the solution. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

VIGNERON, please merge. Uziel302 (talk) 05:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Q68199391Edit

Catalogue of nebulae in Crux, Centaurus, Circinus and Norma. (Q68199391): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spurious entry. GZWDer (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Seems to be some other publication, rather than a journal, which explains its non-standard bibcode, but title and publisher are stated. Peter James (talk) 20:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Q51417962Edit

Q51417962: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Double with the Q51405496 item. I made some corrections before, now it is not necessary to keep two times the same topic. --Givet (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Givet: They have different identifiers. How can they be the same? Esteban16 (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Esteban16: You are right, at the beginning it is two scans on BHL of the same book (in fact two different "physical" objets - one of them with a complement to the author's name) so, OK, we refer here to these two scans but is it really important to have this double entry. There was many errors on these Wikidata pages and, of course, it is more difficult to complete perfectly two articles instead of one. But why not. Thank you very much for your comment and sorry for the inconvenience. Have a nice day :-) Givet (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Q8038180Edit

Wright Brand Foods (Q8038180): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unknown film, sitelinke moved to Q68659660 --- Jura 10:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

It wasn't a film. A bot added that because the item was without an "instance of" and the article contained an infobox intended for films (in this case, just to hold the company's logo). Peter James (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Surely. Good thing we have a correct item now and can delete the ill-defined one. --- Jura 16:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Q16445677Edit

Benjaminas Kordušas (Q16445677): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks ref, sitelink not about person: moved to Q68802066 --- Jura 15:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Why was the sitelink, which was there first, moved and not the statements added later? Peter James (talk) 16:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Because Wikidata doesn't repurpose items and there may be people named that way. --- Jura 16:27, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Which is why it should be restored to its original purpose before it was repurposed. Peter James (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Often, on creation, items are blank and one could argue that this should be restored and then the item used for something new. However, users of the final product would get disrupted.--- Jura 16:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Items with sitelinks are not blank. If an item is blank or it isn't possible to determine what it was intended to be about, then it should be deleted. In this case it was already known what it was about but an incorrect statement was added. Peter James (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Also for users of the final product it would be more useful to know we still have information on this, but that it was not a person; also to confirm that the original Q16445677 is the same as Q68802066 it would be necessary to check edit histories and logs, as sitelinks are not stable identifiers. Peter James (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

If it was about a person and now should be about a film, the QID wouldn't be stable.

You suggest we "salt" this in some way? I don't see the usefulness of keeping a QID that was incorrectly defined. --- Jura 12:36, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

I agree with @Peter James:, merging is the right solution here, the Qid would be back to it's original purpose. Te repurposing into a human (Q5) seems to be a mistake (ping @Holger1959: for confirmation). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Well, there is a person with that name, but he just not notable, at least as far as I can tell. Reusing it for something else, would be against the general principle of Wikidata not to repurpose items. You can't repurpose items just because someone agrees to it .. --- Jura 17:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Q44200685Edit

Stolperstein dedicated to Felix Ascher (Q44200685): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no Stone for Felix Ascher, only for Emilie, his sister Alice and Margot Doctor, see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Ascher_(Architekt) McSearch (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Q17334369Edit

Martins Indi (Q17334369): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fortuitous arrangements of Portuguese surnames are not productive: an individual person’s name should be linked to their own separate given names (usually two, seldom one) and surnames (usually 2 or 3, some times more, very seldom one); they are not even useful to find family relations, as they change typically in each generation and often even siblings do not share the same exact combo. (This may be valid to other cultures where multiple surnames are common practice, such as Spanish, but better have someone actually knowledgeable of Spanish and other onomastics to work on it.) Shoehorning the central/northern European anthroponym practice (two name words, surname last) to everybody’s personal names wont ultimately work and is a bad practice that have been pervasive both in Wikidata and in Commons (made worse thereon due to WD influence). Japanese, Hungarian, Icelandic, Russian, Korean, Spanish, Chinese, Portuguese, even French — all these have specific ways to depart more or less to what is percieved as the Only Possible Way and need to be properly covered instead. --Tuvalkin (talk) 14:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Delete: not a family name: unused, lacks reference. @Tuvalkin: --- Jura 11:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Q44200624Edit

Stolperstein dedicated to Georg Matzdorff (Q44200624): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Georg Matzdorff got no stone, only his wife got a stone, see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Matzdorff McSearch (talk) 15:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Q44200280Edit

Stolperstein dedicated to August Burchard (Q44200280): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

