Wikidata:Requests for comment/Proposals for the 'Place' related properties
An editor has requested the community to provide input on "Proposals for the 'Place' related properties" via the Requests for comment (RFC) process. This is the discussion page regarding the issue.
If you have an opinion regarding this issue, feel free to comment below. Thank you! |
THIS RFC IS CLOSED. Please do NOT vote nor add comments.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- P540 was deleted, P206 is discussing in Wikidata:Properties_for_deletion#Property:P206_located_on_body_of_water, no other relevant results.--GZWDer (talk) 09:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There has been some discussion of the P540 (P540) and P766 (P766) properties here, here and here.
This RFC is to review all the different properties related to places and try to see what people feel about what properties we should and shouldn't have.
Please take the discussion to the Talk page. Keep this page for the proposals.
Contents
Specialist properties based on the subject and the object
editSpecialist properties based on the domain - the class of items that use this properties - and the range - the class of objects the property links to:
- P540 (P540) - domain class: event; range class: stadiums, theatres, conference centres
- P766 (P766) - domain class: event; range class: places excluding stadiums, theatres, conference centres.
Specialist properties based on the object
editSpecialist properties depending on the range - the class of item the property links to:
- located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) - range class: administrative territorial entity (Q56061)
- located in/on physical feature (P706) - range class: natural geographical features
- located in or next to body of water (P206) - range class: lake (Q23397)
- 'located in' (new property) - range class: Buildings, streets, villages, places smaller than administrative divisions which are not natural geographical features.
- located on street (P669) - range class: streets
also coordinate location (P625) - range value: Any datatype:coordinates
Specialist properties based on the subject
editSpecialist properties depending on the domain - the class of pages that use the property:
- headquarters location (P159) - domain class: organizations
- location of formation (P740) - domain class: organizations
- place of birth (P19) - domain class: persons
- place of death (P20) - domain class: persons
- place of burial (P119) - domain class: persons
- ancestral home (P66) - domain class: persons
- official residence (P263) - domain class: persons
- residence (P551) - domain class: persons
- location of discovery (P189) - domain class: objects, concepts
- place of publication (P291) - domain class:books and periodicals
General properties with qualifiers
edit- located in the administrative territorial entity (P131), located in/on physical feature (P706), P766 (P766), coordinate location (P625) - range class:places
- qualifiers: instance of (P31)
- values 'headquarters', 'branch offices', 'legal residence' used with domain class:organizations
- values 'ancestral home', 'residence' used with domain class:persons
- etc.
- qualifiers: instance of (P31)
- significant event (P793) -
- range class:classes of events e.g. burial (for persons), foundation (for organizations) etc.
- qualifiers (for places): located in the administrative territorial entity (P131), located in/on physical feature (P706), P766 (P766), coordinate location (P625)
They seem to have a consensus on the discussion page to delete located in or next to body of water (P206) and relace it by located in/on physical feature (P706). Any oposition? --Fralambert (talk) 23:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. First is "placed at" while second is "placed within". See Russian label. Infovarius (talk) 19:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]