Open main menu

User talk:Abián

About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Abián/Archive 1 on 2016-07-09.

92.184.112.38 (talkcontribs)
92.184.112.38 (talkcontribs)
Abián (talkcontribs)

Hi! In general, to make changes to semi-protected Items you can either use the template {{Edit request}} on the discussion pages of the Items you want to edit or use your registered user account to edit yourself (the latter is probably a more convenient option). Please remember that, together with the specific edit you're mentioning, you should include a proper reference to meet the verifiability criteria (see Help:Sources). If you don't know exactly how to do so, or if you have any other doubts, please feel free to ask me again! And thanks for your contributions. :-)

92.184.112.38 (talkcontribs)

Here are reliable sources: and . So could you please do so instead of me?

Abián (talkcontribs)

Of course,  done! I finally used more official sources, although yours were also acceptable.

92.184.112.38 (talkcontribs)

Thank you! Good contributions,

92.184.102.222 (talkcontribs)
92.184.102.222 (talkcontribs)

(On the same item obviously...)

Abián (talkcontribs)
VIGNERON (talkcontribs)
92.184.102.18 (talkcontribs)

OK. So could you please remove the mentions of D. Lauga and F. Lalanne from Gard's item, please, Abián? I've added it on the prefecture's one (Préfecture du Gard (Q59210315)).

92.184.102.107 (talkcontribs)

<nowiki>Hello. I would like to complete the list of prefects of Gard on the same item, with head of government (P6). Given that the item is protected, how may I do so without using a registered account?

VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Hi,

The item is not protected, but it seems that you activated the abuse filter new editor removing statement. If it is true then you can still add statement. Could you check ?

And as this filter is for new user, creating an account is the easiest solution (and it will make everyone else life easier too. Plus an account is more anonymous than an IP ;) ).

92.184.102.107 (talkcontribs)
VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Ho, you're speaking of Gard (Q12515), but shouldn't the P6 be added on the other non-protected Gard items? (like I said before)

92.184.102.107 (talkcontribs)

At least not the prefects, since, precisely, they have authority over the ''département''.

VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Uh? No, the prefect « have authority over the département » seems and feels rong. I'll start a discussion on Wikidata talk:WikiProject France to have more view on this matter (and talk in French since this is a French matter).

Reply to "Modifications on Gard's item"
Rémy Lee (talkcontribs)

Hello Abián, could you add Rome as a Featured Article of Vietnamese Wikipedia with the gold star icon? The article [[:vi:Roma]] is voted successfully as vi's Featured Article according to [[:vi:Wikipedia:Ứng cử viên bài viết chọn lọc/Roma]]. Because Rome has been protected on Wikidata so I hope that you could add it for me. Thank you Abián. Rémy Lee (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Abián (talkcontribs)

 Done. Congrats!

Reply to "Rome (Vietnamese)"
Gorkaazk (talkcontribs)

Buenas tardes Abián,


la IP que utilizo, o el nombre de usuario que utilizo, ha sido bloqueado por Vd.


Creo que hoy he tenido algún problema al intentar fundir la subcategoría "Videos created with Blender" con otras categorías de Blender.

Cuando el resultado no ha sido el esperado creo haber revertido yo mismo mis errores.

He actuando siempre de buena fe: si revisa la historia de mis ediciones verá que, aunque todavía estoy aprendiendo a editar en Wikipedia, no practico el vandalismo.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gorkaazk



Abián (talkcontribs)

¡Hola, Gorkaazk! Tu cuenta de usuario registrado no parece estar bloqueada en ningún proyecto Wikimedia. ¿En qué proyecto estás teniendo problemas?

Gorkaazk (talkcontribs)

Habrá sido bloqueada, entonces, la IP de mi lugar de trabajo.


Hoy, sobre las 16:00 h, al editar en Wikidata ,desde mi lugar de trabajo, me ha salido un mensaje de ''vandalism!'' que me sugería que me pusiera en contacto contigo.

El número de bloqueo y el número de IP, los iba a copiar debajo del mensaje que te he puesto más arriba pero el propio bloqueo me ha impedido añadir un anexo con el número de bloqueo y el número de IP.


Todo esto me ha pillado en un momento que tenía que salir urgentemente y habré cometido quizás algún error.


Ahora, desde casa, no he tenido ningún problema en editar en Wikidata.

Gorkaazk (talkcontribs)

Problemas al editar en Wikidata desde mi lugar de trabajo.

IP 150.241.162.248

Bloque número #13124

Se me sugiere que me ponga en contacto con Abián u otro admin.


El Bloqueo ha sido establecido por... (Copio / traduzco parte de la nota que me aparece):

Blokeoa Abián-ek ezarri du. Emandako arrazoia hau da: Vandalism: Static IPs, repeated.

