Wikidata:Property proposal/nighttime view

nighttime view edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Sister projects

Done: nighttime view (P3451) (Talk and documentation)

Description	image of the subject at night, or at least in twilight
Data type	Commons media file
Domain	any
Allowed values	Commons media with corresponding images
Example	Ponce de Leon Inlet Light (Q3396139) → File:Ponce Inlet Lighthouse at night - panoramio.jpg

Ponce de Leon Inlet Light (Q3396139)

Notified participants of WikiProject Lighthouses

Motivation

Somehow this seems the more logical view for lighthouses, even though P18 generally holds a daytime view. It might be useful beyond WikiProject Lighthouses
--- Jura 11:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

~~Oppose~~ Support it obviously.
--- Jura 11:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- You are the proponent. You've been told multiple times, by me and others, that you shouldn't vote in support of your own proposals. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Please convert your claim to a statement by adding a reference. Otherwise it's likely to be ignored or removed.
  --- Jura 10:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Use the existing image property, with a qualifier. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I second Andy's view. There are limitless versions that could have their own properties, but working with one and a qualifier seems to be the more correct way. – Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 09:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Susannaanas: There is a view shared by some that P18 should have only one value. It currently has a single value contraint.
--- Jura 09:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I would rather change that. Could you point to the discussion? – Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 10:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Property talk:P18. --- Jura 10:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Susannaanas: ok for you?
    --- Jura 23:52, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Weak support I'll be ok with having it (for now). I think the question about multiple images will have to be tackled sooner or later. – Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 07:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Removing the single value constraint with P18 seems worse: we might get too many images then. Lymantria (talk) 10:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support although I wonder if instead of ending up with too many image (P18)s we're just going to end up with too many image properties like this? Still this one seems useful. ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jura1, Pigsonthewing, Susannaanas, Lymantria, ArthurPSmith: Done --Fralambert (talk) 17:53, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]