Wikidata:Property proposal/Belgian Heritage in Brazil ID
Belgian Heritage in Brazil ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
| Description | The Belgian heritage in Brazil (Q55362823) identifier for notorious individuals, companies and artworks associated to the Belgian heritage in Brazil |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Allowed values | text |
| Example 1 | Portrait of Joaquim Pires Pereira de Almeida (Q55511256) → painting/joaquim-pires-de-almeida |
| Example 2 | Adrien Henri Vital van Emelen (Q5474348) → creator/van-emelen-adrien-henri-vital-1868-1943 |
| Example 3 | Elevador Lacerda (Q1328348) → heritage/elevador-lacerda |
| Source | http://belgianclub.com.br/pt-br |
| Planned use | mix'n'match itens, to ease info import in the context of a GLAM initiative |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
Motivation
This is an inventory of Belgian Heritage in Brazil. Brazilian Wikimedians are currently running a GLAM initiative with this inventory [1]. This ID will help us get data to feed items that are being created in the context of this GLAM initiative, such as items on paintings, notorious individuals, companies and so on. Thanks. --Joalpe (talk) 02:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
Support David (talk) 09:19, 14 July 2018 (UTC)- Support Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Comment shouldn't this be split by type (individuals, companies and artworks)? How many ids are there? − Pintoch (talk) 07:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Thanks! I don't believe it is necessary to split it, as there are only around 1,000 itens in the inventory. What do you think? And sorry for taking longer than usual to reply; I was off. --Joalpe (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- If the source is small and you do not need type constraints, what about using described at URL (P973) directly? − Pintoch (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Well, I guess the ID property in this case is not particularly different from other cases, in terms of practical benefits: mix'n'match, querying, constraint information, ease of access of information in infoboxes (i.e., automated Commons IBs). What do you think? --Joalpe (talk) 16:13, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- If the source is small and you do not need type constraints, what about using described at URL (P973) directly? − Pintoch (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)