Ju gatsu mikka
Merging items
editHallo Ju gatsu mikka,
For merging items, you may want to use the merge.js gadget from help page about merging. It has an option "Request deletion for extra items on RfD" to automatically place a request to delete the emptied page. This way of nominating makes it a lot easier for the admins to process the requests.
With regards, - 
- (Cycn/talk) 11:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Did I forgot to ask ? Ju gatsu mikka (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think you did. That's not why I mentioned this. The gadget just makes it easier to do this and easier for the admins to process the requests. - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 12:03, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Goupix et Feunard
editBonjour, pourquoi as-tu-réverté ma modif sur Q3111682. Ca ne me parait pas très logique de présenter l'élément comme une liste de quelque chose. property talk:P360 indique que cette propriété doit être utilisée pour les éléments qui sont des instance of (P31): liste, ce qui me parait logique. Mais "nature de l'élémént : liste" veut dire que l'article Wikipédia lié est une liste (= une énumération d'entités qui répondent à une condition données). Ici, ce n'est pas vraiment le cas, on a bien un concept général ("la ligne évolutive de Vulpix" comme elle est appelée en catalan). C'est un vrai élément que l'on peut utiliser comme n'importe quel autre, à la différence des éléments de liste. --Zolo (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Zolo, même s'il ne s'agit pas d'une liste à puce (par exemple), il s'agit tout de même d'une liste dans le sens où il s'agit d'entités distinctes traitées séparément et réunit dans un article autour d'un thème ; il s'agit, en somme, ni plus ni moins que d'articles du type "liste de personnages", comme pour beaucoup d'autres œuvres, avec pour tronc commun l'appartenance à un même groupe d'évolution. Ju gatsu mikka (talk) 14:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- C'est vrai, un des intérêts de marquer un élément comme "liste", c'est justement de dire que l'article est une liste à puce, qu'on devrait pouvoiur un jour remplacer par un appel à Wikidata. Ici, on a quand même une description des bestioles, dans un article de liste, on a juste le nom, parfois un petite description et l'explication de leur présence dans la liste, mais pour l'essentiel, ils sont décrits dans un article séparé. "nature de l'élément : groupe évolutif de Pokémon" + "composé de Goupix et Feunard" me parait poser moins de problèle et sufft déjà à expliquer les choses (si on veut expliquer ce qu'est une ligne évolutive de pokémon, Q15795637 est le meilleur endroit pour le faire). -Zolo (talk) 12:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Relecture de Wikidata:Visites/Déclarations
editBonjour et merci pour ta relecture de Wikidata:Visites/Déclarations,
Par contre, il y a plusieurs de tes modifications que je ne comprends pas bien. Je crois même qu'elles sont inutiles. Par exemple, sur Translations:Wikidata:Tours/Statements/3/fr, selon le diff, tu as remplacé une espace par une espace… Vu la position de ladite espace, j’imagine que tu as essayé de remplacer l’espace par une espace insécable, est-ce le cas ?. Si oui, c’est inutile puisque 1. en édition, Mediawiki remplace automatique les espaces insécables par des espaces normales lors de l’enregistrement 2. à la lecture, Mediawiki place automatique des espaces insécables là où il y a besoin.
Merci tout de même pour ta relecture (notamment le modèle lang que j’ai honte d’avoir oublié /o\).
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 18:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Thx to fix P1112 of Xerneas, Yveltal, Zygarde and Diancie
editI'm not sure when I added this property then the numbers had "±1". --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- It seems number had to be "±1" by default with that property. I myself add "±0" each time to fix that. Ju gatsu mikka (talk) 05:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
RE: Pokémon species
editHi, I removed Pokémon species (Q3966183) in instance of (P31) to Charmander (Q3178753), Charmeleon (Q1637365) and Charizard (Q844940) (by now) but I replaced it with fire-type Pokémon (Q25930490) and flying-type Pokémon (Q25930493) (for Charizard (Q844940)) which are subclasses of (subclass of (P279)) Pokémon species (Q3966183). It should not create problems as in the talk page of P1112 (P1112) I can read: «Type "Pokémon species (Q3966183)": element must contain property instance of (P31) with class Pokémon species (Q3966183) or its subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279))». I'm going to explain everything in the wikiproject. --★ → Airon 90 07:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, I will create a list ASAP.
- Ok, but there should not be problems as shown above.
- Best regards, --★ → Airon 90 11:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P1112 has been updated and nothing is gone bad. I'm going to ask for a bot to do the substitution. ;) --★ → Airon 90 16:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I need you here to save this item (and future ones) from deletion. --★ → Airon 90 07:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
editHello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
edit(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject Pokémon
editHi, I saw that you contributed to the Pokémon WikiProject. If you are interested to help again this project, please add the talk page in your Watchlist and add your username to the list of participants so that you can be easily pinged. Sorry for bothering you with this message and thank you very much to read this request! --★ → Airon 90 09:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)