  • Inicio del bloqueo: 15:04, 18 marzo 2019
  • Final bloqueo: 15:04, 18 mazo 2020
  • Bloqueado: 150.241.162.128/25Blokeoari buruz eztabaidatzeko, jo ezazu Abián edo beste administratzaile batengana. "Erabiltzaile honi e-posta bidali" tresna erabili ahal izateko, ezinbestekoa da zure hobespenetan baliozkoa den helbide elektroniko bat emanda izatea, eta tresna hori erabiltzeko aukera blokeatu ez izana. Orain duzun IP helbidea 150.241.162.248 da, eta blokeoaren zenbakia #13124. Mesedez,
Gorkaazk (talkcontribs)

DESBLOQUEADO. ¡¡¡GRACIAS!!!

Gorkaazk (talkcontribs)

Vuelvo a tener problemas desde distintos ordenadores detrás del la IP de mi puestro de trabajo: IP 150.241.162.248; número de bloqueo #13124.


Me conecto siempre usando mi nonbre de usuario. Tenía entendido que usando usuario + contraseña se podría editar incluso desde IP bloqueadas


@Gorkaazk

Abián (talkcontribs)

Puedes probar ahora. Ya no deberías tener ningún tipo de problema. Saludos.

Gorkaazk (talkcontribs)

Gracias Abián. He probado y todo bien ;-)

Reply to "Vandalismo"
Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talkcontribs)

Buonasera da Coreca, Calabria, Italia, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai, io sto abbastanza bene per ora. Ti posso chiedere una cortesia? Il Wikidata di Fanny Cadeo ha qualcosa che manca. ad esempio l'attrice è separata dal partner Stefano Caviglia da 3 anni, e ancora nonostante tutto non è stato inserito ne il partner ne la fine della relazione. come si può rimediare? la relazione è durata 3 anni, dal 2013 al 2016, potresti per favore aiutarmi a inserirla tu? Nell'attesa di tue notizie ti ringrazio in anticipo.

Abián (talkcontribs)

¡Hola, Luigi! De antemano, perdón por escribirte en español. Dado que parece que no hay ningún elemento sobre Stefano Caviglia, es necesario crear uno primero sobre él. Después puedes usar la propiedad partner (P451) para definir este nuevo elemento como valor en el elemento Fanny Cadeo (Q3739265) e indicar la fecha de fin en esa declaración con el calificador end time (P582). Por favor, no olvides incluir referencias a fuentes externas fidedignas que permitan contrastar la información, y siéntete libre de preguntar si tienes cualquier otra duda. ¡Saludos!

Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talkcontribs)

Buenos días de nuevo, me disculpo por la demora en responderte. Bueno, ¿cómo queremos proceder? ¿Necesitamos crear una subpágina de Stefano Caviglia? ¿Qué se debe hacer en estos casos? Puedo contactar a la Sra. Cadeo y darme los detalles de su ex pareja. Avísame y disculpa mi mal español, pero ahora lo estoy recuperando en la universidad. Muchas gracias por ahora.

Reply to "Un aiuto per Fanny Cadeo"
דגש חזק (talkcontribs)

pleca block.

Abián (talkcontribs)

Done. Thanks!

Reply to "now is 46.19.85.2"

Copy references in Wikidata schemata

4
Pintoch (talkcontribs)

Hi!

I just wanted to let you know that I implemented in OpenRefine a feature you suggested: copying references in a Wikidata schema. This feature is available in the latest release, version 3.2 beta: https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/releases/tag/3.2-beta If it does not behave as you had expected, do let me know!

Cheers

Abián (talkcontribs)

Hi, Pintoch!

I think it was @Ijon who suggested that feature. It's a useful one! Now that I know the 3.2 beta is available, I'll try it as soon as I find some free time.

Thank you very much!

Pintoch (talkcontribs)

Ah indeed, sorry for the confusion and the noise!

Ijon (talkcontribs)

Thank you very much! :)

Reply to "Copy references in Wikidata schemata"
Maria zaos (talkcontribs)

Hola, muchas gracias por la reversión de:

Desfacer a modificación 715979717 de Maria zaos (talk): It's not the same at all, municipio de España (Q2074737) is a subclass of a subclass of concello (Q15284))

Mil perdones por el error. Me estoy haciendo un lío con las etiquetas en relación a las propiedades de divisiones administrativas para Galicia.(no entidades administrativas)

¿Sabrías decirme en el caso de Galicia a qué nivel pertenecen las siguientes subdivisiones administrativas? (o donde/como podría verificarlo?-las distintas wikipedias dan datos contradictorios y no acabo de verlo claro en las consultas en Wikidata-)

Comarca/Parroquia/Lugar

Muchas gracias! User:Maria zaos

Abián (talkcontribs)

¡Hola!

