User talk:Multichill/Archives/2022/October

Category:Vladimir Izotov (Q114347587 & Q114067833)

Multichill Bot, I can't delete this category, can you delete it yourself?! The category has two numbers - Q114347587 and Q114067833, the one I created has the number Q114347587, I want you to delete it and leave only Q114067833, these categories are too similar. I want to add to category Q114067833 an additional link to the same category "Vladimir Izotov" (Q114347587), you understand, to add files to Wikimedia Commons, but I don't get anything, can you help me?! Please! Benedictus de Spinoza (talk) 02:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

P373

Regarding your bot's recent edits, I cannot really see any benefit to adding Commons category (P373) to an item which already has a sitelink to commons. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

How unexpected, I'm not going to rehash Wikidata:Properties for deletion/P373. Multichill (talk) 21:04, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Next time your bot is pro-adding P373, I will soon re-nominate, don't you know? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: you added this comment and removed it again causing two pings. What are you trying to say here? Multichill (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Simply, I will consider re-NOMINATING P373 for deletion if I have free time. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Commons-kategori

Thank you for populating Commons category (P373). I am ckecking sv:Kategori:Wikipedia:Artiklar med Commonscatmall som saknar property P373 and your bot is of great help. Maundwiki (talk) 14:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

@Maundwiki: thanks for you message. Always good to hear that my effort is appreciated. Multichill (talk) 16:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

https://w.wiki/5nh4 looks like still quite a few to do. Multichill (talk) 09:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Q28061662

Hey Multichill, Allegory of Impermanence (Q28061662) seems to be conflation two different paintings, and your bot is heavily involved. Can you please investigate and fix this thing? Thanks, MisterSynergy (talk) 21:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy: thanks for pointing that out. Probably one of the sources mixed up inventory numbers causing this mess. I'll have a look at it later and untangle it. Multichill (talk) 19:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy: fixed it. https://www.dhm.de/datenbank/linzdbv2/queryresult.php?obj_no=LI003159 listed 2589 as inventory number which is the NK2589 on Allegory of Impermanence (Q28061662), but the inventory number is NK2598 which would have given Q28060173. These inventory numbers are like a foreign key (Q1056760): If you enter the wrong one, you'll end up at a completely different item. Unfortunately in my experience art historians seem to be quite sloppy with these. Multichill (talk) 16:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Please play fair

Hi Multichill,

please stop your bot from harassing me. The correct item for this Commons link is Category:Low-energy building (Q114774479).

Thanks in advance Dixiparty (talk) 16:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

@Dixiparty: The bot is not harassing, the bot just copies the sitelink. If you think it should be on a different item, you should move the sitelink. Your choice of words is very inconvenient and that's not the first time.

Makes me wonder how new you are to Wikidata. Is this the first account you used here? Multichill (talk) 16:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

It makes me wonder whether you are gonna act on your bot's action or not. Please don't ask me for personal information; I do enjoy my privacy.--Dixiparty (talk) 16:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Multichill already explained you why the bot made this kind of edits and how to avoid it in the future. Matlin (talk) 16:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

@Dixiparty: bot works as designed, so no action needed from my side. If you move the sitelink, the bot will add the missing Commons category (P373). Might be a bit hard for a new inexperienced user, but I'm sure you'll manage. If you need help, you should ask (nicely).

I'm not asking you for any personal information, I'm asking if you had an account before here, not what that account is or what your name is. Multichill (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

WD's decision makers can be accused of a lot, but harassment with bots? XD Matlin (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

@Matlin: Indeed, that just takes the biscuit!--Dixiparty (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Q105632611

The website of the Metropolitan Museum of Art indicates that the work belongs to a private collection and was temporarily exhibited at the museum in 2016 for the exhibition: "Vigée Le Brun: Woman Artist in Revolutionary France". Therefore, indicating the Met as a location is simply misinforming.Ecummenic (talk) 21:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Updated Q105632611#P276. Multichill (talk) 10:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)