Wikidata:Property proposal/subscribed by

Not done

Description	institutions that subscribed a specific resource
Data type	Item
Domain	websites, databases, etc.
Example 1	ACM Digital Library (Q42805116) → FH Joanneum (Q1388308), Institute of Science and Technology Austria (Q1665176), ... (405 values omitted), Nokia (Q1418), Nutanix (Q16959629)
Example 2	Credo Reference (Q212517) → (for example) Columbia University (Q49088), New York University (Q49210)
Example 3	Oxford Bibliographies Online (Q32217010) → (for example) Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library (Q16463359)
See also	point in time (P585), start time (P580), end time (P582), applies to part (P518)

(Add your motivation for this property here.) GZWDer (talk) 08:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support maybe a candidate for a en:Wikibase installation – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Salgo60 (talk • contribs) at 09:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC).
Oppose to a property that would add 405 values. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: generally too many. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]
I think the inverse might make sense Germartin1 (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are (tens of?) thousands of institutions that might subscribe to one of these resources. How many such resources do we anticipate having? If it's less than a hundred or so then the inverse may make sense. Otherwise I think you'd need a special item for each subscription - which does suggest putting it into its own wikibase instance. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How about "unsubscribed by"? Seems to be more important. --- Jura 09:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done no consensus to create --DannyS712 (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]