Wikidata:互助客棧/存檔/2018
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
請幫忙合併項目
Q1550170與Q11105295所指均爲枇杷屬（Eriobotrya），需要合併。--辻畠 (talk) 08:07, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
請合併 Q9231421 與 Q15046788
Q9231421與Q15046788為Category:爪甲團囊菌目的不同語言頁面。--Tomchiukc (talk) 07:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- 已由@1233:
Done。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
請協助Q4083866與Q47529748合併
請協助Q4083866與Q47529748合併及建立。 我是新手，完全搞不懂如果要成立英文項目的中文版該怎麼做，我好像搞砸了。 我是專業翻譯家，但是是電腦白痴。 我想建立https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Bentall 的中文版頁面，但我不知道正確的建立頁面方式。 剛剛上網爬文試看看自己弄，結果顯示有重複po文，沒成功。 – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dean2018 (talk • contribs) at 16:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC).
- Done下次別忘記簽名哦。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear 各位前輩大家好，我是Dean2018，我是新手。
我想要建立https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Bentall 的中文版頁面，
我已經將內容從英文維基翻成中文了。
我也建立了一個項目，https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4083866，但跟沙盒的介面不一樣，我找不到內容要貼在哪裡呢？
而且也不知道怎麼和英文維基做連結？
我昨天已經爬文一整天了，但還是有看沒看懂，我需要協助教我建立這個中文頁面。 by Dean2018 (talk) 08:32, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Dean2018:請將您建立的條目貼入至此按發佈頁面即可。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
There has been a request for comment about developing a policy about privacy and items about living people. Your participation is encouraged above. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC) (from Rschen7754)
請求刪除或合併Q48937231數據
理由為：已經合併數據至Q1155919--Z7504 (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
請關注本提案，並歡迎討論此屬性之相關技術與實務問題。Taiwania Justo (talk) 03:29, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Additional proposals have been made on the RFC, and your comments are welcome. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC) (for [[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754)
重定向請求
請重定向Q52556924至Q63971。我曾嘗試合併，但遇到未知錯誤。Jonashtand (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Hsarrazin: Agree this merge request or not? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- thanks for ping Liuxinyu970226
- also
WikiProject Books has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. - the answer is ABSOLUTELY NOT !
- one is the work item, the other is a specific edition. I've been cataloguing thousands of texts, recently, with the same system : work + edition, with P629/P747 to link them. This is the norm for cataloguing texts, whether they are books, or only short texts inside books, like poems, short stories, etc.
- in any case, links to frws would refuse the merge, because the work item has a link to a "multiple editions" page set on frws.
- see Wikidata:WikiProject_Books for more info about FRBR and the choices made by this project, which are conform to the most recent catalographic world norms. --Hsarrazin (talk) 15:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
How do you think about it, this was rejected years ago but now has a lot of users who just make support votes. --117.136.54.99 23:03, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
請求刪除Q55611824數據
理由為：已經有同樣內容的數據 Q48903559，謝謝！--Shenchen13 (talk) 01:47, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Shenchen13:
Merged 下次請說成請求合併，這種有效項原則上不予刪除。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:48, 18 July 2018 (UTC) - 了解，對不起......再次感謝。--Shenchen13 (talk) 01:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
請求合併Q55861611和Q55718346
兩個數據是同一個人物。Siujyuzi (talk) 02:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Done --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
請求合併 Q661441 和 Q20744249
從百科頁面的描述證實兩者是相同的：
--Reke (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- 啊啊已經有人 Done了。--Reke (talk) 12:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
請求合併Q56284458與Q24897274
不好意思，不小心搞錯，沒發現已存在同一個頁面。--HellWK (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
請求更正中文名 Q15905035
正確應為→黃士杰，可佐證 zh:黃士杰 (音樂人) --Artejune (talk) 21:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Artejune:恐怕無能為力，涉及簡繁轉換問題。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: 謝謝回覆 --Artejune (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
A RFC has been proposed on changes to various administrator and user conduct policies including edit warring, page protection, involved administrators, and interface administrators. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC) (for Rschen7754)
請求合併Q132628到Q25414198
根據APG IV，鞭寄生亞科(Hydnoroideae)現在被放在胡椒目馬兜鈴科裡面。參考資料：[1]Yrr933! (talk) 17:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hydnoraceae is the name of a family
- Hydnoroideae is the name of a subfamily
By definition two different concepts. - Brya (talk) 16:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Brya is correct. First of all It seems very odd to merge a subfamily of "family A" into another "family B", without also including the parent "family A" in the merge. Unless of course APG IV claims that Hydnoraceae ("family A") is now considered defunct and has invalidated that taxon, and in the process of doing so has lifted out its daughter taxon (i.e. subfamily) Hydnoroideae into Aristolochiaceae ("family B"), which doesn't seem to be the case.
- Secondly (and regardless of APG IV) we shouldn't merge the Wikidata item of a family, with the Wikidata item of one of its own subfamilies. Both taxon names represents sovereign taxa in their own rights (valid or not), hence each of them deserves individual, specific Wikidata items. This is analogous to the fact that we also keep separate Wikidata items for valid species names and their synonyms, rather than merge the synonyms with their valid counterparts. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 18:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC).
- As has been pointed out before, although such items are described (in English anyway) as instances of "taxon", they are more accurately instances of "taxon name". We should not merge taxon names, regardless of any opinion as to the synonymy of the associated taxa. Each has its own history, associated data (author, date, bibliographic reference, etc.) and entry in taxonomic databases. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Indeed Peter, and of course I know this. Nonetheless: thanks for pointing it out. There is of course a big difference between "taxon" and "taxon name", and unfortunately the terms are often mixed together (also by me) even though they're not really interchangeable. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 19:59, 29 September 2018 (UTC).
- As has been pointed out before, although such items are described (in English anyway) as instances of "taxon", they are more accurately instances of "taxon name". We should not merge taxon names, regardless of any opinion as to the synonymy of the associated taxa. Each has its own history, associated data (author, date, bibliographic reference, etc.) and entry in taxonomic databases. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)