Wikidata talk:WikiProject Wikipedia Sources

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Nomen ad hoc in topic Qualifiers to source-identifiers

Invitation edit

The Source MetaData WikiProject does not exist. Please correct the name. Please consider joining this project, a more narrowly scoped initiative, under the umbrella of WikiCite and WD:WikiProject Source, to create a high-quality corpus of structured data limited to sources cited in Wikipedia, across all languages. Our starting point to create this corpus is a dataset (created in March 2018) of Citations with identifiers in Wikipedia (Q51903355). See the todo list on the main project page.--DarTar (talk) 08:49, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Is this task list still "done"? edit

I'd like to help, but I'm unclear if there's really anything left to do. I presume there is work to do, but this certainly implies to do list is done. Trilotat (talk) 21:15, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Qualifiers to source-identifiers edit

Hi all! On Italian Wikipedia we are using many identifiers from Wikidata in the "External links" through it:Template:Collegamenti esterni. All the linked pages of the identifiers have a title (title (P1476)), some of them have an author (author name string (P2093)/author (P50)), sometimes (e.g. scanned dictionaries) there are also a date of publication (publication date (P577)) and a volume (volume (P478)). All this data can be imported as qualifiers of the identifiers and then our template can read them. An example: Alessandro Manzoni (Q1064). If there are no objections, we can start importing qualifiers for some most relevant properties; here just a first list:

Bye, --Epìdosis 12:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I don't generally qualify identifiers when I add them, but I certainly think adding qualifiers is a good idea, especially when automated processes can add the missing data. - PKM (talk) 21:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@PKM: Would you prefer title (P1476) or subject named as (P1810) as qualifier for the title? In your opinion, which is the difference between them? --Epìdosis 15:32, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Epìdosis: Title in most cases. “Title” is the published title of a work or encyclopedia entry. Use “named as” when the entry in the source uses a different name than the wikidata item (so “Mark Twain” in a biographical database “named as” Samuel Langhorne Clemens). - PKM (talk) 19:19, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
OK, thank you. --Epìdosis 21:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Strong support. An automated process would certainly be of great help. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 11:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC).Reply

See also: Wikidata:Project chat#IDs authors (@PKM: FYI). Nomen ad hoc (talk) 11:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC).Reply

Wikidata external IDs edit

Dear Project Members,

I proposed a new template which integrates Wikidata external IDs in Wikipedia to channel in reliable sources as further readings - please weigh in on the idea if you have the time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)?fbclid=IwAR1jjICvpWSSSqYwzT9IsSjMJxfZ7-vLoGjE2U4BB_zPVTg8EJSQ0qylqHQ#A_new_use_for_Wikidata_external_IDs_in_Wikipedia_(template)

Best, Adam Harangozó (talk) 17:00, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Return to the project page "WikiProject Wikipedia Sources".