Open main menu

Wikipedia page can not be linkedEdit

Site link eswiki:Roberto Cassá is already used by item Q16625632 and can not be linked to Q17086675. 190.166.6.37 02:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, I totally forgot this one. Those items are merged now, thank you for reporting. --Stryn (talk) 13:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

UnmergaaEdit

tämä: [1]. Joku on taas suorittamassa mustaa vyötä daijussa. --Pxos (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

  Tehty. --Stryn (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Visibility hidingEdit

When User:John F. Lewis changes the visibility of certain revisions, he uses "hide" as reason. Can you as a former oversighter tell whether this is according to policy here? Normally the reason tells the reason for hiding. --Pxos (talk) 09:46, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, When I am deleting a revision, I will use a valid rationale for it. I use the rationale 'hide' in cases where putting the reason for deletion will attract unwanted attention and defeat the purpose of revision deletion. As you pointed here; I mostly do it prior to oversighting. It is within in policy to use ambiguous rationales for revision deletion on the grounds that specifically stating it will cause unnecessary attention and assuming it is a step between oversighting a revision. I'd appreciate if you came to me with concerns rather than poking others about the validity of my actions :) John F. Lewis (talk) 16:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
We do not actually have policies on deletion and revision deletion, but doing this is widely accepted before requesting oversight. Otherwise, a more descriptive reason is used.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Merge-project requiring language skillsEdit

Dear Wikidatan,

Even though Wikidata phase 1 (replacing interlanguage by Wikidata) is officially finished, there are still a lot a duplicate items that should be merged. Projects to list possible duplicates (and therefore possibles mergers) have been started by users such as Pasleim with User:Pasleim/projectmerge and Ivan A. Krestinin with User:Ivan A. Krestinin/To merge. Those bot-generated lists do however contain quite some false positives and therefore still need a human eye to decide whether to merge or not.

Since you are an administrator on Wikidata with knowledge of the Finnish language, User:Ivan A. Krestinin/To merge/fiwiki might use your help. As said, it lists couples of WD items that might possibly be merged. If you are already involved in these projects or not interested, I am sincerely sorry for bothering you.

With kind regards, FakirNL (talk) 23:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. I try to help as much as possible. --Stryn (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Avoin Suomi 2014 FYIEdit

http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata-l/2014-August/004249.html in case you are interested. John Vandenberg (talk) 15:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Yep, I'm aware of that. Just the date is not suitable for me (because of work). If you're interested and you have time, I'm sure Wikimedia Suomi would be happy to get someone experienced user like you :) --Stryn (talk) 16:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

FideIDEdit

Hello, You participiated in the discussion of the property Elo rating (P1087), so you might be interested to know that there now is a proposal for a property of a related topic: FideID. It is discussed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person#FideID. Regards, Dipsacus fullonum (talk) 04:23, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Tack!Edit

Tack! Gabbe (talk) 06:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject TennisEdit

Thank you. I usually write for the WikiProject Tennis in it.wiki, in these days we talk about wikidata to use it for to update the singles and doubles ranking of a tennis player. We want to create a property in wikidata updated weekly by a bot.--Matlab1985 (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

I now it. In this moment in it.wiki I'm updating the singles and doubles rankings with my bot, but I hope to use wikidata to insert this information automatically. I read about the Pfd about some properties so I'm waiting (with the it.wiki tennis project) the evolution about this deletions.--Matlab1985 (talk) 20:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Plimsoll lineEdit

Hei! Toivon, että Wikidatan ylläpito ei ole siinä valheellisessa käsityksessä, että ihmiset jaksavat opetella käyttämään tätä. Minä en ainakaan jaksa minuuttia pitempään. Sivut Waterline (Q492878) ja Q942969 pitäisi yhdistää. Sain keskustelusivulleni ohjeet, mutta en lue niitä eikä merge onnistu, joten kumoan kottikärryn sinulle. --Pxos (talk) 11:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Meillä on vaan liian monta laiskaa ylläpitäjää :) Olishan se kiva, jos kaikki olisi niin selkeää, että jokainen ymmärtäisi. Mulle kyllä saa laittaa näitä yhdistämispyyntöjä ihan vapaasti. Teen sen noiden osalta, kun ehdin töistä kotiin. Stryn (talk) 11:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Kiva. Tämä on ihan sama ilmiö kuin Wikipedian mallineissa. Ihminen haluaa muuttaa oman kuntansa väkiluvun oikeaksi mutta törmää johonkin hirveään koodiin, joka johtaa sivulle, jossa lukee "tätä saavat muuttaa vain ammattilaiset". Ymmärrän hyvin Visual Editorin kehittelyn ja onkin vähän omituista, että en-wiki vastusti sitä niin voimakkaasti. Toki salakielellä torjutaan myös vandalismia, joten on siinä hyviäkin puolia. --Pxos (talk) 11:54, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Sain nuo sivut nyt auki, mutta niitä ei pystykään keskenään yhdistämään, koska noissa kahdessa sivussa on kaksi eri linkkiä samaan wikiin (lueteltu alla). Ja yksi sivu voi sisältää vain yhden linkin samaan wikiin.

