Ghost.svg
Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, Premeditated!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

Thanks!Edit

Just wanted to say thanks for having a look at record label logos, much needed work👍 Moebeus (talk)

@Moebeus: Thanks, have so far added 136 images/logos for different record label (Q18127) located in the United States of America (Q30). Unfortunately there is a lot of manual work with template harvesting, and the logos/images are often wrongfully licensed on Wikimedia Commons (Q565). You are often well represented in the history of the different record labels. So I should thank you for setting a good example by always making well thought-out edits. Regards Premeditated (talk) 11:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

ThanksEdit

Thank you so much for welcome me. I want to help delete vandalism on Wikidata

Again Thanks. Have a wonderful day :) Seby1541 (talk) (contributions) 23:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

DescriptionsEdit

Hello Premediated,

I have seen, that you added descriptions. In German nouns are written with a capital letter so it is Gemälde not gemälde. Can you please try to correct. If you want I can help you correcting it. -- Hogü-456 (talk) 17:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

@Hogü-456: Whoops, my bad. A copy-past error. I will fix that in the script and on previously assigned values. Thanks for notifying me. - Premeditated (talk) 18:04, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Louise AbelEdit

god kveld! Bare et spørsmål? Hvorfor bruker du stated in (P248) Lokalhistorewiki som referanse for Norwegian historical register of persons ID (P4574). Lokalhistoriewiki.no ID (P6520) ligger forresten på linjen ovenfor. Jeg endrer til å leggen inn de to folketellingene hun er nevnt i og som har emner på wikidata. lokalhistoriewiki er jo ikke en del av historiskbefolkningsregister. Jeg endret akkurat fra kildefelt til referansefelt, så jeg viser til den engelske teksten for P248 to be used in the references field to refer to the information document or database in which a claim is made; for qualifiers use P805. Mvh Pmt (talk) 20:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

@Pmt: Hei, beklager sent svar. Grunnen til at jeg benyttet stated in (P248) Lokalhistorewiki som referanse er fordi jeg hentet linken til historiskbefolkningsregister derfra med et script. Mulig at Lokalhistorewiki igjen hentet det fra et annet sted. - Premeditated (talk) 11:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Takk for svar: Dette blir jo helt feil! Kan du vennligst forklare hvilket "skript" du har kjørt og og hvilke elementer det gjelder. Jeg ber deg tilbakestille dette med en gang. Det er ikke "mulig" at Lokalhistoriewiki henter data fra et annetsted. Sett deg inn i hva en identifikator er. Som jeg også nevnte ovenfor så ligger Lokalhistoriwiki-ID rett ovenfor i skjermbildet. Lokalhistoriewiki har absolutt ingen ting med Historisk befolkningsregister å gjøre enn at den på lik linje med wikidata henter en identifikatorverdi fra en annen database. Så lenge du ikke vet hva du holder på med så vennligst ikke gjør det. Jeg pinger også @Jeblad:. Mvh Pmt (talk) 14:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Lokalhistoriewiki er en av flere grupper som har vært involvert i dannelsen av Historisk befolkningsregister,[1] men jeg vet ikke om de har noen spesiell rolle. De dukker opp med en spesiell kildeoppføring på noen oppslag (se Henrik Ibsen (Q36661) histreg) uten at jeg kjenner til forskjellen. Sammenlign med oppførselen til Wikipedia under «Referanser».
Identifikatorene i elementer er egenreferanser, de finnes for en kilde som oppfattes som autorativ. Kun hvis de har en form som ikke er entydig og ikke kan følges så angis det en referanse. Historisk befolkningsregister fungerer som egenreferanse. Jeblad (talk) 17:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Høres ikke ut som det ble "helt feil". Men jeg kan sikkert fjerne de rundt 200 statement-ene som jeg opprettet etter Wikimania, om ønsket. - Premeditated (talk) 18:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Selvsagt er det ikke noe problem om Norwegian historical register of persons ID (P4574) hentes via Lokalhistoriewiki, Lokalhistoriewiki bruker jo sin identifikator fra Historisk befolkningsregister på samme måter som wikidata bruker sin identifikator fra Historisk befolkningsregister. Det som blir feil er å sette på "referanse" "nevnt i Lokalhistoriewiki". Det må taes bort. Og les gjerne litt og se på opprettelsesdiskusjoner og se litt på Lokalhistorie. Og igjen Identifikatorer på wikidata "oppfører" seg litt annerledes enn andre P-verdier. Og veldig positivt at ca 200 nye personer på wikidata/wikipedia har fått Histreg-ID. Mvh Pmt (talk) 18:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
@Pmt: Jeg kan bytte de ut med reference URL (P854), som da vil inneholde hele URL-en til lokalhistoriewiki-artikkelen. Er det en bedre løsning? - Premeditated (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Nei det vil jo gå i sirkel. Wikidata har en Historisk befolkningsregister-ID der ID - en er for f.eks Louise Abel (Q15916446) Se på Norwegian historical register of persons ID (P4574) og følg lenket pf01052055005372 og du havner på http://histreg.no/index.php/person/pf01052055005372 . Gå inn på https://lokalhistoriewiki.no/wiki/Louise_Abel klikk på lenken Louise Abel i Historisk befolkningsregister og du havner på http://histreg.no/index.php/person/pf01052055005372 . Du kan ikke referere på denne måten. Historisk befolkningregister ID er en sitat Identifikatorene i elementer er egenreferanser, de finnes for en kilde som oppfattes som autorati identifikator Ikke bland Identifikatorer med andre Properties/verdier på wikidata. Legg også merke til Lokalhistoriewiki.no ID (P6520) trykk på denne og du havner på https://lokalhistoriewiki.no/wiki/Louise_Abel. Og for å presisere det er IKKE lokalhistorie wiki som er referanse og basis til informasjon for Historisk befolkningsregister sin pfxxxxxxxx id for personer. Wikidata og Lokahistoriewiki henter samme ID fra historiskbefolkningsregisrer. Les også http://histreg.no/index.php/omhbr. Mvh Pmt (talk) 19:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Mix 'n' MatchEdit

