Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/12/27

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q96048254

Q96048254: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

All sitelinks deleted. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Dexbot (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 02:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: The SOMA (Q109582568) entities

User:Callum.jae Imported a robotics ontology into Wikidata called SOMA (Q109582568). These items are not notable and we should not allow Wikidata to become a place where you can document your ontology. If you want to link your entities, use equivalent class (P1709).

Items to delete: https://w.wiki/63sb Lectrician1 (talk) 03:51, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

While I agree these should be linked and not new items (for the most part at least) - I don't see anything on the talk page for User:Callum.jae, have you raised this with this user elsewhere? ArthurPSmith (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
I mentioned their username here so they should have got a notification about this deletion request... I have not brought it up elsewhere. Lectrician1 (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

see discussion right above Estopedist1 (talk) 09:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

@ArthurPSmith@Lectrician1 should we ask any help to determine the value of these SOMA items. Or it is a clear mass-deletion? Estopedist1 (talk) 07:05, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

@Estopedist1 Clear mass deletion IMO. Imagine if we created items for every single linked ontology class or every single individual external identifier. That'd be crazy. Lectrician1 (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Some of them could be merged with existing wikidata items; however merging might not be the right thing to do here. For example Q109708904 and physical state (Q230855) or Q109583897 and physical object (Q223557) would intermingle wikidata items with the various linked SOMA items. Although some of that has already happened - see pushing (Q69396773) for example. How do we best clean this up? Mass deletion would also delete those statements on other wikidata items, or not? ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

From what I've seen, these entities are only linked to other SOMA entities so we wouldn't be effecting our own ontology in any way if we delete them all. Lectrician1 (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

all deleted Estopedist1 (talk) 07:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q19224479

Q19224479: 1898 poem written by Rainer Maria Rilke: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Dopplung zu Q19238835, ursprünglich war das bei de.wikisource eine andere Ausgabe, die wurde aber gelöscht. Mapmarks (talk) 02:36, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

@Mapmarks is the merging with Q19238835 suitable solution? Estopedist1 (talk) 05:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

yes that is ok, thank you :) --Mapmarks (talk) 17:38, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Not deleted, but redirected Estopedist1 (talk) 07:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q115804292

Q115804292: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Out of scope? Trade (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Wd-Ryan (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q115683868

Q115683868: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Out of scope? Trade (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q114877205

Q114877205: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax? Trade (talk) 02:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Wd-Ryan (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q115555240

Q115555240: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Out of scope? Trade (talk) 02:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Wd-Ryan (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q115448931

Q115448931: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Out of scope? Trade (talk) 02:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Delete No notability shown, and the query's only sitelink has since been removed. ronintalk 02:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Wd-Ryan (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q115239219

Q115239219: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Out of scope? Trade (talk) 02:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Wd-Ryan (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q115869987

Dennis Walczak (Q115869987): German local politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Article in German Wikipedia was deleted because of no relevance; no article in another Wikipedia --Nordprinz (talk) 03:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Not deleted Added the bare minimum of media coverage to meet WD:N --Emu (talk) 09:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q115748780

Q115748780: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test Madamebiblio (talk) 03:40, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Item’s creator is notified. If no serious sources will be given, then after seven days the item will be deleted. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q59342153

Q59342153: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable; single incoming link is unsourced --Quesotiotyo (talk) 06:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Item’s creator is notified. If no serious sources will be given, then after seven days the item will be deleted. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:00, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Q68301592

Q68301592: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems spam Egon Willighagen (talk) 14:51, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

@Egon Willighagen I am using procedural oppose here: id est all creations by this anonym (see [1]) should be watched together, not to single out only one item Estopedist1 (talk) 07:55, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

yes, of course they should all be looked into. Looking forward to hearing the outcome of the question of these substances are notable. --Egon Willighagen (talk) 08:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Not done Let's discuss all of them together at Wikidata:Requests for deletions#Bulk deletion request: Covestro trademarks --Ameisenigel (talk) 13:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)