Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/ElphiBot 2
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Not approved. There are concerns about the bot operators ability to fix problems in their code if the event arises, as well as the fact that the bot operator has not responded to questions on this request in the past 2+ weeks. Since the original approval was revoked, this bot is not approved to operate. Legoktm (talk) 18:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Flag removed. Vogone talk 19:24, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not approved. There are concerns about the bot operators ability to fix problems in their code if the event arises, as well as the fact that the bot operator has not responded to questions on this request in the past 2+ weeks. Since the original approval was revoked, this bot is not approved to operate. Legoktm (talk) 18:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
ElphiBot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Elph (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s:I want to run this bot. you can find details of this bot on the same page.
- The problem of making edits on user namespace was solved.
- I want to run the bot just on articles (ns:0)
Function details: --عباس ☢ 19:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC) [reply]
- Question when creating new article, your bot does not include all links at the page. For example, in Q8000036, Your bot includes only el: link, while the summary says that you are importing from ruwiki. Do you fix this problem? -- ChongDae (talk) 09:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Until this bug is unsolved i'll run the bot just on articles.--عباس ☢ 20:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- IIRC, this happened regardless of the namespace, and in considering I do remember correctly, that means it should not be approved. — Hazard-SJ ✈ 23:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Until this bug is unsolved i'll run the bot just on articles.--عباس ☢ 20:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose for two main reasons:1-He doesn't feel responsible about bugs of codes he running case in point he didn't answer the user until (s)he asked him in this page, 2-He is not familiar with PWB framework and python language. he couldn't debug this simple bug himself and asked Reza to debug. The API of WD is changing. this changes are causing bugs sometimes and if a bot operator can't debug these so why he or she is running codes?Amir (talk) 11:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'd like to see a response to Amir's comment, otherwise I'll close this as not approved shortly. Legoktm (talk) 02:48, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]