Wikidata:Requests for permissions/RfPropertyCreator/September 2017
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
99of9
99of9 (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I've proposed and populated a few properties now: Australian Statistical Geography 2011 ID (P4014) Australian Statistical Geography 2016 ID (P4093) Australian Standard Geographic Classification 2006 ID (P4094), Wikidata:Property_proposal/Australian_Women's_Register_ID, and have participated in other proposal discussions. I'm pretty confident in my understanding of properties & datatypes. I'd like this right to help keep things moving once a proposal is ready. --99of9 (talk) 04:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Done --Lymantria (talk) 05:28, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 06:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Ptolusque
Ptolusque (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I've seen many property proposals, e.g. on Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control which are ready to be created and many more with unanimous support. There is a backlog of three months. I want to help creating these properties. Btw I'm about to become sysop on de.wikipedia on October 2nd. --Ptolusque (.-- .. -.- ..) 11:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC) Ptolusque (.-- .. -.- ..) 11:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- A bit too early to my opinion. You have contributed 814 edits to Wikidata, of which only the latest 2 were in Property: or Property_talk: namespace. I suggest to gain some more experience with properties, property proposals, as well as related concepts (constraints, data types), and then request for this right in a couple of months again. I recently formed an opinion about your dewiki contributions due to your ongoing RfA thereover, and I am pretty optimistic that you would learn quickly here as well. It is correct that the field of property creation and maintenance needs more attention, but there are a lot of things to curate and contribute without property creation rights in the beginning as well. —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- @MisterSynergy: I see your point. I hope someone will catch up with the huge backlog on property proposals anyway. --Ptolusque (.-- .. -.- ..) 19:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Don’t worry about the delay, progress is slow sometimes. The older proposals in the Authority control section do not have sufficient support anyway to my opinion, so they are not ready for creation. If you’d like to engage in this field, help with property proposals, property page maintenance, and have an active look at the property deletion section as well; also help to deal with constraint issues. As I said, there is need for such work (even without property creation rights), and we’d quickly appreciate your efforts. Some months of active and useful participation would very likely be enough for extra rights. —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done Needs more experience. Lymantria (talk) 09:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
