Talk:Q47574

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Infovarius in topic Work

Autodescription — unit of measurement (Q47574)

description: real scalar quantity, defined and adopted by convention, with which any other quantity of the same kind can be compared to express the ratio of the two quantities as a number (VIM)
Useful links:
Classification of the class unit of measurement (Q47574)  View with Reasonator View with SQID
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
unit of measurement⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1)
Generic queries for classes

Union and disjoint queries

See also


measured physical quantity: Dimension of physical quantity

edit

A physical dimension (such as Mass) is measured by a unit of measurement (such as kilogram).
The idea was to model this as the inverse:
A "unit of measurement" has a "measured physical quantity" called a "Dimension of physical quantity".
But maybe there's a better way to do this (or none at all). DavRosen (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Let's look at the International Vocabulary of Metrology

edit

@Infovarius: If you look up item 1.19 in the International Vocabulary of Metrology, you will a number of examples of "values", the first of which is "EXAMPLE 1 Length of a given rod: 5.34 m or 534 cm". Since this publication comes from a reputable source, I am inclined to accept its definiton, namely that a "unit of measurement" is part of a "value" - after all there is a big difference between 5.34 and 534, yet, once the units are added, they both relate to the same value. Martinvl (talk) 21:57, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Infovarius: I am not happy with a "unit of measurement" being listed as a sub-class of a physical quantity. I can think of three valid sub-classes of physical quentities - scalar quantities (for example mass, energy), vector quantities (for example force, torque) and tensor quantities (for example stress). Furthermore, as discussed earlier, I still think that a "unit of measurement" is part of a "physical value", not a sub-class of a physical measurement. Martinvl (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Martinvl's reasoning seems sound to me. Jc3s5h (talk) 00:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Property removal

edit

I ‎removed a claim: subclass of (P279): standard (Q1271511)). Standards sometimes are a method of defining a unit (e.g. kilogram). Other times they are an approximate implementation of a unit, useful in testing a less accurate implementation. (For example, in the past, a surveyor might have sent a high-quality surveying tape to a national laboratory where it would be laid upon a standard bench, equipped with metre marks, and a report would be issued describing how much the tape departed from the standard bench. Then the surveyor would store the tape in a safe place and use it periodically to test the length of tapes subjected to to the rough-and-tumble of field work.)

I do not think this reality fits the subclass of (P279) property. Jc3s5h (talk) 00:16, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Work

edit

I propose this as superclass as all units were invented ("created") by humans. Also it helps to bypass constraint violation for using based on (P144) in them. --Infovarius (talk) 16:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

You mean work (Q386724) (we have a lot of other things labeled "work")? artificial object (Q16686448) might be better, as generally a work would have a known creator, but I don't think that's generally the case for units. But maybe some do? ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Some do for sure. Probably most recent units like becquerel (Q102573). Yes, Q386724. --Infovarius (talk) 15:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Reading the short property proposal for based on (P144), for instance the comment "For example, book used for movie screenplay, or poem used by opera libretto.", this property is intended for creative works, not for any identifiable thing conceived by humans. Toni 001 (talk) 22:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes, creative work (Q17537576) is a separate class and I don't think that units belong to it. But if they are not works how to model that pascal (Q44395) is defined ("derived") from newton (Q12438) and metre (Q11573) (or square metre (Q25343))? --Infovarius (talk) 15:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Units are defined through their quantities. Quantities are either base quantities or defined through equations in terms of base quantities. Wikidata models this by linking units and quantities, and listing a defining equation with the quantity. Toni 001 (talk) 09:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
So where I can find equation pascal (Q44395) = newton (Q12438) / square metre (Q25343) (not in LaTeX but item form)? --Infovarius (talk) 13:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Q47574" page.