User talk:Multichill/Archives/2015/April
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Landschap met de barmhartige Samaritaan Landscape with the Good Samaritan (Q17330312)
Hi Multichill, dit werk is van een nafolger of Elsheimer, zie rijksmuseum. Heb je enig idee hou wij dit kunnen uitdrucken. Wij kunnen dit mischien in het project discuteeren. HG Oursana (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hoi Oursana, ik heb op Wikidata talk:WikiProject Visual arts#Anonymous works een voorstel gedaan. Ik moet die properties nog voorstellen op Wikidata:Property proposal. Daar ben ik nog niet aan toe gekomen. Dus mocht je zin hebben..... ;-)
- Ps. Doe je mee aan Art+Feminism? Ik doe mee bij het Stedelijk en ga zo nog wat lijstje maken zodat we wat hebben om over te schrijven. Multichill (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Multichill, kan je forgery after (P1778) veranderen eenvoudig after zonder forgery want niet alle copies zijn vervalsingen. Kunnen deze nieuwe eigenschappen op het lijstje? Oursana (talk) 19:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
BotMultiChill mistake
Hi, I just want to warn that this edit https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q685935&curid=646280&diff=204664170&oldid=197264339 seems wrong, I hope your bot did not make a lot of this kind of mistakes. How did he built this claim ?
A revue is a kind of magazine, not a magazine, aren't it ? See Help:Classification.
TomT0m (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- @TomT0m: killing claimless items on the Dutch Wikipedia. Might contain the occasional mistake. Multichill (talk) 20:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Another one
Hoi Multichill, de eigenschap country (P17) is toch alleen voor geografische entiteiten? Zie deze wijziging door je bot. Het item gaat trouwens ook niet over een specifiek Nederlands begrip, al is er kennelijk maar één andere Wikipedia met een artikel erover. Bever (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Scraping and so
Hey Multichill, I saw that you recently replaced several copyright signs on the Netherlands' museum list at the Sum of All Paintings project pages with a remark along the lines of 'this must be scrapable'. Do we have the right to do that, from Wikidata's copyright point of view? I'm just checking because I was wondering that myself. De Pont, a private museum, also has some nice structured info about its (contemporary art!) collection online and I had been thinking to do some scraping there, at least if that would pose no problems here. Spinster (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)