A conflict detected on dawiki: Q942969 with dawiki:Plimsoll-mærke, Q492878 with dawiki:Vandlinje
A conflict detected on elwiki: Q942969 with elwiki:Γραμμή φόρτωσης, Q492878 with elwiki:Ίσαλος
A conflict detected on eswiki: Q942969 with eswiki:Marca de francobordo, Q492878 with eswiki:Línea de flotación
A conflict detected on frwiki: Q942969 with frwiki:Ligne internationale de charge, Q492878 with frwiki:Ligne de flottaison
A conflict detected on itwiki: Q942969 with itwiki:Occhio di Plimsoll, Q492878 with itwiki:Linea di galleggiamento
A conflict detected on ndswiki: Q942969 with ndswiki:Plimsollmark, Q492878 with ndswiki:Waterlinie
A conflict detected on nlwiki: Q942969 with nlwiki:Plimsollmerk, Q492878 with nlwiki:Waterlijn
A conflict detected on plwiki: Q942969 with plwiki:Znak wolnej burty, Q492878 with plwiki:Wodnica (okrętownictwo)
A conflict detected on ptwiki: Q942969 with ptwiki:Linha Plimsoll, Q492878 with ptwiki:Linha de água

Eli jos joku osaa selvittää nuo ristiriidat ensin, ilmoitin sivulla Wikidata:IC. Toki voit siirtää yksittäisiä linkkejä myöskin. Jos siis fi-wikin linkki pitäisi siirtää toiseen kohteeseen, niin niin voi toki tehdä. --Stryn (talk) 14:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
En minä oikein tiedä noista. Huomasin vain, että fi-wikin artikkelista ei pääse en-wikiin, mutta it-wikistä pääsi (koska linkki on siellä upotettu sivuun). Tuo on tyypillinen "laitan silmät kiinni, niin mörkö menee pois" -asia, ja laitakin nyt silmät kiinni. Toivottavasti vyyhti selviää. --Pxos (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Arbeit vs. ArbeidEdit

Hi. I merged the wikidata for the disambugition pages for the Nordic languages Q11246075 no:Arbeid with the wikidata for German de:Arbeit. You reverted this with reference to Wikidata:WikiProject_Disambiguation_pages/guidelines#Links. I see that strictly speaking, the words are one letter apart from being written exactly the same way. However, this is the same word, the word arbeid in Norwegian is derived from the German word Arbeit, so I like to request this being merged. I am not so familiar with wikidata, how to put forward requests of this type, so if this the wrong place, I do apologize. Kind regards M14 (talk) 22:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello! The idea of this is that the words must be written exactly the same way. Because it might be that some day there will be disambiguation pages on the Norwegian Wikipedia or somewhere else for the both of those words; Arbeid and Arbeit. --Stryn (talk) 06:08, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Addition of P641 to players' entriesEdit

