Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/12/18
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Q109551190: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. — Haseeb (talk) 14:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Item’s creator is notified. If no serious sources will be given, then after seven days the item will be deleted. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:48, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:00, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Q115748656: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Created by mistake Sabelöga (talk) 23:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Q113959605: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Apparent self-promotional item that has since been blanked by its creator --Quesotiotyo (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Q107976086: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Appears to have only been used for test edits --Quesotiotyo (talk) 05:16, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Bulk deletion request
- Q115632816 (delete | history | links | logs)
- Q115632824 (delete | history | links | logs)
- Q115632831 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
self-promotional content Quesotiotyo (talk) 06:54, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Q115570227: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Lectrician1 (talk) 03:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- is 200k insta followers enough? BrokenSegue (talk) 19:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Question: Is followers or influence alone sufficient for notability? I saw you just deleted a well-known influencer with many articles covering him and who often makes videos with Jason Derulo, King Bach and Lizzo to name a few, with over 5M followers, 1 Billion views and over 100M likes for lacking notability.
- When a wikidata page is deleted is it because a subject is not notable itself or because the page lacks notability due to insufficient attribution sources? Ty Mateobala (talk) 05:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- technically the letter of our rules do not allow follower counts alone to be sufficient. but if someone has a lot of followers it's likely they are notable for other reasons. what item was deleted that you are talking about? BrokenSegue (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ty for the quick response. The page was Q115206576, TheBlondeJon, a tiktok influencer.
- It appears as it was not deleted directly and it was deleted from the linked relationship via sibling identifier of the "JetSet" wikidata. (I have asked the other admin bolvb to further look into the abuse of the wikidata and wikipedias for "JetSet".)Regarding Q115206576, I'm assuming the abuse of his siblings wikidata influenced this decision. And I also assuming his wikidata must have had insufficient references to qualify for a non-notable deletion as surely 1 Billion views and 100M+ likes surely would put him in the top 1%-15% of wikidata pages in terms of notability, correct?
- If this is the case, may I ask that you restore the page and allow me to find and add appropriate references?
- Ty! Mateobala (talk) 13:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- @BrokenSegue Forgot to tag you, so bumping this. Mateobala (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- @ Mateobala: I'm having trouble finding reputable sources discussing this guy. If you want to continue this discussion find a few sources about them and message me on my talk page. BrokenSegue (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds good. Thanks Mateobala (talk) 00:31, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- @ Mateobala: I'm having trouble finding reputable sources discussing this guy. If you want to continue this discussion find a few sources about them and message me on my talk page. BrokenSegue (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- @BrokenSegue Forgot to tag you, so bumping this. Mateobala (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- technically the letter of our rules do not allow follower counts alone to be sufficient. but if someone has a lot of followers it's likely they are notable for other reasons. what item was deleted that you are talking about? BrokenSegue (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Item’s creator is notified. If no serious sources will be given, then after seven days the item will be deleted.--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Hector Gabriel Corrale de Matos (Q115383440): Wikimedian in residence at Wiki Movimento Brasil (WMB): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Gymnicus (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)- Hello! Thank you for point it out.
- Hector is a wikimedian in residence in Brazil. Having his item is also important for helping us to map the brazilian wikimedian community.
- Therefore, her item fulfills a structural need. So I ask for the item not to be deleted. ACheJu (talk) 13:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Not deleted Not notable as a Wikimedian per se, but the Lattes Platform number (P1007) identifier and its contents seems to make the item notable per WD:N #2 and/or #3. --Emu (talk) 16:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Priscila Carvalho Cruz (Q115383752): Wikimedian in residence at Wiki Movimento Brasil (WMB): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Gymnicus (talk) 17:51, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! Thank you for point it out.
- Priscila is a wikimedian in residence in Brazil. She is also an author of several papers (like this one - Q115690030). It is also important for helping us to map the brazilian wikimedian community.
- Therefore, her item fulfills a structural need. So I ask for the item not to be deleted. ACheJu (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wikimedian in residence I don't think is enough but I might be convinced by the paper. BrokenSegue (talk) 05:05, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not deleted per BrokenSegue --Emu (talk) 16:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wikimedian in residence I don't think is enough but I might be convinced by the paper. BrokenSegue (talk) 05:05, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Q110236080: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No sources, sitelinks, identifiers, incoming links, or descriptions...the label and statements alone are not enough to positively identify this person (one of several such items created by @Le singe du grand'garde) --Quesotiotyo (talk) 03:40, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Matthias Gäumann (Q109314982): French engineer and academic: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Suite à la non-recevabilité de l’article « Matthias Gäumann » sur Wikipédia, je vous prie de supprimer la page https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q109314982 de votre base de connaissances dans les meilleurs délais. --Laure Sonata (talk) 09:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- As Vice President of the École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, he should be relevant. --Gymnicus (talk) 18:45, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not deleted per Gymnicus. --Emu (talk) 16:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Edit group QSv2T/1671032405441
Error. Already exist here : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q113652701. Bordurie (talk) 15:43, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
invalid ID (L766): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
It does not look like this method of modeling has caught on - this lexeme does not provide anything which cannot be found on a Breton lexeme gor this pattern عُثمان (talk) 17:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Nicolás Atanes (Q106452636): Spanish mathematical activist (born 2004): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Promotion and not notability criteria meet. Before there was an cawiki article, but it was deleted several times for selfpromotion KajenCAT (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- The given URL's, in which Nicolás Atanes is described, should be enough for natability here in Wikidata.
Keep --Gymnicus (talk) 08:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC) - Not done Already decided (Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/10/10#Q106452636), no new points raised. Also two sitelinks. --Emu (talk) 16:52, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Alphonse Nahuijs (Q115756249): Dutch translator of "Max Havelaar" in English (1840-1890): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Double with Q86775148, sorry! Dick Bos (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Emu, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Q115739047: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unrequired, confusing item from a database just imported by me Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 17:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Q115757245: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Blank entry, accidently added --81.5.255.190 18:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)