Wikidata:Property proposal/of

Not done

Description	qualifier as "of" (P642), but for lexemes
Data type	Lexeme
Example	Lexeme:L1128 instance of (P31) Wikimedia duplicated page (Q17362920) → "of" Lexeme:L73 Lexeme:L1279 instance of (P31) Wikimedia duplicated page (Q17362920) → "of" Lexeme:L73
See also	of (P642): (This property is being deprecated, see details at WD:P642) qualifier stating that a statement applies within the scope of a particular item

(Add your motivation for this property here.)
--- Jura 18:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't think we allow two properties with the same label, do we? So if this is to be done it would need a different English label I think. "of lexeme" perhaps? In any case, the provided examples are surely better handled with a "said to be the same as (lexeme)" direct link, rather than this indirect approach. Also I would hope the duplicate issue gets resolved quickly and we won't even have this issue in the future, so I'd argue that doing anything to handle these particular cases now is premature. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Add "(lexeme)".
  --- Jura 07:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for two reason:
1. This property name is unreasonably vague, when the proposal has a clear purpose for it.
2. Duplicate Lexemes are much better marked using a "duplicate Lexeme" property.
@Jura1: In what situations would you expect us to need to have duplicate Lexemes (rather than two Lexemes that are spelled the same and closely related?) Deryck Chan (talk) 16:33, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Of allows people to put information into Wikidata without really specifying the relationship. I think it's much better to have more specific properties. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why not just let John know that he made some duplicate lexemes? It worked out well when I did it. Mahir256 (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, no support − Pintoch (talk) 09:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]