Stryn, what is the point of adding sport (P641)tennis (Q847) to all the tennis players' items when they already have occupation (P106)tennis player (Q10833314)? Although I'm not 100% sure of Multichill's views, it appears from his answer to me a couple of days ago on his talk page (in this instance regarding football players) that this isn't necessary when P106 is already in use. I would be more inclined to use it on an item such as tennis ball (Q246514)... Jared Preston (talk) 19:37, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Inwind pointed out another interesting angle: How to deal with amateurs? Multichill (talk) 19:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Well, I added it because the property description says: "sport or discipline in which the entity participates or belongs to" and there were already many athletes using this property so I thought it's ok to add it. But I'll stop adding it now and will correct the entries where I added it after we really know how to use the property. I think that we should start a discussion at the property's talk page about that. I can't do it today (it's evening here), but if you could start the discussion, that would be great. Anyway, I pretty much agree with your view. --Stryn (talk) 19:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
I've made a comment at Inwind's talk page. That may be or even should be addressed first, because whether or not we add sport (P641), I certainly don't think it's correct to be removing occupation (P106) at the same time. Noting here, some tennis players may or may not "make a living" out of their sport, but if you are at tournaments week in, week out, it would be hard to have any other profession anyway. However, I came here to discuss the addition of P641 – I just don't see it as being applicable, so yes, I guess I should go to the appropriate discussion page, otherwise people like Inwind could suggest that even changing "rower" or "tennis player" to simply "athlete (Q2066131)" would be incorrect, because the person may not even earn enough money to pay their rent through prize money or weekly wages (tennis player vs. footballer e.g.). (Then, and only then, would I support usage of sport (P641)tennis (Q847), if occupation (P106)athlete (Q2066131) – but that looks strange anyway...) As a tennis player, I don't think Serena Williams would have such problems, and tennis player (Q10833314) should definitely not be deleted from her item. Adding sport (P641) just seems wrong because the property is treated like a term, and less so a qualifier, as such. The two don't belong together, and I'm glad you agree, Stryn. Oh, and while I'm here, when do you think that the "prize money" (seems appropriate to ask this now, haha!) and the properties for singles & doubles tournament wins will be created? I've felt pretty impatient about that over the last few months! Jared Preston (talk) 22:04, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
To the latter question (about prize money), see User_talk:Lydia_Pintscher_(WMDE)#Quantity_datatype_with_units. We already have the property for singles tournament wins, see Property:P1131, but only Rafael Nadal (Q10132) is using it! :O So... someone should start adding the property to other tennis players. And it seems that we don't have a property for doubles tournament wins yet, so someone need to propose it first at WD:PP. --Stryn (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hyvää huomenta! Thanks for the links, in fact, I've just seen that not only do we have P1131 (P1131), but P1130 (P1130) too! My next question would be: for the ladies, I don't think it would be appropriate to lump WTA and ITF tournament victories together. Shouldn't we have a qualifier? I don't know how this would work, because we only have the one property, but something like P1131 (P1131) → ## → WTA Tour (Q2537906)? But what about ITF Women's Circuit (Q2701085)? This probably wasn't given any thought during creation, which is why it's only present at Rafael Nadal (Q10132). There's nothing there which tells us in this case that it's referring to the ATP Tour (Q300008). Jared Preston (talk) 06:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 :) See my comment at Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_Tennis#Tournament_victories. --Stryn (talk) 17:54, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

wrong editEdit

Hi. This edit is wrong

Oops. Fixed, thanks for reporting! --Stryn (talk) 10:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

ReferaattiEdit

Tässä [2] on taas joku helvetin pölkkypää ollut asialla ja yhdistänyt referaatin lähdeviittaukseen. Ei päivää ilman jotakuta törppöä. --Pxos (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Finnish IPEdit

Hi there, would you mind having a quick word with, and have a look at the edits of Special:Contributions/85.76.85.204? Taking this as an example, the anonymous user is disambiguating the label and writing full sentences, using punctuation, in the descriptions. Thanks man! Jared Preston (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I'm always happy to help guiding Finnish users. I left him a message. --Stryn (talk) 20:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Nice one! He replied too. Had to use google translate to see what he wrote, but all seems positive :) have a nice evening! Jared Preston (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

BarnstarEdit

  The Barnstar of Dilligence
Thank you for your gnomish work on deletions of empty items! There will always be more, so get your guns ready. :P Jianhui67talkcontribs 16:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Danke wiele, Jianhui67. --Stryn (talk) 16:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Aditional option on Reforming administrator inactivity criteria RFCEdit

Just to let you know after a comment made by User:Ajraddatz on Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Reforming_administrator_inactivity_criteria I have added another option (50 mainspace / project edits & 5 admin/crat actions over 6 months). As you voted for 50 mainspace edits & 5 admin/crat actions over 6 months I thought you might like to know incase you are not watching the page and want to alter your comments / adjust which you prefer! ·addshore· talk to me! 00:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, I just left my opinion there. --Stryn (talk) 11:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Osaisitko auttaa?Edit

Minulla on täällä palauttajan oikeudet. Sivuhistoriat ovat vain hieman sekavia, kun rollback ja restore on kumpikin palauta. --Geohakkeri (talk) 11:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

No ne vaan on samaksi käännetty, ikuinen ongelma, josta Pxos on puhunut fi-wikissä useaan otteeseen. Eipä noille oikein järkevämpää käännöstä keksi... --Stryn (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Olet muuten tainnut tuon itse kääntää: translatewiki:MediaWiki:Wikibase-restoreold/fi. --Geohakkeri (talk) 12:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Niinpä olen näköjään, mutta muuten se olisi "restore", jos sitä ei olisi käännetty ollenkaan. "Palauta" nuo restoret tuppaa useimmiten olemaan. --Stryn (talk) 12:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Points for minor changesEdit

