Allknowingroger

Overly broad main subject additions

I've had a quick scan over your recent edits and am slightly concerned about how broad your automated edits of main subject (P921) are. As I mentioned earlier in regards to your bulk edits of the main subject rover (Q643962), it's best to add the "final" link in the ontology. Things like adding chimpanzee (Q4126704) to an article about Western chimpanzees like Locking plate femur fracture repair in a juvenile Western chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) in Sierra Leone (Q98304976) (as you did here) is somewhat useful, however it would be much better off with Western chimpanzee (Q3297541). The WikiProject Ontology is a great place to learn about that sort of thing.

I'm also a little worried about how you're filtering your data before you carry out these mass edits, this entity already had a main subject that was a subclass of chimpanzee. Had you added a '+' after the main subject like this ?item wdt:P921+ wd:Q4126704 . in the query this would have been avoided (assuming you got your input data from a SPARQL query).

Please let me know if there's any way I can help out with queries and such! I don't wont to dissuade you from doing these edits, having articles with main subject (P921) is really useful, especially for tools like Scholia, however (in my opinion) it's way better to have a little good data than a lot of messy data. Thanks! Aluxosm (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Just seen a few things like this as well. Similar to the problems with the rover edits, there is a big difference between an elephant seal (Q185231) and an elephant (Q7378) 😬! Please spend a little more time going over the edits before you press that button, as you saw earlier it's somewhat easy to revert things but it still takes time, effort, and makes a lot of notification noise. Thanks again! Aluxosm (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

These errors don't seem to be particularly uncommon unfortunately. Like this, an elephant shrew is not the same thing as an elephant. Or this, an article that includes the idiom "elephant in the room" is unlikely to be talking about the physics of having such a heavy animal in a building 😉. Cleaning up stuff like this takes a lot of work so I'll ask again as nicely as I can; please slow down and pay a bit more attention to your edits! Cheers. Aluxosm (talk) 16:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

• happy to revert elephant batch

In general I mostly do super-specific science topics to avoid this issue. When there's a million articles needing to be linked, there's no other option than mass edits. Allknowingroger (talk) 12:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Fair enough, that would certainly help in this regard. Still doesn't hurt to check over your input though; it only takes a minute to have a quick look, notice something like "elephant seal", then just search and remove all instances of that term. At the very least it'd get people like me off your back haha. I do appreciate your efforts, as I mentioned before main subject (P921) makes scholarly article (Q13442814) items so much more usable. Cheers! Aluxosm (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Adding incorrect image to painting

Hi Allknowingroger, can you please explain why you added File:El Buen Pastor, copia del siglo XIX (Museo de Bellas Artes de Córdoba).jpg to The Good Shepherd (Q64786777)? It's an image of a completely different painting. Multichill (talk) 20:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Adding incorrect image to war memorial

This is also vandalism!!! completely different war memorial!!! Triplec85 (talk) 22:10, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Also vandalism completely different war memorial!!! Triplec85 (talk) 22:10, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

STOP THIS !!! Triplec85 (talk)