(Q48081855)

8 February 2018

title

Views of primary care providers regarding the return of genome sequencing incidental findings (English)

1 reference

8 February 2018

0 references

K A Strong

1

1 reference

8 February 2018

K L Zusevics

series ordinal

2

1 reference

8 February 2018

D Bick

series ordinal

3

1 reference

8 February 2018

R Veith

series ordinal

4

1 reference

8 February 2018

publication date

20 May 2014

1 reference

8 February 2018

published in

Clinical Genetics

1 reference

8 February 2018

volume

86

1 reference

8 February 2018

issue

5

1 reference

8 February 2018

page(s)

461-468

1 reference

8 February 2018

Whole exome and whole genome sequencing

cites work

1 reference

ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing

21 January 2018

1 reference

Next-generation sequencing: impact of exome sequencing in characterizing Mendelian disorders

21 January 2018

1 reference

The National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program: insights into rare diseases

21 January 2018

1 reference

Rapid whole-genome sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units

21 January 2018

1 reference

Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing

21 January 2018

1 reference

Next generation sequencing in cancer research and clinical application

21 January 2018

1 reference

State of play in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for lifestyle-related diseases: market, marketing content, user experiences and regulation

21 January 2018

1 reference

Genetic tests obtainable through pharmacies: the good, the bad, and the ugly

21 January 2018

1 reference

Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics

21 January 2018

1 reference

Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study

21 January 2018

1 reference

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing

21 January 2018

1 reference

Managing incidental genomic findings: legal obligations of clinicians

21 January 2018

1 reference

Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice

21 January 2018

1 reference

Incidental medical information in whole-exome sequencing

21 January 2018

1 reference

Reflecting on earlier experiences with unsolicited findings: points to consider for next-generation sequencing and informed consent in diagnostics

21 January 2018

1 reference

Reporting genomic sequencing results to ordering clinicians: incidental, but not exceptional

21 January 2018

1 reference

Genetic incidental findings: autonomy regained?

21 January 2018

1 reference

When is a medical finding "incidental"?

21 January 2018

1 reference

Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings

21 January 2018

1 reference

Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification

21 January 2018

1 reference

ACMG recommendations on incidental findings are flawed scientifically and ethically

21 January 2018

1 reference

A closer look at the recommended criteria for disclosing genetic results: perspectives of medical genetic specialists, genomic researchers, and institutional review board chairs

21 January 2018

1 reference

Return of secondary genomic findings vs patient autonomy: implications for medical care

21 January 2018

1 reference

Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making

21 January 2018

1 reference

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!

21 January 2018

1 reference

Who's on first in exome and whole genome sequencing? Is it the patient or the incidental findings?

21 January 2018

1 reference

Return of individual research results and incidental findings: facing the challenges of translational science

21 January 2018

1 reference

Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions

21 January 2018

1 reference

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children

21 January 2018

1 reference

Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing

21 January 2018

1 reference

Professional perspectives about pharmacogenetic testing and managing ancillary findings

21 January 2018

1 reference

'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing

21 January 2018

1 reference

Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).

21 January 2018

1 reference

Physicians' perspectives on the uncertainties and implications of chromosomal microarray testing of children and families

21 January 2018

1 reference

Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information

21 January 2018

1 reference

Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing

21 January 2018

1 reference

“I want to know what's in Pandora's box”: Comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing

21 January 2018

1 reference

Maternal perspectives on the return of genetic results: context matters

21 January 2018

1 reference

Genomic test validation for incidental findings

21 January 2018

1 reference

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

10.1111/CGE.12390

1 reference

8 February 2018

1 reference

8 February 2018