Wikidata:Property proposal/Significant number
Significant number
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Not done
Description | significant number associated with the subject |
---|---|
Data type | String |
Domain | human (Q5) |
Example 1 | George Nelson (Q1507993) → 50 (object of statement has role (P3831): number of years active) |
Example 2 | Bert (Q584184) → 6 (object of statement has role (P3831): favorite number) |
Example 3 | Bluebeard (Q161138) → 7 (object of statement has role (P3831): number of spouses) |
See also | significant person (P3342), significant place (P7153) (etc.) |
Proposed by | Nomen ad hoc |
Nomen ad hoc (talk) 17:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC).
Discussion
edit- Support. Thierry Caro (talk) 20:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose There should be more precise properties in each case. --Infovarius (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Why? A larger property would be useful to avoid aving lots of small-scale properties with very few uses. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 20:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC).
- And what about similar properties? Should they be deleted and splitted, according to you? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 20:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC).
- Why? A larger property would be useful to avoid aving lots of small-scale properties with very few uses. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 20:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC).
- Oppose - "Significant event" and "significant people" identify specific events/people associated with the subject. I would expect "Significant number" to identify a number associated with the subject (as it does in the example of Bert and "6"). Using this for a mix of "significant number" and "quantity of some thing" is confusing. - PKM (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 01:34, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose To wide of a propery - Premeditated (talk) 09:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Marsupium (talk) 13:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Not done - consensus against the proposed property --DannyS712 (talk) 18:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)