◄◄ User talk:Jon Harald Søby
Archives: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26



Wikidata weekly summary #453Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #454Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #455Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #456Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #457Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #458Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #459Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #460Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #461Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #462Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #463Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #464Edit

Nyhetsbrev nr. 20 fra Wikimedia NorgeEdit

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 14:40, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

LexemeEdit

Du adderar många lexem(er). Ser du någon nytta av det? Är det någon som har glädje av det redan i dag, eller om ett år, eller när? Jag vet att detta är tänkt att användas för abstract Wikipedia, men det framstår för mig som en avlägsen utopi, och jag kan inte se när i tiden det skulle bli en nyttig verklighet.

Jag lägger också in lexem, men mest för att prova. Jag lägger till böjningsformer med text-to-lexeme, men ingen semantik. --LA2 (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@LA2: Selv om det skulle ta lang tid å kunne få det i brukbar stand for Abstract Wikipedia, så ser jeg for meg at mye av det som legges inn allerede nå kan være nyttig for Wiktionary. Det er kanskje ingen maler/moduler ennå på Wiktionary som bruker Wikidata-leksemer, men det bør egentlig være relativt trivielt å opprette en modul som henter f.eks. bøyningsformer og uttale fra Wikidata til Wiktionary. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:04, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Ja, när det nu finns så många estniska böjningsformer här, borde de gå att presentera i sv.wiktionary. Vem kan skapa en modul för det? Jag har tagit upp frågan på wikt:sv:Wiktionary:Teknikvinden#Mall som hämtar från Wikidata. --LA2 (talk) 22:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Lurt! Jeg kan ikke gjøre det, i hvert fall ikke med det første. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 23:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #465Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #466Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #466Edit

MenyknappEdit

God kveld! Jeg har installert disse to Redigerer Wikidata:Project chat – Wikidata. Er det noen måte å få en "knapp" på venstresiden av mitt skjermbilde, slik at den blr enklere å bruke. Hendigt verktøy om man bruker det med fornuft. Pmt (talk) 19:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

@Pmt: Heiǃ Ja, det er en smal sak å legge til en knapp der. Det er imidlertid ett problem, og det er at jeg ikke kan se noen måte å «forhåndsutfylle» skjemaet med det Wikidata-elementet man allerede er på, så det vil uansett måtte bli til at man må kopiere og lime inn det. Jeg har bedt om at en slik funksjon legges til i verktøyet her. Om du vil ha ei lenke til verktøyet uansett så kan jeg godt fikse det? Jon Harald Søby (talk) 20:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Hei! Ja gjerne en knapp. Er du btw obs på sorteringsfunksjonen for emner! Mvh Pmt (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
@Pmt: Nei, hva er det? Jon Harald Søby (talk) 21:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Denne
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Tohaomg/rearrange_values.js which I think is loadable using mw.loader.load( '//www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User:Tohaomg/rearrange values.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript' ); presumably in your common.js. --Tagishsimon (diskusjon) 08:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[svar]
Thank you! --YukaSylvie (diskusjon) 01:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[svar]
Please don't rearrange statements like this. There is no point (order has no meaning in wikidata) and it crowds the page history. BrokenSegue (diskusjon) 01:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[svar]
+1. --Matěj Suchánek (diskusjon) 12:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Pmt (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
@Pmt: Ja, den ja. Er klar over at den finnes, men har ikke hatt noen anledning til å prøve den ut ennå. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 21:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #467Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #468Edit

Call for participation in the interview study with Wikidata editorsEdit

Dear Jon Harald Søby,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at the King’s College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research that develops a personalized recommendation system to suggest Wikidata items for the editors based on their interests and preferences. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I would love to talk with you to know about your current ways to choose the items you work on in Wikidata and understand the factors that might influence such a decision. Your cooperation will give us valuable insights into building a recommender system that can help improve your editing experience.

Participation is completely voluntary. You have the option to withdraw at any time. Your data will be processed under the terms of UK data protection law (including the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018). The information and data that you provide will remain confidential; it will only be stored on the password-protected computer of the researchers. We will use the results anonymized (?) to provide insights into the practices of the editors in item selection processes for editing and publish the results of the study to a research venue. If you decide to take part, we will ask you to sign a consent form, and you will be given a copy of this consent form to keep.

If you’re interested in participating and have 15-20 minutes to chat (I promise to keep the time!), please either contact me on kholoudsaa@gmail.com or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdmmFHaiB20nK14wrQJgfrA18PtmdagyeRib3xGtvzkdn3Lgw/viewform?usp=sf_link with your choice of the times that work for you.

I’ll follow up with you to figure out what method is the best way for us to connect.

