Fate/stay Night merge edit

Hi!

I am not 100% convinced by the merge of Fate/stay night (Q72092849) into Fate/stay night (Q857823): I had created Fate/stay night (Q72092849) back in 2019, to be about the video game, split off from Fate/stay night (Q857823) which was a super-conflated game/anime/manga item, really about the media franchise (Q196600). Unfortunately it seems that media franchise (Q196600) was somehow repurposed to be about the video game at some point, but still conflated with some anime/film identifiers... Jean-Fred (talk) 16:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm not entirely sure how to handle a situation like this. It sort of seems video game-specific, but I can see what you're talking about with it still maintaining some anime/film identifiers. I guess making an anime-specific offshoot entry would be a good idea. After all there are multiple animes of it. OmegaFallon (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
See Wikidata:WikiProject Anime and Manga/Splitting shared items for some discussion of the problem.
The main problem I see was that Fate/stay night (Q857823) was repurposed to be something else than it was, which should never happen − but that’s not your fault.
Creating an item for the anime entry (if there’s none yet) would probably be a good idea.
Jean-Fred (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q116751960 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

WiKirby ID edit

Hello!

I noticed you had previously proposed the Fallout Wiki ID (P11589), which I supported. If you have any other interest in independent wikis, I'm proposing a property about WiKirby (Q107338633) (Found Here). Once again, I don't know if you necessarily care, but I thought I'd bring it up to you, since you seem at least knowledgeable about the topic of video game wikis.

Best regards,

VGPaleontologist (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q116751959 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 11:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q116474931 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 12:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q116698837 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 09:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q116752927 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 09:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q116775012 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 11:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q117080203 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q117078344 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q117078337 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q117078333 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 15:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q117078340 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 15:43, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q117078339 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 15:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q117078397 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 15:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q117079423 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Automated report of empty item: Q117078343 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 16:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Warning: property constraint changes edit

Hello. Could you please explain why you removed ([1], [2], [3]) these valid constraints and where was the discussion about removing them? Did you know that you have caused over 20,000 (!) constraint violations right now with these changes? Since this isn't the first time ([4], [5]) I've seen you cause constraint violations, I'm really wondering if I should start reviewing all of your property constraint changes in order to see where else you've triggered such situations... Could you stop with those changes for now and maybe start using relevant talk pages to discuss first before apply those changes? Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Apologies, I should've started a discussion about it before doing it. OmegaFallon (talk) 11:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Neon Annihilator (Q116862236) edit

Thoughts on how i made the item? Trade (talk) 15:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply