Property talk:P1871
Documentation
identifier in the Consortium of European Research Libraries Thesaurus
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1871#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1871#Type Q5, Q115537581, Q167037, Q2221906, Q8436, Q207174, Q795052, Q16334298, Q14514600, Q20830276, Q783794, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1871#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1871#Scope, SPARQL
About 3000 additions edit
FYI [1] --Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 11:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- I see Magnus had already added over 10 thousands on January 7, thanks Magnus![2] Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 11:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Single value? no edit
The claim is made above that most CERL IDs will have a single value, but that doesn't seem to be the case from what I've seen. There appear to be at least six identifiers for Aeschylus (Q40939) alone, and possibly more. Do the maintainers of their database do no merging of duplicate items? --EncycloPetey (talk) 14:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- They certainly do, but like every other database there are errors. VIAF has many duplicates, too. I guess the "single value" property is aspirational, as in many other properties. Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- I ask because I know that VIAF has consolidated many duplicates. Where they had more than one, those have since been combined. The GND has also had some duplicates, but I have seen them correcting these issues as they are found. Is the CERL database doing the same thing, or should we expect the many duplicates to remain without correction? --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- I already answered this question above. If you ask numbers about how many items are consolidated over time, I don't have any (nor we have numbers about VIAF, AFAIK). Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 13:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- VIAF monitors Wikidata when we flag duplicates. --RAN (talk) 02:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- I already answered this question above. If you ask numbers about how many items are consolidated over time, I don't have any (nor we have numbers about VIAF, AFAIK). Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 13:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- I ask because I know that VIAF has consolidated many duplicates. Where they had more than one, those have since been combined. The GND has also had some duplicates, but I have seen them correcting these issues as they are found. Is the CERL database doing the same thing, or should we expect the many duplicates to remain without correction? --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Errors edit
I am correcting errors in Wikidata of people who died before they were born and people who lived over 120 years that are not recognized supercenturians. Many errors are coming from this database. Is there a mechanism to correct the errors? The best I can do on the Wikidata end is to deprecate the error and give "reason for deprecation" as implausibility. Someone at VIAF reviews errors we flag here and makes corrections, we need the same for CERL. --RAN (talk) 02:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- CERL has actually just started the process of reviewing errors and resolving conflicts with Wikidata. For now I think they focused on disambiguation and the main results of that can be seen at Special:Contributions/Lenlivent. Nemo 18:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Database will be migrated to a newer version edit
Note on the home page ("Aktualisierung"):
- Am 11. April wird diese Datenbank auf eine neuere Version migriert. Bitte beachten Sie, dass es ab dem 10. April, 12:00 Uhr (GMT) nicht mehr möglich sein wird, Datensätze zu bearbeiten.
- Die Datenbank wird am 11. April den ganzen Tag heruntergefahren. Sie steht voraussichtlich ab dem 12. April wieder zur Verfügung.