Property talk:P6594

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Miraclepine in topic Judith Marie Olsen

Documentation

Guggenheim fellows ID
identifier for a person awarded a Guggenheim fellowship in the arts
RepresentsGuggenheim Fellowship (Q1316544)
Associated itemJohn Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (Q507237), John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (Q507237)
Applicable "stated in" valueGuggenheim Fellows database (Q107425373)
Data typeExternal identifier
Allowed values[a-z\d\-]+
ExamplePatricia Rieff Anawalt (Q29975543)patricia-rieff-anawalt
Louise Glück (Q2344210)louise-gluck
Albert Stadler (Q42816179)albert-stadler
Sourcehttps://www.gf.org/fellows/
Formatter URLhttps://www.gf.org/fellows/all-fellows/$1/
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P6594 (Q62582346)
Related to country  United States of America (Q30) (See 762 others)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total37,253
Main statement19,101 out of 18,296 (104% complete)51.3% of uses
Qualifier3<0.1% of uses
Reference18,14948.7% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Item “instance of (P31): human (Q5): Items with this property should also have “instance of (P31): human (Q5)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Item P31, search, SPARQL
Format “[a-z\d\-]+: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Format, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Scope, SPARQL
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Single value, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Unique value, hourly updated report, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Item “sex or gender (P21): Items with this property should also have “sex or gender (P21)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Item P21, search, SPARQL
Item “occupation (P106): Items with this property should also have “occupation (P106)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Item P106, search, SPARQL
Item “country of citizenship (P27): Items with this property should also have “country of citizenship (P27)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Item P27, search, SPARQL
Item “given name (P735): Items with this property should also have “given name (P735)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Item P735, search, SPARQL
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Item P166, search, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6594#Entity types

Convert to identifier edit

As noted by Thierry Caro at Wikidata:Property proposal/Guggenheim fellows ID: This property was created as type string, but should be of type External identifier. I opened phab:T219699 to convert it. Multichill (talk) 09:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Done by user:Hoo man [1]. Multichill (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Question about constraints edit

This may be the incorrect place to pose the question, but I wanted to ask why so many constraints (gender, date of birth, etc.) are placed on this property? The Guggenheim Fellows application page and Fellows' profile pages do not necessarily require/make this information public. Can we open a review for some of these constraints? Rolery02 (talk) 15:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I agree with User:Rolery02. --Gerwoman (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
The constraints are non-mandatory and most items comply with them. Even if there is a constraint, this doesn't prevent you from adding the identifier without adding other information. If you don't know some of these elements, an item for the person should probably not be created in the first place. --- Jura 19:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Used about 2700 times, only a few violations. Good encouragement to improve quality and completeness. Multichill (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Jura1: Place of birth is a requires statement constraint, which seems like overkill. I just did a query and 647 people who have this ID do not have that statement. Perhaps some of these should be re-evaluated as suggestions instead? I was in a conversation today, for example, where a person was disinclined to add the property to the person's entity because she could not find the person's place of birth and got the flag. But the person was certainly a fellow and had most other characteristics. I think it makes sense to have some like occupation as required. That's relevant to the award. The other is additional helpful knowledge and makes far more sense as recommendation. Ruthbrarian (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Ruthbrarian: agree, Wikidata:Database_reports/Constraint_violations/P6594#Item_P19 grew quite a bit. I made it a suggestion constraint. Multichill (talk) 22:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
It seems to me like an irrelevant suggestion: sure, adding a place of birth to a person's item would be good, but that's the case whether or not they are a Guggenheim Fellow. We could add the same constraint to every property intended to be used on items for people. Ghouston (talk) 03:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Question about description edit

Hello, the current description is

identifier for a person awarded a Guggenheim fellowship in the arts

However, the Wikipedia(en) text is

... who have demonstrated exceptional capacity for productive scholarship or exceptional creative ability in the arts ...

The website itself has the text

... offers Fellowships to further the development of scholars and artists ...

Other than a very liberal reading of 'the arts' to mean 'scholarship,' shouldn't the description be changed to include the other reason for awarding the fellowship? Personally I have not changed the description as I am not sure how property descriptions work. Xenmorpha (talk) 12:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Judith Marie Olsen edit

The entry that mentions a 2012 General Nonfiction fellow named Judith Marie Olsen is almost certainly inaccurate due to having the same given name and surname from two other 2012 fellows (Fiction fellow Lance Olsen's surname and General Nonfiction fellow Judith Pascoe's given name), and because I could not find relevant hits on Google Search, Google Books or VIAF that matched perfectly with such a person. ミラP@Miraclepine 19:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P6594" page.