Property talk:P444

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Jean-Frédéric in topic Usage on the review items itself?

Documentation

review score
review score received by a creative work or other entity
Representsassessment (Q851176)
Data typeString
Template parameterw:Template:Video_game_reviews for games, other methods and templates for films, books, albums, etc.
Domainwork (Q386724), organization (Q43229), venue (Q17350442), company (Q783794), award (Q618779), product (Q2424752), physical location (Q17334923), group of video games often treated as a singular game (Q116779426) or SCP (Q81113235)
Allowed valuesusually numbers from 0.0 to 10, 0 to 100, or letters from A+ to F- (depends on the type of creative work, and score issuer) (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleSinistar (Q7524416) → 80/100
Wikidata (Q2013) → 3.7/5
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P444 (Q20989968)
See alsoreview score by (P447), test score (P5022), review of (P6977), number of reviews/ratings (P7887)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total130,711
Main statement123,02994.1% of uses
Qualifier7,6695.9% of uses
Reference13<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: Canada Goose (Q26733), non-denial denial (Q7048894), Staphylococcus aureus (Q188121), smallpox vaccine (Q1037810)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#Type Q386724, Q43229, Q17350442, Q783794, Q618779, Q2424752, Q17334923, Q116779426, Q81113235, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#Scope, SPARQL
Conflicts with “instance of (P31): human (Q5): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#Conflicts with P31, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL
Conflicts with “reviewed by (P4032): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#Conflicts with P4032, search, SPARQL
Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#citation needed
 
Check values like 3/10
(Help)
Violations query: SELECT ?item ?note ?before ?after { ?item wdt:P444 ?note. FILTER (CONTAINS(STR(?note), "/")) BIND (STRBEFORE(?note, "/") AS ?before) BIND (STRBEFORE(?note, "/") AS ?after) FILTER (xsd:float(?before) < xsd:float(?after)) }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P444#Check values like 3/10
 

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

format constraint edit

i just protected the ., otherwise it stands for any character and added A+ to F-, as said in allowed values.--Akkakk 08:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Domain edit

Lots more things than works are reviewed: restaurants, charities, hotels, etc. I've relaxed the constraints accordingly. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Pigsonthewing:, maybe, you should somehow relax them a bit more? For example, see Q202163#P444. Wikisaurus (talk) 07:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
I've added "venue" as an allowable class. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 07:18, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Convert to Percentage edit

Perhaps this property would be more useful if the values were converted to a percentages? Perhaps this field should be converted from a String to a Quantity? U+1F360 (talk) 16:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I oppose considering values as percentage because many reviewers use different types of reviews. I wanted to support converting it to quantity, but then I saw Team Fortress 2 (Q382108); a showcase item. See the review score by 1UP.com for example; it's "A". Ahmadtalk 09:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Usage on the review items itself? edit

Telling Lies review – endless possibilities in brilliant detective story (Q66733562) is the review of a work (Telling Lies (Q62529754)).

I understand the main use case for review score (P444) is to be on the work, but I think it also makes sense to have it on the review − in which case, the mandatory qualifier review score by (P447) does not make much sense.

Thoughts?

Jean-Fred (talk) 13:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Jean-Frédéric: let's add a statement is subject of (P805) in cases like these?! Shisma (talk) 09:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I agree that would make sense. Jean-Fred (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Return to "P444" page.