Wikidata:Property proposal/key col of

key col of

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Place

Not done

Description	mountain, of which the respective col is the key col
Represents	key col (Q29438920)
Data type	Item
Example 1	Great St Bernard Pass (Q623424) → Dufourspitze (Q3403)
Example 2	Reschen Pass (Q222860) → Wildspitze (Q679277)
Example 3	Passo di Fraele (Q2056143) → Ortler (Q650695)
Source	Peakbagger: Key col

Motivation

Proposed property is one of the main characteristic parameters of any col on earth. Since the assignment of a peak to its key col is bijective, for any peak an analogue property is recommended. Greets, Arjoopy (talk) 16:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Oppose: no need of a reverse property. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 17:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Any reason for this opinion? --Arjoopy (talk) 16:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's not for me to justify such property... I just find it redundant with "key col". Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Maybe we misunderstood. "key col" is a property for peaks to indicate their key col; "key col of" is a property for cols to indicate the peak of which it is the key col. It's pretty much the same thing as with "father" and "child", there are also both properties in use. Best Regards, Arjoopy (talk) 09:08, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support David (talk) 15:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course! --Elop (talk) 09:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for principal reasons. As long as relations are not considered to be first class citizens and are not maintained automatically by the software. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Unnecessary inverse of key col (P7479). --Yair rand (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Arjoopy, Nomen ad hoc, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Elop, Herzi Pinki, Yair rand: Not done. Thierry Caro (talk) 05:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]