August Burchard doesn't has a stone, only his son, see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_Burchard_(Augenarzt) McSearch (talk) 14:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Q13354383Edit

Category:Cisjordania populated place stubs (Q13354383): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Single entry replaced on the frwiki by the one now in Category:Palestine populated place stubs (Q18929937), but that has a different subject: West Bank vs. Palestine, so items should probably not be merged. --- сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 10:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Q44199776Edit

Stolperstein dedicated to Georg Rothgießer (Q44199776): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

He didn't get a stone, see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Rothgie%C3%9Fer McSearch (talk) 18:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment indeed there seems to be a confusion with the stumbling stone for his niece. @Agathoclea: could you check this please? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

The creation was list based on the erronious category de:Kategorie:Person, für die ein Stolperstein verlegt wurde (Deutschland), which in turn sneaked in because of the backlink and obvious image in the article. McSearch is doing a great job of cleaning up those that I did not catch at the time. Agathoclea (talk) 17:03, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Q14537515Edit

Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg (Q14537515): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unmergable (kind of broken) duplicate of Q149433 without any use left anymore. This older and useless version blocks the renaming of the newer, current version. --TiMauzi (talk) 23:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Many identifiers have different values for both items. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Still the same entity. I will keep on merging more identifiers then... TiMauzi (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Q66870987Edit

Kelly Morgan (Q66870987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other items, or other indication of notability Jamie7687 (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Keep, but a weak keep, based on notability. I added data to the item. She is a "d-list" star on the teen circuit. Not a major icon, but is being publicized. It is just hard to find her specific hits because her name is so common as it can be written both forwards and backwards (Morgan Kelly/Kelly Morgan) and it is both male and female, then add in the fact that "teen" results get pushed down the list behind "top 20 name matches on linkedin" or the sports star or the actor, and so forth. Quakewoody (talk) 00:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:10, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Lexeme:L157090Edit

AMC (L157090): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a Lexeme --MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 18:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@Jura1: Thoughts? Mahir256 (talk) 15:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

It's a TLA. I just noticed that I made it for Q50219208 which would have been insufficient, but it can stand for any of w:AMC. Language code should be "mul", but language codes for Lexemes are still unfinished and I think development has stopped. --- Jura 15:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Q3099523Edit

Gautier Morberius (Q3099523): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as Q23612571 --2A02:2788:925:FAC7:C90B:CE3:4ED4:9F56 19:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

@יונה בנדלאק: Q23612571 has been deleted, without being merged. Was there anything to merge, or is everything already in Q3099523? Peter James (talk) 00:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

no additional data. I am not sure why I deleted it and didn't merge it. - yona b (talk) 10:20, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Q25485334Edit

Arja Lee (Q25485334): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not sure why this got repurposed/redirect. Item for actor is at Q61088477 --- Jura 11:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

It was originally about the actor.[8] Peter James (talk) 00:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Q28120422Edit

Playa de los Cocederos (Q28120422): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It's a wrong reference to the correct one Q69811961 (correct in name and coordinates). Prefer not to merge because most of the data would be noise. --Olea (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Q2072351Edit

Q2072351: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q2072351 has a swedish and a german article about the "Freedom of Movement" of natural persons. So they belong to Q1344824 which is somehow blocked by at least the german "Niederlassungsfreiheit" which is wrong in place as it is about movement of persons and organisations. --5glogger (talk) 08:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Historic Scotland redundant itemsEdit

The items listed under subheadings, below, relate to components of a Historic Environment Scotland listing - http://portal.historicenvironment.scot/designation/LB29261 "2-36 (EVEN NOS) LONDON STREET, INCLUDING RAILINGS AND LAMPS LB29261" (at least by virtue of having a Historic Scotland ID (P709) value of LB29261).

LB29261 is described on wikidata in the following ten items, following the approach taken for the remaining 70k HS items, and consistent with detailed data released by HS at- https://portal.historicenvironment.scot/spatialdownloads

The six items below, each of which has ~7 coordinates within it, do not mesh with the HS decomposition of LB29261, and are not required insofar as LB29261 is adaquately described in the ten items identified above.

