Property talk:P1871

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kolja21 in topic Database will be migrated to a newer version

Documentation

CERL Thesaurus ID
identifier in the Consortium of European Research Libraries Thesaurus
Applicable "stated in" valueCERL Thesaurus (Q60909659)
Has qualityprefix (Q23585486)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainhuman (Q5), imaginary character (Q115537581), corporation (Q167037), geographic location (Q2221906), family (Q8436), personification (Q207174), individual (Q795052), group of living things (Q16334298), group of fictional characters (Q14514600), group of mythical characters (Q20830276) or company (Q783794)
Allowed valuesc(af|nc|ni|nl|np)0\d{7}
ExampleSimone da Lesina (Q18945790)cnp00166993 (RDF)
Diego Velázquez (Q297)cnp00396778 (RDF)
Charles Baudelaire (Q501)cnp01430730 (RDF)
Sourcehttps://thesaurus.cerl.org
Formatter URLhttps://data.cerl.org/thesaurus/$1
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total328,309
Main statement288,75588% of uses
Qualifier3<0.1% of uses
Reference39,55112% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Format “c(af|nc|ni|nl|np)0\d{7}: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1871#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1871#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1871#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1871#Scope, SPARQL
 

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

About 3000 additions edit

FYI [1] --Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 11:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

I see Magnus had already added over 10 thousands on January 7, thanks Magnus![2] Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 11:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Single value? no edit

The claim is made above that most CERL IDs will have a single value, but that doesn't seem to be the case from what I've seen. There appear to be at least six identifiers for Aeschylus (Q40939) alone, and possibly more. Do the maintainers of their database do no merging of duplicate items? --EncycloPetey (talk) 14:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

They certainly do, but like every other database there are errors. VIAF has many duplicates, too. I guess the "single value" property is aspirational, as in many other properties. Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
I ask because I know that VIAF has consolidated many duplicates. Where they had more than one, those have since been combined. The GND has also had some duplicates, but I have seen them correcting these issues as they are found. Is the CERL database doing the same thing, or should we expect the many duplicates to remain without correction? --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
I already answered this question above. If you ask numbers about how many items are consolidated over time, I don't have any (nor we have numbers about VIAF, AFAIK). Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 13:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
VIAF monitors Wikidata when we flag duplicates. --RAN (talk) 02:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Errors edit

I am correcting errors in Wikidata of people who died before they were born and people who lived over 120 years that are not recognized supercenturians. Many errors are coming from this database. Is there a mechanism to correct the errors? The best I can do on the Wikidata end is to deprecate the error and give "reason for deprecation" as implausibility. Someone at VIAF reviews errors we flag here and makes corrections, we need the same for CERL. --RAN (talk) 02:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

CERL has actually just started the process of reviewing errors and resolving conflicts with Wikidata. For now I think they focused on disambiguation and the main results of that can be seen at Special:Contributions/Lenlivent. Nemo 18:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Database will be migrated to a newer version edit

Note on the home page ("Aktualisierung"):

  • Am 11. April wird diese Datenbank auf eine neuere Version migriert. Bitte beachten Sie, dass es ab dem 10. April, 12:00 Uhr (GMT) nicht mehr möglich sein wird, Datensätze zu bearbeiten.
  • Die Datenbank wird am 11. April den ganzen Tag heruntergefahren. Sie steht voraussichtlich ab dem 12. April wieder zur Verfügung.

--Kolja21 (talk) Kolja21 (talk) 22:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P1871" page.