Stronhol44

Welcome to Wikidata, Stronhol44!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Pseudo-references

Don't use References section in items about chemical compounds to add pointless links to some blog/commercial website. Statements instance of (P31) = chemical compound or drug in these items are obvious and do not need any reference (just like statements about chemical formula which were automatically imported with a proper reference), especially those that clearly indicate not the desire to source the data, but to advertise the website. I will consider such editions as spam and revert it on sight. Wostr (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Recreation of deleted item

I have deleted Q114976829 because it appears to be a recreation of deleted item Q108934393 . This means that we have already made a decision that this entity does not satisfy our notability criteria. Please do not recreate deleted items, as they are likely to be deleted again immediately, and your account may be blocked. To appeal this decision, see Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion. Bovlb (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely for recreation of many deleted items. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest it by editing this page and adding the following template with a suitable reason: {{unblock|1=<the reason for your unblock request>}}. If you are logged in, and the option has not been disabled, you may also email the blocking administrator (or any administrator from this list) by using this form. See Wikidata:Guide to appealing blocks for more information.

---

⁠

Hola, he sido bloqueado por ti y has eliminado algunas mis ediciones y contribuciones.

Sin duda, es un error por tu parte.

He cumplido con los requisitos en cada una de mis aportaciones, incluyendo información contrastada con perfiles contrastados y datos correctos.

No puedes bloquear una cuenta con miles de aportaciones sin contrastar mis aportaciones.

Ruego que se tenga en cuenta mi perfil y se restablezca mi cuenta. Saludos

English

Hi, I have been blocked by you and you have deleted some of my edits and contributions. No doubt this is a mistake on your part.

I have complied with the requirements in each of my contributions, including verified information with verified profiles and correct data.

You cannot block an account with thousands of contributions without checking my contributions.

Please take my profile into account and reinstate my account.

Regards

They are researchers, they have all their profiles ResearchGate, publons, orcid, Loop, published books, etc.. They have mentions in digital newspapers in their country (Spain), ISNI, ISSN.... And you and other Wikidata profiles, who are not from Spain, decide that they have no authority, when they do and they have been deleted not by the authority, but by the user Docosong (that you mention).

I was blocked by Docosong in CA Wikipedia because of an error of that user, who thought that we were two different users. We sent him mail and contacted him with our personal RR. SS. but to no avail.

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Stronhol44 block log • ipblocklist • crossblock • luxo's • unblock • remove gblock • contribs: +/-

---

Request reason:

I think the above must be regarded as unblock request. Lymantria (talk) 12:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You do not appear to understand that you may never create an item on an entity which has already gotten its item deleted, despite repeated instructions as to how to appeal deletions of items. This applies regardless of whether those entities would otherwise meet WD:N.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

---

беларуская (тарашкевіца) | български | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | français | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | svenska | 中文 | +/−

Comment by the blocking admin: User has been blocked for recreation of several earlier deleted items, despite warning above by Bovlb. Besides, at WD:AN concerns have been raised about the abuse of multiple accounts, for wich this user has been blocked at cawiki. I don't see reason to unblock. --Lymantria (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Some notes:

• This user has been editing on Wikidata since 2021-06-06 and has amassed 6,474 edits.
• The majority of these edits have been deleted, dating back to 2021-06-28.
• Not strictly relevant to a block here, but this user is currently indefinitely blocked on CAWP (abuse of multiple accounts) and ESWP (account with a particular purpose).
• Some examples of deleted items include Q123367473, Q123584539, Q123502958, Q123577513, Q123573778, Q123510214. Most of these were recreations of previously-deleted items created by the same user, most since my warning above. Q123577513 was a recreation of Q113644472, created by Verónica Llana Celada.
• The items claim to be for researchers and have multiple identifiers and some references. Unless there's something deceptive about the entries, there would certainly be a case to be made for undeletion of some of these items.
• I see no evidence that this user has ever sought undeletion, merely repeatedly recreating deleted items.

In conclusion: This user is causing disruption by their behaviour of recreating deleted items in place of seeking undeletion. While they might be operating in good faith, that would indicate some lack of competence or other communication problem. The unblock request does not address this point and provides no assurance that the disruption would not continue if unblocked. I am therefore unable to accept this unblock request, but I'm not going to decline, given my previous involvement here. Bovlb (talk) 16:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the input Bovlb.

As you indicate, my contributions have been correct in Wikidata and have been removed for no real reason, as they met the requirements requested by Wikidata.

Based on this, if my contributions are restored, I will not be able to make the mistake of recreating something that has been deleted and Wikidata editors will have common and real criteria for all users.

All of my contributions that have been deleted in the last two years meet Wikidata's criteria. They have all been researchers or companies that meet the necessary identifiers.

Thank you Stronhol44 (talk) 18:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that if we unblock you, restore all of your deleted contributions, and never delete your future contributions, then you will never again recreated a previously-deleted item. That's not really adequate as an unblock request as it provides no reasonable assurance that the block is not necessary to prevent future disruption to the project. Indeed, it reads more like a threat to cause more disruption the next time you don't get your way.

Could you please explain why you recreate deleted items instead of requesting undeletion? Was there something unclear about my warning above? Bovlb (talk) 18:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Bovlb. It's not a threat, apologies. What I mean is that if they hadn't unfairly deleted my previous posts that met Wikidata's requirements, I wouldn't have made the mistake of recreating a previously deleted entry.

I have recreated them because I have never been given a coherent explanation and when I have asked on a wiki to explain the reasons, I have never been listened to and my requests have been ignored.

As they have been deleted a first time (missing correct identifiers), they delete them without explanation. Since 16 July 2021, I have not included any data of persons or companies that do not meet all the criteria.

It was a mistake on my part, due to the desperation of internal criteria.

This is the first time any Wiki editor has ever wanted to solve a problem and come to understand the real problem.

Thank you Stronhol44 (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry to hear that you have not received a good explanation. Administrators should always be ready to explain their actions. Can you please link to where you have requested an explanation for deletion? So far as I can see, your only contributions to Wikidata outside of mainspace have been this unblock request.

Did you have an opportunity to read the document I linked to in my warning above? It provides guidance on how to appeal deletion, including another very clear warning not to recreate the deleted item. Bovlb (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

On Wikipedia you can see how they don't answer me. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:Stronhol44#c--sasha--20221023184900-Bloqueo Stronhol44 (talk) 19:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

OK. We can't deal with issues on other projects here, and that doesn't explain your behaviour on Wikidata.

It doesn't appear that you have ever requested clarification of a deletion here on Wikidata, nor have you ever appealed a deletion. You have been told how to appeal deletion and warned not to recreate items, yet you have continued to recreate deleted items regardless. You have yet to address this issue. I don't believe your unblock request is going to be successful unless you can remedy that. Bovlb (talk) 19:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

I can't find that information in my Wikidata messages, but that's the way it is.

I have not committed any infringements in creating content and they have been deleted regardless of the veracity of the information.

I have made the mistake of re-creating them, it is true, but because they met Wikidata's standards.

I can't change the past, but I don't deserve a block on Wikidata.

Thank you for your patience. Stronhol44 (talk) 20:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Can you see the topic entitled "Recreation of deleted item" on this page? Bovlb (talk) 20:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I can see it. It is above, on this same page. Stronhol44 (talk) 20:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

I think I've done everything I can here. Bovlb (talk) 21:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)