I'm at around 300k edits into curation of Historic Scotland items, meaning I have my head well around the data; I'm thoroughly convinced this set should be deleted. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Edinburgh, 12 London Street (Q17575442): Keep doesn't strike me as redundant as it's for a specific building, even if that is part of a group. The same applies probably to the others above as well. --- Jura 18:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@Jura1: I'm not asking for Edinburgh, 12 London Street (Q17575442) to be deleted. It is the records below that are the deletion request. If we could concentrate on them, that would be useful. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

@Tagishsimon: Ok. Could you use the usual format for deletion requests: item(s) to be deleted then motivation. --- Jura 05:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

The first of these was created with coordinates for numbers 30, 36, 22-24, 32-34, 26-28, 16-18 and 12, and they were probably intended to be the first six of these; new items were created later. Peter James (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Possibly so. But the question is what to do with them now. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

They can be deleted. Peter James (talk) 12:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q70117211Edit

Quadient (Q70117211): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this entity notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes. Yes it is. Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 21:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Anyone other than the creator of the item have an opinion? Quakewoody (talk) 21:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

@Quakewoody: We could ask the French? w:fr:Neopost is theirs. @47dp, Eneljay, Alexfouch:? Btw, this is the reason Eugene is doing this. Well that, and probably this. - Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 21:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Is it a new entity or just a new name? Peter James (talk) 11:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

@Peter James: New name, new logo, new website, merge, change in organization. ("notamment en passant d'une structure de holding à une organisation intégrée et plus ciblée", Google translate: "moving from a holding structure to an integrated and more focused organization") "Quadient combines the capabilities of three Neopost sister companies, GMC Software, Human Inference and Satori Software into one technology portfolio of solutions designed to improve customer experience across print, digital and social channels." Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 15:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Could you kindly provide some reliable reference URL's for statements, in order to make us free at all from any doubts about notability? --Wolverène (talk) 05:56, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

@Wolverène: w:fr:Neopost isn't enough? Eugene doesn't do any research. Never. He's not interested. He calls the notability of anything into question. He only started this deletion request to bring Commons drama over here. - Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 18:47, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Alexis Jazz: You're just causing more drama with your controversial comments. These sources state that "Neopost" changed its name to "Quadient". w:fr:Neopost says the same, but it hasn't been renamed, which I assume is because the company name change is in progress or is not official yet. If I am right, only one item should exist, merging Quadient (Q70117211) with Neopost (Q1977631). But if you say they're different entities, I would like you to demonstrate it. Esteban16 (talk) 22:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

@Esteban16: Do I understand correctly you want to delete it and then undelete it once the name change is official? Or if you are just asking for the difference (besides the obvious): Quadient includes d:Q20878537. (and some other stuff that doesn't have a Wikidata item) Neopost does not. - Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 22:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Alexis Jazz: I want you to clarify whether they're different entities or not. You said above that it was a "new name, new logo, new website, merge, change in organization", and I didn't get that at all. If they're different, it is okay, but if they're the same, then merging should be done. Esteban16 (talk) 23:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Q5768379Edit

Hippo signaling pathway (Q5768379): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant with hippo signaling (Q14914369) (see aliases) --AlexanderPico (talk) 23:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Q2072391Edit

personal protection (Q2072391): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty Antemister (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

The link is from the associated category Q16659698. Links were moved to bodyguard (Q851436), but that item has a category Category:Bodyguards (Q7484695), which is a subcategory of Q17312863, and Q17312863 is a subcategory of Q16659698. Peter James (talk) 18:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Q2163194Edit

Tân Phong (Q2163194): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant w/ Tân Phong (Q7862085), merge completed. --Rosguill (talk) 21:53, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

KEEP. One points to a disambiguation page. One points to an article of one of the pages on the disambiguation page. Someone should check to make sure all the information is on the correct items and that proper descriptions are used. But there is no reason to delete or merge. Quakewoody (talk) 11:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Q10806079Edit

Phú Thuận (Q10806079): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Completed merge w/ Phú Thuận (Q7189882) --Rosguill (talk) 21:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

KEEP. One points to a disambiguation page. One points to an article of one of the pages on the disambiguation page. Someone should check to make sure all the information is on the correct items and that proper descriptions are used. But there is no reason to delete or merge. Quakewoody (talk) 11:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Q2587904Edit

Phú Lộc (Q2587904): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merged with Phú Lộc (Q7189875) --Rosguill (talk) 22:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

KEEP. One points to a disambiguation page. One points to an article of one of the pages on the disambiguation page. Someone should check to make sure all the information is on the correct items and that proper descriptions are used. But there is no reason to delete or merge. Quakewoody (talk) 11:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Q68825631Edit

Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology Pack (Q68825631): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Mistake: a pack is not a revue Manu1400 (talk) 00:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology Pack Online (Q68825636) is similar; the journal is Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology (Q62698055) for both print and online. Peter James (talk) 18:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Q50985937Edit

Joseph Carrillo (Q50985937): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Being spammed, not notable for any Wikimedia project. Vermont (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

I am going to agree that he was not notable. But he seems to have turned trolling into an art form, to the point that he may be notable. Much the same as Q58528075 - the notability isn't from the music, it is from the trolling. Quakewoody (talk) 17:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
The IPI name number looks unusual for just an another self-promoting performer. May it affect the decision about the deletion? And how hard is to get an IPI ID? --Wolverène (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

@Wolverène An IPI number is not a big deal. They are "purchased" via membership. Basically one step above a Wiki or facebook page. And the weirdest part, you will rarely see a drummer have one - doesn't matter how famous. The sad part, an ISNI number, which is a qualified identifier, is starting to mean nothing as they can be earned via spam/fraud/hoaxes if you know which sites to hit. Quakewoody (talk) 18:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Short version - An IPI number is assigned to a songwriter (not performers) when the songwriter joins a service like BMI or ASCAP (among others). A songwriter does not even need to submit any songs to be a member and have a number, but dues must be paid. Quakewoody (talk) 18:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! --Wolverène (talk) 18:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Q12359819Edit

Assai (Q12359819): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Should be a lexeme Swpb (talk) 17:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Leave it to the Estonian Wikipedia users, they have the article about this word and we can't delete this item until they delete the connected article. --Wolverène (talk) 04:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Accidentally created a duplicateEdit

Hi, Category:Eurovision Song Contest entrants of 2020 (Q61260586) did exist, but the interwiki links didn't show up at the local Wikipedia pages. Then I accidentally created a duplicate at Q70988045, but they cannot be merged because the two items contain the same sitelinks, which should not be possible right? Maybe there is a bug in the software? Q70988045 should probably be merged, but I can't do it. - FakirNL (talk) 09:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Mmm... how weird it is. I removed sitelinks from Q70988045 but it didn't help... --Wolverène (talk) 09:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Some of the sitelinks in Q61260586 were also in Q70971741 and Q71125215. Peter James (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Q70879042Edit

Amadè Toure (Q70879042): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 09:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

An IMDB identifier can be added (nm0869620), and there was a link from Grandmother (Q3571220) - why was this removed? Peter James (talk) 11:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

This name appears on at least one wikipedia article as a cast of that movie. I have done 0 research outside of that. But I would definitely revert the removal of their names from the movie's item and vote keep if the nominator doesn't give a reason for their removals. Quakewoody (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Q70878801Edit

Sibidou Ouedraogo (Q70878801): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 09:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

An IMDB identifier can be added (nm0653741), and there was a link from Grandmother (Q3571220) - why was this removed? Peter James (talk) 11:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

This name appears on at least one wikipedia article as a cast of that movie. I have done 0 research outside of that. But I would definitely revert the removal of their names from the movie's item and vote keep if the nominator doesn't give a reason for their removals. Quakewoody (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Q70878976Edit

Assita Ouedraogo (Q70878976): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 09:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

An IMDB identifier can be added (nm0653450), and there was a link from Grandmother (Q3571220) - why was this removed? Peter James (talk) 11:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

This name appears on at least one wikipedia article as a cast of that movie. I have done 0 research outside of that. But I would definitely revert the removal of their names from the movie's item and vote keep if the nominator doesn't give a reason for their removals. Quakewoody (talk) 15:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Q70878517Edit

Kinda Moumouni (Q70878517): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 09:54, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

An IMDB identifier can be added (nm0609788), and there was a link from Grandmother (Q3571220) - why was this removed? Peter James (talk) 11:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

This name appears on at least one wikipedia article as a cast of that movie. I have done 0 research outside of that. But I would definitely revert the removal of their names from the movie's item and vote keep if the nominator doesn't give a reason for their removals. Quakewoody (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Q70878436Edit

Zenabou Ouedraogo (Q70878436): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. MovieFex (talk) 09:54, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

An IMDB identifier can be added (nm0653475), and there was a link from Grandmother (Q3571220) - why was this removed? Peter James (talk) 11:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

This name appears on at least one wikipedia article as a cast of that movie. I have done 0 research outside of that. But I would definitely revert the removal of their names from the movie's item and vote keep if the nominator doesn't give a reason for their removals. Quakewoody (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Q56708496Edit