God ettermiddag! Jeg lurer på om du kan hjelpe til med denne? Jeg har to filer som lister alle personene på Lokalhistoriewiki disse ønsker jeg å få koblet til Lokalhistoriewiki.no ID (P6520). Selv har jeg ingen kunnskap om hvordan jeg oppretter en Mix 'n' Match. Jeg får som regel Bruker Gerwoman til å opprette de for meg. Har du mulighet til å hjelpe? Mvh Pmt (talk) 16:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

God morgen! Det har jeg ikke gjort før, men vil gjerne prøve. - Premeditated (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
@Premeditated: God morgen igjen! Det høret kjempefint ut. Det jeg først kan gjøre er vel å vise deg en typisk Mix 'n' Match som jeg har fått laget for meg. Dette her https://tools.wmflabs.org/mix-n-match/#/catalog/2348 er en "katalog" der arkivverket har laget en CSV fil som så kan matches mot de norske personene på wikidata som da også ut i fra de to filene som jeg har fått i fra Lokalhistoriewiki og som jeg har sendt deg pr e-post. Mvh Pmt (talk) 08:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
@Premeditated: God kveld, har du fått anledning til å lese beskjeden min.Mvh Pmt (talk) 17:17, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Hei, har send deg en e-post om at jeg ikke fikk med noen filer i e-posten. - Premeditated (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

@Pmt: God ettermiddag! Jeg har i det siste fått lite tid til å jobbe med Wikimedia-prosjektene, og har derfor ikke fått sett så mye på den lista over personer som har tilknytting til NTNU-arkivet. Jeg kan fortsatt gjennomføre det, men det kan ta litt tid. Forøvrig finnes det nå en fungerende Mix'n'Match katalog for lokalhistoriewiki personer. - Premeditated (talk) 12:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

@Premeditated: Tusen takk, ingen hast fra min side. Ta deg den tiden du trenger, og takk for hjelpen så langt. Mvh Pmt (talk) 13:37, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

AliasEdit

Hello Premediated,

I have seen that you put some aliases of type: "Label (album)" or "Label by Performer". Can you explain its usefulness? If several albums have the same label, what is the use? And where can we find this procedure? --86.247.140.253 12:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Mixer game importEdit

Hi!

