Wikidata:Property proposal/founded

has founded edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person

Not done

Description	hat gegründet (de) – (Please translate this into English.)
Data type	Item
Domain	mainly persons, companies, institutes
Allowed units	none
Example	has founded: William Booth (Q309882) -> The Salvation Army (Q188307)
Planned use	persons, who are founder of anything, need the property "has founded" or similar. There are so much persons in Wikidata, who are founder or co-founder of anything, but I could not find any similar property
Robot and gadget jobs	not yet
See also	Wikidata:Property_proposal/Archive/21#Founder_of (Dec 2013) Wikidata:Property_proposal/Archive/46#founder_of (Feb 2016) Wikidata:Property_proposal/Archive/45#founder_of_.28alias:_founded.29 (March 2016)

Motivation

persons, who are founder or co-founder of anything, need the property "has founded" or similar. There are so much persons in Wikidata, who are founder of anything, but I could not find any similar property Doc Taxon (talk) 15:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Oppose this would be an inverse property to founded by (P112); it really should not be needed. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per APS. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- but an inverse property is not been shown as property of the item, because if I open the item William Booth (Q309882) I cannot found the object The Salvation Army (Q188307), an object of relevance, founded by the item. Doc Taxon (talk) 17:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the above. If you want to find these founded things, then run the appropriate query:

SELECT ?item ?itemLabel 
{
	?item wdt:P112 wd:Q309882 .
	SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "de,en"  }    
}
LIMIT 1000

Try it!

. (Incidentally, the pairing you mentioned is not present in Wikidata at all.) Mahir256 (talk) 03:02, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as the sample isn't even present in Wikidata to other way round.
--- Jura 06:53, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
oh sorry, but now: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q188307&oldid=532670914 Doc Taxon (talk) 20:40, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Unneeded inverse. --Yair rand (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc Taxon: Not done, as the proposal has no support and broad opposition. ChristianKl (talk) 11:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]