User talk:Ladsgroup

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Ladsgroup/Archive 8 on 2015-09-02.

درود بر شما. گویا دکمهٔ خنثی‌سازی حذف شده :؟ من چنین گزینه‌ای دیگر نمی‌بینم. نه در فارسی و نه در انگلیسی. چه‌طور ممکن است؟

در کدام ویکی؟

همین ویکی‌داده.

نه. من مشکلی در دیدنش ندارم.

درود مدیر گرامی. این ویرایش نیازمند حذف است.

ممنون انجام شد!

درود بر تدبرتان.

این

و این هم

درود از دقت شما. این هم انجام شد.

این و این خلاصه ویرایش.

مثل ویکی‌پدیا تام دارد این‌جا؟ که مزاحم شما نشوم دائم.

ممنون. جفتشان را پنهان کردم. تام هست ولی کسی فارسی نمی‌داند برای همین ترتیب اثر نخواهند داد.

1

1

این آی‌پی هم خراب‌کاری کرده. راهی جز خنثی‌سازی تک‌به‌تک بلد نیستم اما زیاد است و تاریخچه را به هم می‌ریزد

1 2

1 2

1 فاقد سرشناسی.

Q61772103 فاقد سرشناسی

special:diff/893127312

• special:diff/922809673
• special:diff/918438001

اولی عمداً حذف نشد؟

شرمنده. مشکل این بود که ریورت نشده بود.

• special:diff/988244981
• special:diff/984055240
• special:diff/975437058
• special:diff/972304495
• Q65006554 (سرشناسی)
• Q65548656 (سرشناسی)
• Special:Contributions/Mobin241(خراب‌کاری گسترده)

همگی انجام شد

Hi, I see that the report linked on Wikidata:WikiProject LGBT for Happy pride is a bit out of date, could you please run DexBot to update it ?

Hey, I got the new results from PetScan which is more useful IMO since you can just re-run it.

Still the updated version is in User:Ladsgroup/Happy Pride Month

Hi, could you please run DexBot over English Wikipedia and import badges (GA, FA, ...)? We had an incident with a malfunctioning bot and many of them were removed. Thanks.

Running

It seems down. Is there any problem?

TLDR: I'm stupid.

Long version: I was going away for dinner and closed the laptop causing it to stop.

It should have been done now.

Thank you very much!

Hi, Q1667868 (Xenokles Painter), you have created by Bot, already was there: Q1667868 (Xenokles Maler). Such thins happen, when people without the least knowledge do such things, jut in order to do mass than class work. And he was not a potter, but a vase painter. Doubly entry, major mistakes. Frustrating.

Hi Ladsgroup - is EasyQuery yours?

If so, you may want to know that it produces erroneous SPARQL if used on Q1763539#P1236 ...

And I should also say, if EasyQuery is yours - thanks a million. It's very useful indeed :)

Hey, I made a change Special:Diff/931289459 I hope it fixes issues. let me know if it works.

Excellent; thank you Ladsgroup. That works very well indeed :)

Hello,

After using the Kian Game in the Wikidata Distributed Game (https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-game/distributed/#game=15) I found the following major bug: the game ignores preexisting instance of statements, sometimes even adding an exact duplicate (see, for example, https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q20501861&diff=prev&oldid=907940290).

I hope this is fixed soon, since otherwise it seems to be a good tool.

I think I fixed the tool now. Keep me posted.

Unfortunately, this still seems to happen:

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q20502600&diff=924141146&oldid=720025429

I fixed most things now except the part for P31:Q5 because number of items having this statement is so large that I can't make the query to work...

I will work on it later.

Dexbot did this way back in 2015, and it wasn't caught until now, but for some bizarre reason it added "health specialty: gastroenterology" to cherubism (Q568865), with no references. Cherubism is a genetic disorder of the facial bones, and has absolutely nothing to do with the digestive system. This error, which was showing up on the Wikipedia article, has now been manually removed from Q568865, and since it happened way back in 2015, perhaps whatever caused it has already been fixed, but since I see multiple recent posts about the bot adding strange inaccurate data, I thought I should mention this one too.

I believe this is a question for User:Doc James who asked me to run the bot.

So the bot was based on ICD 10 (or were they ICD 9 code). The ICD codes are group by topic area and as jaw pertains to part of the GI track I guess they listed it there. I have been reviewing these lately and finding that well this method was decent it was not perfect unfortunately.

Ah, okay — thanks. Glad it wasn't a case of a bot running wild. 🙂

Back in April 2013, DexBot added the Commons category "World War I recruitment posters" to military recruitment (Q451987) starting the conflation of the concept of "military recruitment" with "military recruitment posters" that has continued since. Not really anything for you to do to fix this now, but I wanted it recorded. JesseW (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, I'm not running the bot anymore.

Hello Ladsgroup,

The user who created the articles in multiple languages for the band Ha*Ash, also added some badges to its wikidata item Q5494459. Deltabot removed the badge for enwiki 4 times, and I removed the badges for eswiki and ptwiki because I couldn't find any trace that the articles really have been granted the 'featured' or 'good' status on those projects. However, Dexbot readded the 'good article' badge for ptwiki. Do you have any idea why, or based on which information?

I'll also leave a message to our pt-colleagues on pt:Wikipédia Discussão:Artigos bons#Ha*Ash.

With kind regards, Mar(c).

Hey,

It's because the article in ptwiki is actually marked as a good article. Maybe it didn't follow the process and someone just added the template but it's in the category: https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Categoria:!Artigos_bons&pagefrom=Escola+de+Treino+de+Voo+Elementar+N.%C2%BA+1+da+RAAF#mw-pages

The bot works based on the given category.

Thanks for the explanation. Last week I noticed the categorization but I couldn't find the source of it. pt:User:JMagalhães confirmed that it's actually not a good article. The article source text doesn't contain [Categoria:!Artigos bons] or {artigo bom}, so I think the categorization is based on wikidata, via some module (probably pt:Módulo:Categorização AD e AB de outras wikis, and the category wasn't updated after I removed the badge. I'll try again and check the category.

With kind regards, Mar(c).

Yes, removing the badge removed the article from the category: it wasn't shown at the bottom of pt:Ha*Ash anymore. A null-edit to the article was needed to reflect the change in the caterory namespace (https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Categoria:!Artigos_bons&pagefrom=H).