No te preocupes, gracias a ti por tus contribuciones, y perdón por la brevedad del resumen de edición.

municipality (Q15284) es la entidad correspondiente a la idea general de municipio, aplicable a todo el mundo. Alguien escribió la etiqueta en gallego como «concello», y puede que esto no sea lo más acertado. No sé gallego, así que te pregunto a ti... ¿crees que la etiqueta en gallego «municipio» sería más adecuada para esta entidad?

Para aclarar el tema de la organización de entidades territoriales administrativas, hace un tiempo creé la página Help:P131/Q29, que quizá te sea de ayuda. Las comarcas cuelgan directamente de las comunidades autónomas —en este caso, Galicia—. No estoy familiarizado con la idea de las parroquias y de los lugares; no obstante, si lo que leo aquí es cierto, las parroquias deberían colgar de los municipios; los lugares, de las parroquias.

Saludos, y a tu disposición si necesitas alguna otra cosa en la que pueda ayudar.

Reply to "municipio vs concello"
2003:DE:711:1863:B039:BF87:9D9B:1144 (talkcontribs)
Abián (talkcontribs)
2003:DE:726:C3B0:195C:EA11:ED7B:7836 (talkcontribs)

I don't think the image will be deleted -~~~~

Abián (talkcontribs)

Okay,  done!

2003:DE:726:C302:804A:910F:C9FC:35D2 (talkcontribs)

Thanks

Reply to "Q42622"
Jura1 (talkcontribs)

Can you go ahead with this and revert the 3000 ?

Abián (talkcontribs)

Hi! Since both the quantitative analysis and my experience concluded those semi-protections benefit Wikimedia projects and that's my only purpose as a volunteer, reverting them myself would go against my mission; nonetheless, any other administrator with different criteria should feel free to revert those actions at their own risk, and I'll be okay with that, that's how a wiki is supposed to work. If any of them do so, they should take into account that on 26 January I only semi-protected 2357 Items, the remaining ones were already protected.

Succu (talkcontribs)

Looks like a Deadmin is necessary?! --Succu (talk) 22:26, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Jura1 (talkcontribs)

I hadn't actually seen Abian using their admin access much to actually do what it's for .. so it's something we need to think about.

ChristianKl (talkcontribs)

You used admin rights in a way that violates policy.

It's a lot of work to unprotected those items and you are the person who caused the work through policy violating actions and thus as an admin I think it's your job to clean up the mess you created.

Rschen7754 (talkcontribs)

Per Wikidata:Administrators#Accountability, "Administrators are expected to reply promptly and civilly to concerns about their administrator actions". Can you please reply to the concern that such a large protection should have been discussed first? Can you agree to discuss before doing something similar in the future?

In the end, *that* is what I am more worried about than the protections.

Abián (talkcontribs)

I replied promptly and civilly on Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#Protection_of_thousand_of_items twice and the first reply was mine. Those two replies and the ones in this thread are everything I can say, all I can do now is repeating them together. ChristianKl categorically claims twice in this thread that I violated policies and of course I didn't; although he can think differently, those statements are very serious without providing any evidence or quotes from Wikidata policies. Maybe he didn't reflect the exact idea he wanted to reflect, so I won't take the message too seriously.

Rschen7754 (talkcontribs)

Can you reply to my last question? "Can you agree to discuss before doing something similar in the future?"

Abián (talkcontribs)

I don't intend to semiprotect any more Wikidata entities based on their use by Wikimedia pages. If with "something similar" you mean actions with a lower degree of similarity, I'll also be happy to tell you if you give me a few examples.

Reply to "unprotection of items"
NMaia (talkcontribs)
Ederporto (talkcontribs)
Abián (talkcontribs)

Hi! Both entities were identified as two of the 500 most used Wikidata Items across the Wikimedia projects. According to the data provided by the development team, they have at least several tens of thousands of uses, which correspond to the potential damage a hypothetical malicious edit on one of these entities would cause to the wikisphere. Special:WhatLinksHere only shows links between Wikidata entities, it doesn't consider uses (e.g., you can retrieve and show an Item's label on a normal wikitext page without linking it) and it doesn't consider Wikipedias nor the other sister projects, where the actual problem and the vast majority of uses come from. I'm sorry I didn't link the corresponding Phabricator task from the summary, I was trying to avoid giving bad ideas to the wrong people. But you're nice people, :-) so you can read the details here and should feel free to ask me any other question you may have. Thanks for caring!

Return to the user page of "Abián".