Wikidata:Property proposal/Commons category for the interior of the item
Commons category for the interior of the item
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Sister projects
Description | Commons category for multimedia files depicting interior views of this item (object, place) |
---|---|
Represents | interior (Q2998430) |
Data type | Item |
Domain | item |
Allowed values | [^{}\[\]<>]+ |
Example 1 | Union Station (Q861473) → Category:Interior of Union Station (Portland) (Q73397870) |
Example 2 | Raio Palace (Q7285026) → Category:Interior of Palácio do Raio (Q73397950) |
Example 3 | Church of Our Lady of Sorrows (Q37285516) → Category:Interior of the Church of Our Lady of Sorrows (Horní Planá) (Q73397984) |
Planned use | some imports based on the category tree on Commons (for categories starting with "interior of") |
See also | P3722 (P3722) |
Motivation
editThere are probably >18000 such categories on Commons and many of them are now difficult to discover. At the same time, interiors are usually not notable enough to deserve an item. This would help Wikipedias and other users of Wikidata content to link to specific categories dedicated to multimedia which are taken inside buildings etc. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- And what about just using multiple values for Commons category with a proper qualifier (e.g. applies to part (P518))? --Mormegil (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Possible, although this might make life more complicated for p373>sitelink bots. Also, it would require that we lift some od the current constraints of P373 (single value, specification of allowed qualifiers).Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- If the “default” value would be preferred, the bots might even work correctly. Also, sure, one constraint would need to be modified (+separator (P4155)applies to part (P518)), but that is definitely a lesser change than a brand new property, isn’t it. --Mormegil (talk) 16:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Possible, although this might make life more complicated for p373>sitelink bots. Also, it would require that we lift some od the current constraints of P373 (single value, specification of allowed qualifiers).Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- What about applies to part (P518) = interior (Q2998430) as a qualifier? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC).
- Nomen ad hoc Possible but Commons category (P373)'s constraints currently don't allow multiple values (see above); also, it might break a few things. But it's definitely an option. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 11:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Oppose in the proposed form.The datatype of this property needs to be different - it should match topic's main category (P910) to link to a category item rather than just being a string. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2019 (UTC)- @Mike Peel: Interesting suggestion. I proposed string in order to match the datatype of Commons category (P373). Shouldn't it be the same? Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 11:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- You might want to see Wikidata:Properties_for_deletion#Property:P373. Using strings has the major disadvantage that if the Commons category is moved/deleted, they need to be manually/bot updated, while if you use the sitelinks in a category item then they are automatically updated. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support with the new datatype. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: Interesting suggestion. I proposed string in order to match the datatype of Commons category (P373). Shouldn't it be the same? Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 11:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Oppose proposed datatype. --- Jura 17:16, 30 October 2019 (UTC)given change of datatype --- Jura 16:27, 3 November 2019 (UTC)Oppose per Mike Peel. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 04:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Support --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 18:11, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
@Mike Peel, Jura1, Tinker Bell: Based on your suggestions, I have changed the datatype to "item" to match topic's main category (P910). If this was your major objection, would you now please reconsider your votes? Thanks for the feedback, Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 16:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose @Vojtěch Dostál, Mike Peel: See Wikidata:Notability David (talk) 16:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: Actually, Wikidata:Notability seems to allow this in 1.4 ("the item is used in a Commons-related statement, such as Property:P2033").Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 17:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Sound logically. Sikky (talk) 16:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Imo useful. Jedudedek (talk) 09:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Sikky, Mormegil, Nomen ad hoc, Mike Peel, Jedudedek: @Jura1, Vojtěch Dostál: Done: category for the interior of the item (P7561). − Pintoch (talk) 08:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC)