Wikidata

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Antoine2711bot

< Wikidata:Requests for permissions‎ | Bot

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

 Approved --Lymantria (talk) 06:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


antoine2711bot edit

antoine2711bot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

Operator: Antoine2711 (talk • contribs • logs)

Task/s: This robot will add data in the context of Digital discoverability project of the RDIFQ (Q62382524).

Code: It's work done with OpenRefine, maybe a bit of QuickStatement, and maybe some API calls from Google Sheet.

Function details: Tranfer data for 280 movies from an association of distributors.

--Antoine2711 (talk) 04:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Antoine2711: Is your request still supposed to be active? Do you have test-/exmple-edits? Lymantria (talk) 07:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Lymantria: No, it's mainly batch operations that I do myself. There is nothing automated yet, and there won't be for the project I've been working in the last 9 months. --Antoine2711 (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Lymantria, Jura: The data I added all comes from a clean data set provided by distributors. I tried to do my best, but I might not have done everything perfectly. Someone spooted an empty item, and I added the missing data. If there are any other, I will do the same corrections.

My request for the bot is still pertinent as I will do other additions. What information do I need to provide for my bot request? --Antoine2711 (talk) 16:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jura1: Sorry for not responding earlier. Theses people are team members on a movie, and I needed to create a statement with {{P]3092}} and also a quantifier, object has role (P3831), and in the case of Ronald Fahm (Q65116570), he's a hairdresser (Q55187). Ideally, I should be able to also push that in the Dxx, the description of this person. But I must be careful. I created around 1500 persons, and I might have 200 still not connected. Do you see anything else? --Antoine2711 (talk) 03:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yesterday I looked into this request again and noticed that the problems I had identified 5 months ago were still not fixed. If you need help finding all of them, I could do so. --- Jura 08:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jura1: yes, anything you see that I didn't do well, tell me, and I'll correct it. If I create 500 items, and if I just do 1 % of errors, it's still 5 bad item creation. So even if I'm careful, I'm still learning and doing mistake. I try to correct them as fast as I can, and if you can help me pin-point problems, I'm fix them, like I did with everyone here. If you have SparQL queries (or other way of find lots of data) let me know and don't hesitate to share with me. Regards, Antoine --Antoine2711 (talk) 06:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Peter James: I think that most of theses are now linked. For a few hundred, I still need to put the occupation. I also think that I'm going to state, for the ones with few information, the movies in which they worked. Might help to identify those persons. I've also created links to given name and surname, but that doesn't help much for identification. Note that I added alot of IMDB ID, and those are excellent. Do you have suggestion for me? Regards, Antoine --Antoine2711 (talk) 04:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cleanup seems to be ongoing. --- Jura 09:36, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know that alphabet latin (Latin alphabet (Q41670)) and alphabet latin (Latin script (Q8229)) where actually 2 different things. Thank you for pointing that out. --Antoine2711 (talk) 04:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks for pointing that out. I'm also cleaning that up. --Antoine2711 (talk) 04:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Antoine2711: you seem to be running an unauthorized bot that is doing weird edits. Please explain. Multichill (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Multichill: Hi, yes, I did see those errors. I was cleaning that yesterday, and will continue today. This was a edit batch with 3% of mistake, on a 3000 lot. Even if 3% is not a lot, in those quantities, I must be very careful. Unfortunately I'm still learning. Please note that nothing this bot do is not supervised and launched by a human decision (which may be unperfect…). Regards, Antoine --Antoine2711 (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Not done}} @Antoine2711: This request seems to be abandoned, please reopen it if that is not the case. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Peel: No, I haven't abondoned it, I've answered all questions, and I'll still pushing more and more with OpenRefine on Wikidata. I would like this to go thru. Antoine2711 (talk) 23:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Antoine2711: Thanks, I've re-opened it accordingly. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Peel : what should I do? I used OpenRefine with this account for the last 3 years or so. Would you like me to do another test with a fresh dataset? By nature of my work, my datasets are most always differents. Regards, Antoine Antoine2711 (talk) 04:22, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think you need to hear more from @Lymantria, Jura1: and co, maybe also @Ymblanter:. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think a fresh test run would be fine to do. Lymantria (talk) 10:45, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Lymantria, what dataset should I choose? Quantity, type, etc. Regards, Antoine2711 (talk) 18:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What would you suggest as a challenging dataset? That one. Lymantria (talk) 20:18, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lymantria
https://iw.toolforge.org/editgroups/b/OR/a8ffca79d4f
https://iw.toolforge.org/editgroups/b/OR/26977e307cb
https://iw.toolforge.org/editgroups/b/OR/1816bb9c7ef
https://iw.toolforge.org/editgroups/b/OR/959b098cc33
https://iw.toolforge.org/editgroups/b/OR/97a2aab0807
Far from perfect, I still have enrichment to do, but good first shoot.
Regards, Antoine Antoine2711 (talk) 05:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Peel: does this seams a good dataset/example of my work? Is it good? This is a dataset I'll work for 2 or 3 months. The data provider is Musée de la civilisation (Q1705530). I might even get pictures for WikiCommons if I'm lucky. Regards, Antoine2711 (talk) 05:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: What should I do more? Regards, Antoine2711 (talk) 20:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Peel, Lymantria, Ymblanter: it's been more than 2 weeks since I did my last test. Is there more to do? Regards, Antoine2711 (talk) 02:36, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, waiting for more reactions. Ymblanter (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was pointed out by @Lymantria: that my silence here could be interpreted as non-consent. That definitely isn't the case, I was just trying to neutrally move things along. I've looked through some of the test run edits, and they look fine to me. I'm not sure this actually needs a bot account - I think these edits could be made with Antoine's main account - but I don't think it hurts either. So to avoid any confusion, I  Support this request. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I will approve the request in a couple of days, provided that no objections will be raised. Lymantria (talk) 05:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Bot/Antoine2711bot&oldid=1653342750"