Wojciech Ścigała (Q56708496): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It is me and I do not want to be listed. --Wojtus (talk) 10:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

While I know how invasive it can seem to have others know more about me than I know about me. I am wondering if any of the information is incorrect? And, also, do you for some reason feel that you are not notable and don't deserve an item? Basically, other than your (unconfirmed) claim of it being you, what reason would there be not to have it. Quakewoody (talk) 14:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

No references or identifiers, there's only an empty Commons category, and that is likely to be deleted. Peter James (talk) 15:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

See, I don't know that because I didn't open it. The nominator didn't say any of that. He just said he didn't want it here. Quakewoody (talk)

Q71135219Edit

Elizabeth Buttner (Q71135219): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unabsichtlich doppelt angelegt (Q71135219) Kommerz (talk) 13:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

I don't see a 2nd instance of the same person. Unless the scientist is also the film critic? Quakewoody (talk) 14:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

GND identifiers match, and "occupation: scientist" has the qualifier "field of work: film" - film scholar (Q4220878) would probably be more accurate. Peter James (talk) 15:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Well, in that instance, I would support deletion/merging. Quakewoody (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Q66467301Edit

health of Basshunter (Q66467301): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No actual content (just says that it is instance of (P31) certain aspects of a person's life (Q20127274) / of (P642) Basshunter (Q383541)) - unneeded DannyS712 (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

The only link is Basshunter (Q383541) medical condition (P1050) Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (Q191779) / statement is subject of (P805) health of Basshunter (Q66467301), but Q66467301 doesn't actually have any info about Basshunter (Q383541) medical condition (P1050) Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (Q191779) --DannyS712 (talk) 17:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

@DannyS712: I have added some information. Eurohunter (talk) 22:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q70342053Edit

David Carson (Q70342053): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

See https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=865409019 and https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions&diff=prev&oldid=1026895325 Habertix (talk) 20:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Unfortunately, he now has an ISNI number. Which, unless WD changed the rules, is considered a qualified identifier (I hope I used the right term). Quakewoody (talk) 22:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
For me there's no big deal if it will be kept, as the ISNI ID exists. For Wikidata it's not normally important how a Wikipedia project qualifies persons and their projects. Spamming is not that big sin comparing to creating hoaxes or adding obvious vandalism. --Wolverène (talk) 09:22, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Q71064216Edit

Esta repetido ya existia anterirmente —Juancar22 (talk) 09:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

@Juancar22: Please only use WD:PFD when you're requesting properties to be deleted. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Q71134696Edit

Request for deletion, Reason "Herbert Kleinbruckner" Q71134696 is a Doublette of his Alias "Gautam Q29614162".--Stephan Tournay (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

@Stephan Tournay: Please only use WD:PFD when you're requesting properties to be deleted. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Q3595829Edit

I think the name, Bahauddeen Kooriyad is the second name of Bahauddeen Muhammed Nadwi. Wikipedia articles written about him were deleted early. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bahauddeen_Muhammed_Nadwi Kutyava (talk) 10:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

@Kutyava: The Bengali page still exists, but is now linked to Q71200674, and the Urdu and Arabic articles also exist, but are not linked to any Wikidata item. Probably notable as vice-chancellor (Q19542123) of Darul Huda (Q3595823). Peter James (talk) 12:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

The statements need checking for accuracy, I removed a date of death that wasn't verified and was probably false, and there are two dates of birth currently stated. Peter James (talk) 14:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Historic Scotland redundant items 2Edit

The items listed under subheadings, below, relate to components of a Historic Environment Scotland listing - http://portal.historicenvironment.scot/designation/LB25075 "73-99 (ODD NOS) COMMERCIAL STREET/15, 17 MEADOWSIDE/2-10 (EVEN NOS) MURRAYGATE" (at least by virtue of having a Historic Scotland ID (P709) value of LB25075).

LB25075 is described on wikidata in the following six items, following the approach taken for the remaining 70k HS items, and consistent with detailed data released by HS at- https://portal.historicenvironment.scot/spatialdownloads

The three items below, each of which has ~3 coordinates within it, do not mesh with the HS decomposition of LB25075, and are not required insofar as LB25075 is adaquately described in the ten items identified above.