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that you get points even for changing labels. 1 point if it is something minor like a spelling error or decapitalising the first letter and 5 points if the previous one was wrong in some way. Thanks for all the good work you are doing! Jan Ainali (WMSE) (talk) 17:16, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. I will correct my points in my next update. --Stryn (talk) 17:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

ÖstsvenskaEdit

Do you think it could be of any value to convince the developers to add an eastern version of Swedish to be added to labels and properties with monolingual text? I am thinking of those cases when the vocabulary have some differences, like maskinpistol? I am not saying that it is another language, but rather an alternative way to choose which words you prefer is certain situations. "Anstalt" instead of "Myndighet" was one thing that made me confused for example when I read some papers from VERO. I first had difficulties to understand why a prison would send my clients their papers, until I recognized the other meaning of the word. And the word "prestationsbetalarna" made my brain go hot for a few minutes before I understood what they meant. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 08:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Not a bad idea, I think. My Swedish sucks nowadays, but I remember that there really are some different words between "Swedish" speaken in Sweden and "Östvenska". There are some words that are different; for example Swedish cykel is cykel also here, but it can be also fillare or ped. --Stryn (talk) 08:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

what's my mistakeEdit

hello ،،Stryn،، what is fault me،do you speak arabic ، i am waited refusal Badr alkabir (talk) 18:51, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I don't speak Arabic, but the problem was that you translated Portuguese pages into Arabic language. Maybe it was not intentional, but you continued doing so despite of warnings that you got on Meta, please see the page history. I can remove the block, if you don't do so in the future. Though the block is only 2 hours. --Stryn (talk) 18:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

error on wikiEdit

hi Stryn this error on wiki iam click on translate arabic but he give me Wikimedia LGBT/Activities/pt ،its not my wrong ،sorry wiki Badr alkabir (talk) 19:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok, just be more careful, if you see /pt there, just don't translate. I unblocked you. --Stryn (talk) 19:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thanks for me and wikimedia,i will be much industriousBadr alkabir (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Kiitos vauhdikkaasta avusta!Edit

Kiitos avusta latauksen korjaamisessa! – Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 15:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

) Stryn (talk) 15:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Voitko auttaa wikidata-asiassaEdit

Artikkeli Wolf Hoffmann hyväksyttiin hyväksi artikkeliksi. Sain muut asiat tehtyä mutta en saanut merkattua wikidatassa hyväksi. Johtuneeko siitä, etten pystynyt kirjautumaan (Accept-Finland) 95.175.104.87 04:44, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Lisätty. Vain kirjautuneet käyttäjät pystyvät muokkaamaan noita laatutasoja. Mistähän johtui, ettet pystynyt kirjautumaan sisään? Systeemin pitäisi kirjata sinut automaattisesti sisään, kun tulet toisesta projektista Wikidataan. Stryn (talk) 06:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
@Stryn Samaa olen ihmetellyt itsekin. Jostain syystä se ei vaan kirjaa sisään. Nyt olisi kuitenkin sama homma tuon Accept - artikkelin kanssa, eli se äänestettiin myös hyväksi. 95.175.104.70 17:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Lisätty. Stryn (talk) 09:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Terseruksen kansalaisuusEdit

Hei, bottisi oli tehnyt Johann Terseruksesta Suomen kansalaisen. Ei oikein toiminut. -Ochs (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Johtuu siitä, että luokitus suomenkielisessä Wikipediassa on pielessä (w:fi:Luokka:Suomalaiset professorit). Eihän ruotsalaisen henkilön pitäisi olla suomalainen professori, joka kuuluu luokkaan Suomalaiset henkilöt ammateittain -> Suomalaiset henkilöt. Näköjään fiwikin luokkasivulla on käyty keskustelua siellä tehdystä virheestä, mutta mitään ei ole toistaiseksi saatu korjattua. Stryn (talk) 06:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Itse asiassa olinkin väärässä tuossa tapauksessa, sillä botti oli tuonut tiedon Wikidataan jo ennen kuin artikkeli oli kyseisessä luokassa. Hyvä että löysit virheen. Stryn (talk) 06:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Language "no"Edit

Hello. Thank you for notice it to me. As I know Norwegian Wikipedia has the code no, I thought it was right. Later I remember that there are two Norwegian, but I did not know what to do. Thank. Millars (talk) 08:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Stryn".