Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2012/12/09
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Archives
Duplicate entry: German Wikipedia had no interwiki link. "International" item Q409998. --Kolja21 (talk) 00:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate with Q138112 (I really don't care which goes...) --Tazerdadog (talk) 05:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- It isn't a duplicate, those are 2 different things Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 05:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, typo in link... duplicate with Q138122. Will check both links this time...
- Ok, got it right this time, sorry!
Tazerdadog (talk) 05:09, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. Well... this duplicate was created by MerlIwBot and if I delete it, it isn't restorable. I'll wait, once I deleted a duplicate by this bot it was a mistake, so I'm not sure Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 05:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, as long as you are aware of it. Tazerdadog (talk) 05:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. Well... this duplicate was created by MerlIwBot and if I delete it, it isn't restorable. I'll wait, once I deleted a duplicate by this bot it was a mistake, so I'm not sure Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 05:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- "this duplicate was created by MerlIwBot and if I delete it, it isn't restorable"... wait WHAT? Are you sure about that? That seems like a rather significant failure on several parties' parts. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- I am almost certian that is wrong, Lukas. You can restore a deleted page that was created by MerlIwBot just like you can any other page. Tiptoety talk 05:33, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- No, I can't because the pages both link to the same Wikipedia pages. I already tried to in another situation like this. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 05:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- For the record, how I found the duplicate was by trying to add a description to one of the articles, and have the server reject it due to the wikilinks being on a different "article"(or whatever the correct word is here). Plowing through the details gave me the rest. Tazerdadog (talk) 05:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting, you are right. Take a look at File:Wikidata error message.PNG. Someone might want to file a bugzilla. Tiptoety talk 05:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- I am going to leave the bugzilla filing to the administrators, who know how the system is supposed to work normally. Cheers--Tazerdadog (talk) 06:10, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- What I saw, and later recreated.
- Interesting, you are right. Take a look at File:Wikidata error message.PNG. Someone might want to file a bugzilla. Tiptoety talk 05:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- For the record, how I found the duplicate was by trying to add a description to one of the articles, and have the server reject it due to the wikilinks being on a different "article"(or whatever the correct word is here). Plowing through the details gave me the rest. Tazerdadog (talk) 05:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- No, I can't because the pages both link to the same Wikipedia pages. I already tried to in another situation like this. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 05:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- I am almost certian that is wrong, Lukas. You can restore a deleted page that was created by MerlIwBot just like you can any other page. Tiptoety talk 05:33, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- I have manually removed the links from 154110. Deleting it shouldn't cause a problem now, and it will be restoreable if necessary. —WFC— 01:10, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- I deleted the page, as WFC said it could be restored if we need it. So
Done Restu20 01:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- I deleted the page, as WFC said it could be restored if we need it. So
merged with Q395173 --Sk!d (talk) 01:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Vogone (talk) 01:43, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
merged with Q410874 --Sk!d (talk) 02:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate, see: Q405692 (Cars: disambiguation page) --Kolja21 (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 06:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate, see: Q499144 (Duck and Cover (film)) --Ericmetro (talk) 06:07, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
{{Done}}- I'm not sure that was a duplicate. en:Duck and cover relates to the broader concept, and should probably have its own entry in Q625495. en:Duck and Cover (film) belongs in Q499144. —WFC— 06:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Restored and interwiki/description added for Duck and cover. —Theopolisme 07:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you - I created this entry for the article about the film on zh.wikipedia, but I agree that since the concept hasn't got its own entry, this could be reserved for it. --Ericmetro (talk) 09:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that was a duplicate. en:Duck and cover relates to the broader concept, and should probably have its own entry in Q625495. en:Duck and Cover (film) belongs in Q499144. —WFC— 06:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate, see: Q589411 (Euryattus) --Eumolpo (talk) 07:08, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done Have a good day :D --Sotiale (talk) 07:10, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate, see: Q568098 (Chalcotropis) --Eumolpo (talk) 07:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done Have a good time with happy contributing! --Sotiale (talk) 07:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate entry of Q630446 --Wgreenow (talk) 15:30, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 15:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Does an edit to this page sound an alarm in your house or something? You're really, really fast on these.
Sven Manguard Wha? 16:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not only lukas23 is fast on this page, but also Restu20 is really fast. Almost no other admin beside those two users get a chance to delete a item. --Wiki13 (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yep! They have get performance of Core i7 processors... Wagino 20100516 (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- @Sven & Wagino: Both not exactly :P Yeah, I'm kinda fast ;) Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 17:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yep! They have get performance of Core i7 processors... Wagino 20100516 (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not only lukas23 is fast on this page, but also Restu20 is really fast. Almost no other admin beside those two users get a chance to delete a item. --Wiki13 (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Does an edit to this page sound an alarm in your house or something? You're really, really fast on these.
empty, maybe duplicate of Q663230 --Beta16 (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done. --Stryn (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
duplicate of Q624543 --Chris857 (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
duplicate of Q677281 --Moroboshi (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
merged with Q395415 --Sk!d (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Accidental Duplicate entry --DeltaQuad (talk) 22:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done --Vogone (talk) 22:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)