Wikidata:Requests for permissions/RfRollback/April 2018
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
NewDataB
NewDataB (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I'm patroller on wiki-it and wiki-es, I have a lot of experience reverting vandalism--NewDataB (talk) 11:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC) NewDataB
Done --Eurodyne (talk) 00:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Clarkcj12
Clarkcj12 (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I have been fixing alot of vandalism these days. I am an established Wikipedia, with the rollback rights on simple.wiki and en.wiki. Clarkcj12 (talk) 04:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- I don't see a lot of experience reverting vandalism here. Can you provide some examples? -- Ajraddatz (talk) 23:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Ajraddatz: I do no have much experience on Wikdata on reverting vandalism, due to the fact its hard to do patrolling with all of the quick statements going on so it floods the rc. Also it is a little hard without being able to use the Twinkle option that a lot of the other wiki's have. So it makes it a little bit more time consuming. But with the tool it will allow me to quickly revert vandalism should I come across it. On Simple Pedia, I have had it since 2014, on simple. Since 2013 on English Wikipedia I have had it, with no problems with my reverts, so I am aware that the tool is of course not to be used with edit wars, or 3RR unless obvious vandalism. I have recently had to restore back to way before vandalism happened on Q656812. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Clarkcj12: regarding the RC part, you could use these configurations to filter the edits and avoid the flood you describe. The volume of the edits contained in this list is more than manageable and you can catch most of the vandalistic edits. --Kostas20142 (talk) 12:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Ajraddatz: I do no have much experience on Wikdata on reverting vandalism, due to the fact its hard to do patrolling with all of the quick statements going on so it floods the rc. Also it is a little hard without being able to use the Twinkle option that a lot of the other wiki's have. So it makes it a little bit more time consuming. But with the tool it will allow me to quickly revert vandalism should I come across it. On Simple Pedia, I have had it since 2014, on simple. Since 2013 on English Wikipedia I have had it, with no problems with my reverts, so I am aware that the tool is of course not to be used with edit wars, or 3RR unless obvious vandalism. I have recently had to restore back to way before vandalism happened on Q656812. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Clarkcj12: any new comment? --Alaa :)..! 11:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Not much new comment. Clarkcj12 (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Not done --Alaa :)..! 12:59, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kalendar
Kalendar (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Регулярно анализирую [1], приходится отменять много вандальных правок. Являюсь откатывающим в Русской Википедии. // Regularly analyze [2], it is necessary to cancel many vandal corrections. I'm rolling back in Russian Wikipedia. Kalendar (talk) 05:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Done --Alaa :)..! 09:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
MovieFex
MovieFex (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Often enough I am faced with vandalism so it would be practical to have this possibility. MovieFex (talk) 17:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Done--Ymblanter (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)