Wikidata:Property proposal/xHamster ID

xHamster performer ID

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person

Done: xHamster pornstar ID (P8720) (Talk and documentation)

Description	identifier for a porn performer in the database of the xHamster website
Represents	xHamster (Q16617922)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	human (Q5)
Example	NSFW: Piper Perri (Q27119500) → piper-perri Jan Velička (Q24034732) → denis-reed Teanna Trump (Q19842219) → teanna-trump
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Mix'n'match	3901
Formatter URL	https://xhamster.com/pornstars/$1

Motivation

This new Wikidata property related to erotica or pornography (Q53671196) would enhance our coverage of pornographic actor (Q488111). Thierry Caro (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

@Trade, Crazy hat royal, AntisocialRyan, ImprovedWikiImprovment: It may or may not be of interest to you. Thierry Caro (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This one is good too. AntisocialRyan (talk) 18:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Trade (talk) 18:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lockal (talk) 10:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Crazy hat royal (talk) 16:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment@Thierry Caro: Any plans of making Mix'n'Match catalog? --Trade (talk) 11:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Trade: I can do it at some point later. So you can feel free if you wanna go for it now. It would be great. Thierry Caro (talk) 12:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Do you have an easy to understand guide? @Thierry Caro:--Trade (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Trade: Done. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - @Thierry Caro: Are the ID's created by users or by the xHamster staff? A lot of the entries are of somewhat low quality--Trade (talk) 23:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        I honestly do not know. Thierry Caro (talk) 00:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        I think it would be for the best if entries not containing any videos of the subject to be marked as N.A.. Does that sound fair? I know some users were against matching Pornhub entries with non-adult actors. We should get that sorted out before this identifier gets created. @Thierry Caro: --Trade (talk) 09:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        
        Also: @Robin van der Vliet, ChristianSW: becuase of their previous votes.--Trade (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        I think of celebrities having unsollicited entries on such websites as people having bad press coverage. And I believe it is part of our job to link to content about people regardless of whether or not it is positive or negative for them, from a PR perspective. Sadly enough, porn sites are sometimes the most 'negative' thing you'll get in an external ID section that should technically offer multiple conflicting points of view about the given individual, but is most of the time entirely hagiographic. Thierry Caro (talk) 12:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        I said that ID's should be marked as N.A if theyi don't contain any footage depicting theb subject@Thierry Caro:--Trade (talk) 19:06, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Baidax (talk) 23:20, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Thierry Caro, Trade, Crazy hat royal, AntisocialRyan, Lockal, Baidax:

Done xHamster pornstar ID (P8720) Pamputt (talk) 22:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]