Wikidata:Property proposal/obituary of

Withdrawn

Description	subject of the obit
Represents	obituary (Q309481)
Data type	Item
Domain	human (Q5)
Example 1	Necrology, Glenn Ansel Fry (Q57486921) → Glenn A. Fry (Q57483816)
Example 2	Edward Fawcett. 1867-1942 (Q47476898) → Edward Fawcett (Q21166061)
Example 3	Zoulim (Clarisse) (Q66124539) → Clarisse Zoulim (Q46996106)
See also	review of (P6977), main subject (P921) (main property)
Proposed by	Nomen ad hoc

Support --Trade (talk) 17:10, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support David (talk) 07:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment personally, I prefer the approach outlined at Talk:Q309481. --- Jura 08:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Use main subject (P921). ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose instance of (P31) = obituary (Q309481) or genre (P136) = obituary (Q309481), and main subject (P921) = Qxxxx. Jheald (talk) 20:29, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, Jura1, ArthurPSmith and Jheald. But what about review items? Isn't review of (P6977) redundant with genre (P136) review (Q265158) too? Thanks in advance for your explanations, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Jheald was opposed to review of (P6977) and I didn't comment on the proposal. Nevertheless, the proposers gave some coherent arguments there about how main subject wasn't appropriate. I think the case for the sufficiency of "main subject" is much clearer here. ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't support that either, but for that I haven't really edited 1000s of items to a different format. --- Jura 22:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for prompt responses. Let's give it up. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 22:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]