I'm at around 320k edits into curation of Historic Scotland items, meaning I have my head well around the data; I'm thoroughly convinced the set below should be deleted. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Q17575430Edit

Q17575430: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q17575431Edit

Q17575431: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q17575433Edit

Q17575433: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

They can be deleted, the correct items are Q17902833, Q17902836, Q17902839. Peter James (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Items by User:GuadamojeteEdit

María del Carmen Escobar Molina (Q69880577): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Antonio García Navarro (Q69880174): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Antonio García Galisteo (Q70599945): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Amalia Resines Ruiz de Rebolledo (Q69917302): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

José Ramón Fernández Quevedo (Q69916972): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Balbina Valiente Andrés (Q69895986): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

José Díaz Aparicio (Q69895637): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Rafaela Ruiz Melgarejo (Q69894699): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Julia Segovia García (Q69894076): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

María Concepción Varona García de Mardones (Q69892851): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Rosa Dasca Cariteu (Q69891436): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Magdalena Penella Silva (Q69822119): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Magdalena Penella Silva (Q69822119): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Emilio Díaz Navas (Q69894516): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Emilio Díaz Navas (Q69894516): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Emilio López Salas (Q69893552): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Irrelevant! Vanbasten 23 (talk) 08:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

@Vanbasten 23: Por favor explíquenos por qué esos ítemes son irrelevantes. ¿Son spam? ¿Son vacíos? ¿Son sin notabilidad de otra manera? Mahir256 (talk) 08:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

El usuario está creando los familiares directos de personas relevantes. Padres y hermanos de artistas que entiendo que no tienen relevancia por sí mismos (no tienen profesión, ni otros datos que lo afirmen, solo ser familiares). Un saludo. --Vanbasten 23 (talk) 08:48, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q68164383Edit

Q68164383: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Clochers.org item does not exist Peter17 (talk) 11:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

The identifier combines the new department with the old INSEE code; their URLs still use the old department although they can be found via with the new one. This is a duplicate of Q29550711, which has the correct identifier (although one based on old boundaries). Others are:

Q68159463, duplicate of Q41772591
Q68159468, duplicate of Q60372091
Q68159469, duplicate of Q60363891

If these are likely to be recreated, they can be merged with the invalid identifiers set to deprecated; I don't know if they will eventually replace the identifiers with ones based on the new codes. Peter James (talk) 14:01, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q68164859Edit

Q68164859: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Identifier not found on clochers.org; incomplete name. Not an error caused by boundary changes; Le Mas-d'Azil (Q1084645) is a long way from Bourbon-l'Archambault (Q245080). Peter James (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q68164683Edit

Q68164683: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Identifier not found on clochers.org, and incomplete name. Change "74" to "73" and it's a valid identifier, not used in Wikidata, for what appears to be a combination of Q38582368 and Q60363254 - if these churches have merged, maybe a new item is needed, but that is in Bozel, and not in Dingy-Saint-Clair. Peter James (talk) 14:21, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q7029797Edit

Nicolas Sadirac (Q7029797): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted everywhere (inter-wiki spam ads) (1). NOT "serious and publicly available references" (2). NOT "fulfills a structural need" (3). See WD:N. --EulerObama (talk) 18:34, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q68572459Edit

Hottentottentetracontane (Q68572459): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unlikely name, mass is wrong for chemical formula - hoax? Peter James (talk) 20:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

agree it looks like a hoax Andrew Gray (talk) 07:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Q24249439Edit

slowness (Q24249439): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unneeded (similar to Q47494327) Infovarius (talk) 21:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q24249439 has a sitelink, which is why it was not deleted; I don't think Q47494327 had any. Peter James (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q12049850Edit

Q12049850: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear meaning, formerly included one redirecting sitelink, not needed in the current ontology Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 06:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Q24190678Edit

Melbourne bus route 509 (Q24190678): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Orphaned as its only link, a Wikipedia article, was deleted -- numbermaniac (talk) 07:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Finnish elections (Q8468969)Edit

Should be merged with "Template:Finnish elections (Q18695246)".95.175.104.142 09:43, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for deletions

Contents

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}Edit

RequestsEdit

~410 Azerbaijani filmsEdit

Cleopatra (disambiguation)Edit

Bulk deletion request: empty items by User:TdombosEdit

Italian Ministers without PortfolioEdit

Q32339693 (and 3157 similar categories)Edit

Historic Scotland redundant itemsEdit

Accidentally created a duplicateEdit

Historic Scotland redundant items 2Edit

Items by User:GuadamojeteEdit

Template:Finnish elections (Q8468969)Edit

Pages tagged with `{{Delete}}`Edit