Wikidata:Property proposal/Seismic classification
Seismic classification edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
| Description | Seismic risk zone which the administrative entity that receives the seismic classification is in |
|---|---|
| Represents | for Italy e.g.: Seismic classification in Italy (Q2284185) (TODO: create generic item) |
| Data type | Item |
| Template parameter | "Zona sismica" in it:Template:Divisione amministrativa |
| Domain | places |
| Allowed values | elements which are instances of seismic classification |
| Example 1 | Rome (Q220) → 2A-3A-3B |
| Example 2 | Bari (Q3519) → 3 |
| Example 3 | Milan (Q490) → 3 |
| Example 4 | Reggio Calabria (Q8471) → 1 |
| Example 5 | Messina (Q13666) → 1 |
| Source | for Italian values: http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/attivita-rischi/rischio-sismico/attivita/classificazione-sismica |
| Planned use | Maybe it could used to sync datas with it.Wikipedia infoboxes or anyway check their consistency with the correct data |
| Robot and gadget jobs | There are open data on the Protezione Civile website, maybe we can import them |
| Applicable "stated in"-value | for Italy: Protezione Civile (Q206936) |
| Wikidata project | WikiProject Italy (Q6876022) |
Motivation edit
This data is present in every Italian commune article on it.Wikipedia and having it here on Wikidata would make import and checks easier. This is also a good addition for Wikidata itself. --Ferdi2005[Mail] 22:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Discussion edit
Support --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 22:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment The datatype should probably be "item", with items created for these various classification levels. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)- I agree with ArthurPSmith that the dataype should likely be item. Currently, we have JMA Seismic Intensity Scale (P5386). Should we focus this property on an Italian scale or make it more general that it can be used with different scales? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 23:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If this is not limited to Italy then I support it otherwise I oppose. For example here in Turkey we have official risk levels documented at https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/deprem-tehlike-haritasi?lang=en So the value constraints should be relaxed. Also as you can see they are defined by latitude and longitude boundaries so it should be allowed to be applied to a geographical area even if it is not an administrative entity. I am not an expert but if anyone is please see also Peak ground acceleration (Q1040321) and Peak ground velocity ShakeMaps derived from geodetic slip models (Q60699592) which may be relevant. If there is an array data type I suspect that should also be allowed, as apparently the risk here is no longer expressed as a single number as it used to be. Otherwise perhaps "quantity" data type as I see USA maps show peak ground accelerations probabilities e.g. https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/2018-long-term-national-seismic-hazard-map
- @Ferdi2005: what do you think of the proposed change of datatype? See hardiness zone (P8194) for a similar property with items as values. --- Jura 16:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jura1, ArthurPSmith, ChristianKl: Why not, let's change it to an item datatype and create item for national classification (If we follow this line, that values that I added before for Italy will become items, right?).--Ferdi2005[Mail] 20:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- So, which are the next steps? @Jura1, ArthurPSmith, ChristianKl: I've updated the property description.--Ferdi2005[Mail] 18:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Trade (talk) 10:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support, an important property for Italy.--Arbnos (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ferdi2005, ChristianKl, Jura1, Trade, Arbnos:
Done --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 22:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have created seismic classification (Q105725387), so all seismic classification items should be instances of that class. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 23:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
