Wikidata:Property proposal/BrainInfo ID (hierarchical)

BrainInfo ID (hierarchical mode)

edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science

Descriptionnumeric identifier of a brain structure in the BrainInfo (NeuroNames) database in hierarchical mode
Data typeExternal identifier
Template parameterBrainInfo ID in w:en:Template:Infobox brain
Domainbrain structures
Allowed values0-99999
Example283 in the thalamus (Q184215) --> 283
Sourcehttp://braininfo.rprc.washington.edu/SearchByName.aspx
External linksUse in sister projects: [ar][de][en][es][fr][he][it][ja][ko][nl][pl][pt][ru][sv][vi][zh][commons][species][wd][en.wikt][fr.wikt].
Planned useadding this ID to the Wikidata items of brain structures
Formatter URLhttp://braininfo.rprc.washington.edu/Scripts/hiercentraldirectory.aspx?ID=$1
See alsoInterlex ID (P696), UBERON ID (P1554). Those databases frequently store and cite BrainInfo IDs altogether
Motivation

Need to centralize using BrainInfo IDs in article infoboxes about brain structures in ru-wiki and en-wiki. Often there are bugs and inconsistencies between wiki. This is not seen with already centralized IDs, like TA98 code or Terminologia Embryologica code, or the aforementioned NeuroLex ID. Роман Беккер (talk) 22:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Notified participants of WikiProject Medicine

Discussion
  • I'm certain that creating an ID with the ID that's publically shown on the website makes sense. I'm less certain whether we should store data about this "hierarchical mode" ID. If you think we should also store the "hierarchical mode", can you make a case about why you think storing both is valuable? ChristianKl (talk) 23:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's because:

  1. The "hierarchical mode" IDs can be easily found and copied from the NeuroLex wiki entity of the corresponding brain structure, and/or from English Wikipedia Infobox brain parameter BrainInfo ID where there is BrainInfoMode=hier;
  2. As far as I can see, the current version of Wikipedia Infobox brain does not accept "normal" BrainInfo IDs and does not form the right URLs with them. They work only with "hier" or "ancil". At least, I couldn't make them work with the parameter BrainInfoMode left blank, or containing something like "plain", "normal" etc. And also the template is very poorly documented. Maybe because this is a new BrainInfo ID system and the template in en-wiki was not updated yet. And I'm being not an admin can't fix a protected template in the first place. And in the second place, I'm not so great in template language to do that myself and to not broke the template :-) So, at least temporarily, if we want to centralize the currently used BrainInfo parameters, we should be able to store "hierarchical" and/or "ancillary" IDs. And then I'd ask someone in Enwiki to update the template to form correct URLs with "normal" BrainInfo IDs too. Роман Беккер (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]