I just noticed the import of Mixer game ID (former scheme) (P7335) − that looks fantastic! Thanks for the work :)

I would have two questions: the edit summary mentions the Mixer Rust API ; but how do you do the matching to Wikidata items − is it name-matching, or through a third-identifier, or something else? And is the source-code available somewhere − others might get inspired from it :)

I will add a short note to Wikidata:WikiProject_Video_games/Log.

Jean-Fred (talk) 08:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

@Jean-Frédéric: Hello! I'm happy to help :)
  1. Most of the matching is based around name matching, but it's also passible to match with: The "Application User Model ID" from the Modern Store catalog, the KGL ID of the application in the known games list, Windows Store product id (aka big id) or the Xbox title ID. So, there are lots of possibilities.
  2. No, I haven't published any source-code. I have worked on making Wikidata:Pywikibot - Python 3 Tutorial more immersive, and using the service's API Reference should be a good start. - Premeditated (talk) 13:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Did you forgot to include expansion packs and downloadable content when you were name matching? I've noticed that you had matched all The Sims games but not their expansion packs. --Trade (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
I haven't matched any expansion packets. I can do that if you want. - Premeditated (talk) 15:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Dorotea kyrkeEdit

You merges the data you had created into Dorotea församling, which is not the same. I have undone you merge and instead merged it into Dorotea kyrka.Yger (talk) 10:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

@Yger: Sorry, thanks for letting me know and fixing the error. I was mislead by the image on sv:Dorotea församling. - Premeditated (talk) 10:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

HelpEdit

I have forgotten the password and email of my old Wikipedia account. What do I do?

Dineshswamiin (talk) 04:35, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

@Dineshswamiin: Hi, I know it's passable to use Special:PasswordReset, but since you don't remember the username it might be tricky. If you remember the e-mail you used it should be mentioned in e-mail from the Wiki. I hope this clarifies. - Premeditated (talk) 06:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi! I know username but I forgot email.

Help meEdit

I see you update 209 language(s) with the labels Monkhaen Kaenkoon, please you update 209 language(s) with the labels Jintara Poonlarp and Chalermpol Malakham?--บุญพฤทธิ์ ทวนทัย (talk) 08:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

  Done - Premeditated (talk) 10:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)


Q424378Edit

This is not exactly correct. If 'curacit' is a medication, it is not a chemical compound, but it contains chemical compound (and some excipients). Thus mapping relation type (P4390) close match (Q39893184). Wostr (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

@Wostr: True, the bot is working on w:keywords so when it is instance of (P31)medication (Q12140) and the word "legemiddel" (Norwegian for medication) is detected in the article. And full match on Label. That is considers an exact match. But I will make some adjustment to this specific case (of chemical compound). Thanks for making me aware of this. - Premeditated (talk) 14:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
EDIT Not by label, but alias. Related match would be best case. - Premeditated (talk) 14:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

HelloEdit

Hi, I’m taking you up on your offer of answers to Wikidata questions. I have been working on pages for two separate people on Wikidata, John Henry Hintermeister and his son Henry Hintermeister, both of whom painted as “Hy Hintermeister”. I’ve created an article for the two men on Wikipedia w:Hy Hintermeister, but cannot find a way to link both men’s Wikidata pages to that article. I created a second article w:John Henry Hintermeister to cover the father and to have a place to link his Wikidata page to. However, there is not likely going to be enough information to keep separate articles. Do you have an idea as to how to link the two identified people to a single article on Wikipedia? I’m including another editor who talked to me about the separate articles: @Charlesjsharp:. Any help would be appreciated, Jacqke (talk) 13:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

There should only be two articles - father and son, but only if they are both are sufficiently notable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Bot enters wrong exact match claims on anatomy items.Edit

Based on Google translate https://sml.snl.no/lumbalregionen appears to me like it describes a part of the spine and not the whole back of the abdomen lumbar region (Q25507913). lumbar vertebral column (Q66513438) feels like the more appropriate item. It seems especially dubious to claim an exact match for concepts that are not the same. Just because two anatomical concept have the same label doesn't mean that they are the same as most languages. ChristianKl❫ 09:03, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, @ChristianKl:. Thanks for notifying me. You are right this should not have been matched, I'm working on getting the bot only to do match "easy" items. On this item the SNL article mentation lumbar region (Q25507913), "lenderyggen", and sacrum (not an easy match, in other words). So, I will make some adjustments. - Premeditated (talk) 10:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

DLiveEdit

Hey, i remember the amazing work you did adding Mixer idenifiers to video games! I was wondering if you maybe could do the same with the DLive identifier? --Trade (talk) 02:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @Trade:. if I have time I will look into it. - Premeditated (talk) 12:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Pageterms changeEdit

Hey :)

I wanted to make sure you are aware of https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata/2020-July/014145.html


Cheers --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk) 19:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

@Lydia Pintscher (WMDE): That was new for me. Thanks for the information :). Regards Premeditated (talk) 20:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
You're welcome. If there is a place where we could have posted so you would have noticed it I'd love to hear it. --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

revertEdit

[2] - image was deleted from commons, and next I deleted WD entry to avoid broken images on wikis. Malarz pl (talk) 17:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

@Malarz pl: Whoops, my bad. I'm sorry. - Premeditated (talk) 17:47, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

WissenschaftEdit

The source you reverted says (via machine translation) "Vitenskap is systematic, methodical and critical examination, study or research. For example, we say that something is vitenskap if it follows certain criteria for good research."

The English Wikipedia article starts "Wissenschaft is the German language term for any study that involves systematic research. The term is sometimes roughly translated as science, although Wissenschaft is much broader and includes every systematic academic study of any area".

The source also names "humaniora" (humanities) as a form of vitenskap, and the humanities are included in Wissenschaft but excluded from the English-language conception of w:en:Science. I understand that this limited view of "science" surprises people who have grown up with the more comprehensive notion of knowledge.

In the end, those sound like the same subject to me, and I think the link is appropriate. (Please ping me.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi @WhatamIdoing:, thank you for reaching out to me. First of all I'm not at all in favour of machine translation for matching items. I'm a native Norwegian speaker, and finds the article on Great Norwegian Encyclopedia to be about science (Q336). Wissenschaft is certainly much broader then science because wissenschaft includes humanities disciplines like history, anthropology, literature studies, religious studies, translation studies and etc. Humanities tend to have a relativistic approach to knowledge (truth is always relative to context) whereas sciences tend to have a positivistic approach (absolute truth exists and can be discovered) that match the article about vitenskap. The article mention "humaniora" in a context that it's different from it. - Premeditated (talk) 20:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
I'd love to have your help in understanding the source better. I see one sentence that says "Man skjelner mellom" empirical science and formal sciences, followed by a sentence that says "Videre skjelner man mellom" natural science, humanities, and social science. Do I understand that this grammatical construction means, in the first sentence, that both named areas are science, and that the same words, in the second sentence, mean that only some of the three named areas are science?
Also, I notice that when you click through to their article about humanities, that it says at the top that it's "også kjent som:  humanistiske vitenskaper", which sounds relevant.
Through the 19th century, science in English included the humanities. One might talk about "the science of law" or "the science of beauty", for example. Limiting the term to the natural and applied sciences is a modern idea that not every country shares. Does Norwegian have a word for this broader concept of systematic scholarly study that includes the humanities as well as the sciences? WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
@WhatamIdoing: Sorry for late response. The article lack a specific explanation of all the branches of science. So, the text just try to introduce the top-level branches of science.
Humaniora is linked to humanities (Q80083). Here also combining multiple branches of science in one article.
Something correlating with human science (Q1587903) and/or hermeneutics (Q102686)? - Premeditated (talk) 12:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
If you take the first class about humanities at university, most of the class will be reading poems and plays written in ancient Greece. This is not science.
Hermeneutics is not considered any sort of science in English-speaking countries. It is mostly concerned with interpreting religious texts.
Human science#Meaning of 'science' comes with an explanation that says, in the end, "Human science isn't really science".
The source seems to indicate that all of these are "vitenskap". WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-39Edit

21:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-40Edit

21:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-41Edit

16:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-42Edit

15:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-43Edit

16:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-44Edit

17:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-45Edit

16:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-46Edit

15:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-47Edit

15:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-48Edit

17:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)