(Q28730286)

April 2022 Public Data File from Crossref

copyright status

copyrighted

0 references

cites work

Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

17 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

17 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

17 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals

17 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials

17 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting

17 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses

17 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

The scandal of poor medical research

17 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

17 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial

7 April 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

To publish or perish: how to review a manuscript.

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Results of a longitudinal study of rigorous manuscript submission guidelines designed to improve the quality of clinical research reporting in a peer-reviewed surgical journal

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Peer reviewer training and editor support: results from an international survey of nursing peer reviewers.

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'.

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments

3 June 2018

2 references

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

3 June 2018

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035621

A systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study

3 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Changing expectations: Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?

20 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal

20 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence

20 June 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035621

CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035621

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035621

The International EQUATOR Network: enhancing the quality and transparencyof health care research

21 January 2018

2 references

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035621

21 January 2018

12 December 2020

The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035621

The content of medical journal Instructions for authors.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3338712

Enhanced quality and transparency of health research reporting can lead to improvements in public health policy decision-making: help from the EQUATOR Network

27 November 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

What constitutes a great review?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement

1 reference

12 December 2020

Adoption of CONSORT statements for randomized control trials published in the Journal of Pediatric Nursing

1 reference

12 December 2020

The EQUATOR Network: promoting the transparent and accurate reporting of research

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0035621

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

3073065

ADS bibcode

2012PLoSO...735621H

0 references

3073065

1 reference

1 reference

1 reference