Please contact me using the email mentioned above if you have any questions or require more information about this project.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Kholoud

Wikidata weekly summary #469Edit

Nyhetsbrev nr. 21 fra Wikimedia NorgeEdit

Jon Harald Søby 12:40, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #470Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #471Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #472Edit

Thanks for contributions to Bokmål lexemesEdit

Are these made by some script or by hand? Iwan.Aucamp (talk) 11:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

@Iwan.Aucamp: Thanks! I have documented (most of) the tools I use on User:Jon Harald Søby/bokmåltools, feel free to use and/or adapt them as you see fit! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #473Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #474Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #475Edit

ok Oysterx (talk) 09:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Request for open lockEdit

Jon Harald Søby, can you open lock the Xigazê article for me to edit note it for Vietnamese version? Thanks!Oysterx (talk) 09:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #476Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #478Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #479Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #480Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #477Edit

Nyhetsbrev nr. 22 fra Wikimedia NorgeEdit

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 13:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Nyhetsbrev nr. 22 fra Wikimedia NorgeEdit

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 10:50, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #481Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #482Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #483Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #484Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #485Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #486Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #487Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #488Edit

Property Det Norske Akademis ordbok-IDEdit

I have changed some of your edits on Det Norske Akademis Ordbok ID (P9958): identifier for a lexeme in Det Norske Akademis Ordbok as I can not see that they are giving the property any new information. For the labels it quite usua to use the full description as label and the short names as aliases. If you are using this property you will expire that aliases also will pop up as altenrnatives, so no worries. I also asked you the question on the property proposal what was wrong with the origial proposal since you also changed it completely without getting any answer. It is fully possible to discuss changes either during the proposal period or at the propertys discussion page. Deleting others work should not be nessesary. Pmt (talk) 06:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

@Pmt: Hei! Ingen grunn til å skrive på engelsk vel, vi er jo norske begge to? :-)
For det første: Beklager, det var ikke meninga å tråkke på noen tær der. Jeg så ikke spørsmålet om endringa jeg hadde gjort før i går kveld da egenskapen ble oppretta – hadde jeg sett det før hadde jeg svart så fort jeg kunne. (Grunnen til at jeg ikke så det før var dette – man får kun varsel hvis {{Ping}} legges til i samme endring som en signatur også legges til. Så siden {{Ping}} ble lagt til i en annen redigering enn signaturen din så fikk jeg ikke noe varsel. Trikset for å fikse det hvis man har en gjort liten skrivefeil e.l. er å erstatte den «gamle» signaturen sin med en ny signatur, altså ~~~~. Uansett, nok om det.)
Ang. etikett så har jeg ingen sterk mening, det er som du sier egentlig hipp som happ. Jeg foretrekker NAOB, siden det er det jeg alltid ser ordboka referert til som, og det er det de selv har putta i relativt fete typer på forsida si (og tittelfeltet). Men det spiller jo ingen stor rolle.
Så til hvorfor jeg bare kopierte over mitt forslag. Hovedsakelig fordi jeg var trøtt og ikke orka å ordne så veldig – jeg burde ha gjort en bedre jobb med å flette forslaga i stedet for å bare lime inn min over. Det jeg tenkte å gjøre var å lime inn mitt forslag «som utgangspunkt», og så overføre det fra ditt forslag som var bedre , men det gikk litt i glemmeboka. Det var jo noen ting fra forslaget ditt som ikke var helt riktig – blant annet var 3 av de 4 eksempelleksemene på nynorsk, og du er vel enig i at det blir feil at nynorskleksemer lenker til ei riksmålsordbok (ett av eksemplene har du lagt tilbake igjen i Det Norske Akademis Ordbok ID (P9958) etter at jeg fjerna det). I tillegg var regexen feil (den ville gitt feil på ord med æ, ø, å, é, ô og alt mulig annet som ikke er a-z), samt at jeg syntes vi bør sikte på eventually complete (Q21873974) i stedet for always incomplete (Q21873886). Men jeg burde jo også ha beholdt «stated in», antall ID-er, representerer o.l. – ja, rett og slett gjort en bedre jobb med å flette heller enn å bare overskrive. Så beklager det! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
@Jon Harald Søby: Thank you for replying. I have read your answer and should not have any further comments at the time being. I prefere writing in english here as the contributors to this property uses english as a lingua franca. Pmt (talk) 12:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #489Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #490Edit

New ItemEdit

Hi John Harald Søby, I created a new item Don't Live Here Anymore (2018 film) but I discovered the statements have exclamation marks. Is it an error I need to resolve? Olugold (talk) 09:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Olugold! I think the main reason is that the item is missing a instance of (P31) statement. I think it should just be instance of (P31) film (Q11424). (Also, the label should not have the "(2018 film)" part, that is only necessary on Wikipedia.) Jon Harald Søby (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
I appreciate your swift and detailed response. I'll resolve it immediately. Thank you. Olugold (talk) 09:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

@Jon Harald Søby I have edited as you suggested and it worked, just that the screenwriter still has an exclamation mark. Thank you. Olugold (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

If you click it, it should give you an idea why it appears. In this case, it is because Noni Salma (Q107453082) doesn't have a occupation (P106) statement – it should probably be occupation (P106) screenwriter (Q28389) (but quite possibly more things as well? I don't know). Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #491Edit

MergeEdit

Hi Jon Harald Søby! I created an item [15] and discovered it has been created with an alternative name [16]. I edited and have been trying to merged but an error notice keeps popping up. Can you please assist me in this regard? Thanks. Olugold (talk) 09:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Olugold! I merged them, and it worked without error. Did you use the merge gadget to try to merge them, or some other method? (Would be nice to figure out what the error is in case it happens again.) Jon Harald Søby (talk) 12:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
@Jon Harald Søby Thank you. I used the merged gadget, I also tried using the special:merge but it didn't work. This is some part of the error message I can remember ...description does not match Language en... Olugold (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)