Modeling of multiple qualifiers in constraint statements

edit

How do we model a constraint with multiple mandatory qualifiers, e. g. “stock exchange (P414) must have both ticker symbol (P249) and start time (P580)”, in constraint statements? I see two possibilities:

  • One statement:
  • Two statements:

If we choose the second one, then we can instead interpret the first statement as “stock exchange (P414) must have at least one of ticker symbol (P249) and start time (P580)”. This would increase the expressive power of the constraint type, but at the cost of making it potentially more confusing: I suspect that the first possibility is the more natural one.

(I’m not sure who to ping for this discussion, but I think at least JakobVoss (talkcontribslogs), Ivan A. Krestinin (talkcontribslogs) and Jonas Kress (WMDE) (talkcontribslogs) could be interested – feel free to include more.)

--Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE) (talk) 20:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Just to make sure I’m understanding you correctly – your module reports an error if a property constraint (P2302)required qualifier constraint (Q21510856) statement has more than one property (P2306) qualifier? --Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE) (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Notified participants of WikiProject property constraints --- Jura 10:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Property constraints portal/Required qualifiers" page.